Does a Simplified 6-Joint Ultrasound Index Correlate Well Enough With the 28-Joint Disease Activity Score to Be Used in Clinical Practice?

OBJECTIVE: Ultrasound (US) has become an important tool in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but it is time consuming in clinical practice. We compared 3 US indices (with different numbers of joints) with disease activity measured by the 28-Joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) in order to find the most parsimonious index still useful in clinical practice. METHODS: Sixty consecutive RA patients were included. The DAS28 score was calculated by the attending rheumatologist, and later in the day, they underwent US examination by another rheumatologist trained in US (bilateral gray-scale and power Doppler examination of the wrist and metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints). Three different US indices were constructed: index A (22 joints), index B (10 joints), and index C (6 joints). RESULTS: All 3 US indices were significantly higher in patients with active disease versus inactive disease (P < 0.05 for all 3). Ultrasound index C showed the best correlation with DAS28 (rho = 0.5020, P < 0.0001) and a very good discriminative value for moderate to high disease activity (DAS28 >3.2) and for absence of remission (DAS28 >2.6) (areas under receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.75 and 0.80, respectively). A cutoff value of 3 in US index C showed sensitivity of 88.89% and specificity of 66.67% for absence of remission. Correlation between the 3 US indices was excellent. CONCLUSIONS: A US index of 6 joints (both wrists and second and third metacarpophalangeal joints bilaterally) correlated well with disease activity measured by DAS28 and may be used to evaluate RA patients in daily practice.

Responsiveness to therapy change of a global ultrasound assessment in spondyloarthritis patients.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the responsiveness to therapy change of a global ultrasound (US) assessment in the short-term monitoring of spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients with peripheral involvement. Consecutive SpA patients with both clinical peripheral involvement and active disease (initiating or changing therapy) were included. All patients underwent both clinical and US assessment in day entering the study and after 3 months of follow-up. Peripheral global US assessment included the recognition of abnormal inflammatory findings at joint, tendon, and entheseal level according to standardized scanning methods. A total of 34 patients completed both basal and 3-month follow-up assessments. Acute phase reactants, both erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein, tenderness (68) and swollen (66) joint counts, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index and Health Assessment Questionnaire decreased significantly at 3-month follow-up. Total score for the global US assessment also decreased significantly between basal and 3-month follow-up assessment [mean difference, 12.33 (IC 95 %, 9.23-15.42); p < 0.0001]. All individual component, joint, tendon, and enthesis scores, also showed a significant decrease during the follow-up period. A high degree of intra-observer reliability was found for the global US assessment (ICC [95 % CI]: 0.977 [0.961-0.993]). This global US assessment, including joints, tendons, and entheses, showed a good responsiveness to clinical changes and might be useful for monitoring SpA patients with peripheral involvement.

Validation in Spanish of a screening questionnaire for the detection of psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE: A patient self-administered questionnaire [PsA Screening and Evaluation (PASE)] has been developed and validated in English, but has not been tried in Spanish speaking populations. This study aimed to adapt and validate PASE in Spanish to screen Spanish speaking psoriasis patients for signs and symptoms of inflammatory arthritis. METHODS: Initial translation from English to Spanish (forward translation) was performed by two independent translators and the resulting versions were synthesized during a consensus meeting. The questionnaire was tried in a pilot study and resulted in a change in the agreement scale for a frequency scale with wording adaptation [Spanish PASE (PASE-S)]. RESULTS: One hundred and eleven patients were screened with PASE-S; 25 with PsA (without previous treatments), 23 with psoriasis, 22 with psoriasis and OA and 41 with OA without psoriasis. The diagnosis of psoriasis was performed by a dermatologist, and a rheumatologist determined the diagnosis of PsA or OA. Patients with PsA had statistically significant higher symptoms, function and total PASE-S scores compared with those without PsA. Receiver operator curves showed an area under the curve of 0.79 (95% CI 0.69, 0.89) for the total score. A cut-off value ≥34 showed sensitivity of 76%, and specificity of 74.4% for the diagnosis of PsA. CONCLUSION: The validated PASE questionnaire is a self-administered tool that can be used to screen for PsA among patients with psoriasis in a Spanish speaking population. PASE was able to distinguish between symptoms of PsA and OA.

Ultrasound assessment of new onset bilateral painful shoulder in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica and rheumatoid arthritis.

The aim of our study was to investigate by ultrasound (US) the anatomical structures affected during a new episode of bilateral painful shoulder in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to compare the findings between these two conditions. PMR and RA patients complaining of new onset bilateral painful shoulder were included. Subjects without any known rheumatic condition with a new onset unilateral painful shoulder were assessed as a control group. US evaluation includes the depiction subacromial-subdeltoid (SAD) bursitis, long head biceps (LHB) tenosynovitis and/or gleno-humeral (GH) synovitis. Thirty patients with PMR, 30 with RA, and 60 controls were included for a total of 60 shoulders per group. Unilateral SAD bursitis and LHB tenosynovitis were significantly more frequent in patients with PMR when compared to those with RA (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.01, respectively) and controls (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). Unilateral GH synovitis was more common in RA than in PMR and controls (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). Bilateral SAD bursitis was significantly more frequent in patients with PMR than in those with RA (p < 0.01) as was bilateral LHB tenosynovitis (p < 0.01). No significant differences were found in bilateral GH synovitis. US-detected periarticular inflammatory involvement more frequently in PMR both unilaterally and bilaterally and intra-articular inflammatory involvement was commonly in RA but only unilaterally.