A Novel Proliposomal Ropivacaine Oil: Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Studies After Subcutaneous Administration in Pigs.

BACKGROUND: Liposomal local anesthetics are limited by a short liposomal shelf-life, even when under refrigeration. We describe a novel proliposomal ropivacaine that produces liposomes in situ, only after exposure to aqueous media. METHODS: In vitro: Nanoparticles were assessed (particle size distribution analyzer, cryo-transmission electron microscopy) at baseline and after exposure to saline/plasma. TOXICITY: In porcine wound healing study (n = 12), healing was assessed by photography, clinical assessment, and histology. Pharmacodynamics: Seventeen young piglets were randomly assigned to plain 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 5), proliposomal 4% ropivacaine (n = 6), or sham (n = 6). Tactile threshold was assessed using von Frey filaments applied to the surgical wound; the nonoperated skin was used as a control. Tactile threshold over time was determined using area under the curve (AUC) and assessed by 1-way analysis of variance. PHARMACOKINETICS: 8 young piglets were randomly assigned to plain 0.5% (25 mg, n = 4) or proliposomal 4% (200 mg, n = 4) ropivacaine. Plasma ropivacaine was assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography at baseline and at intervals over 36 hours. Paired ropivacaine concentration (from wound exudate and plasma) was obtained at 96 hours. Data were analyzed using noncompartmental and compartmental models. RESULTS: In vitro: On exposure to saline and plasma, the study drug was transformed from a homogenous oil to an emulsion containing liposomes of approximately 1.4-µm diameter; this effect was dilution dependent and stable over time. TOXICITY: All wounds healed well; no effect of drug group was observed. Pharmacodynamics: Plain and proliposomal ropivacaine provided sensory anesthesia for approximately 6 and 30 hours, respectively. There was an approximately 7-fold increase in the AUC of anesthesia for proliposomal ropivacaine compared with plain ropivacaine (mean difference, 1010; 95% confidence interval [CI], 625-1396 g·h/mm; P < 0.0001). PHARMACOKINETICS: There was no difference in Cmax (2.31 ± 0.74 vs 2.32 ± 0.46 mg/L), despite an approximately 8-fold difference in dose. However, proliposomal ropivacaine was associated with a marked prolongation of Tmax (6.50 ± 6.35 vs 0.5 ± 0.0 hours), terminal half-life (16.07 ± 5.38 vs 3.46 ± 0.88 hours; P = 0.0036), and ropivacaine-time AUC (47.72 ± 7.16 vs 6.36 ± 2.07 h·mg/L; P < 0.0001), when compared with plain ropivacaine. The proliposomal formulation provided an approximately 250-fold higher ropivacaine concentration in the surgical wound (mean difference, 3783 ng/mL; 95% CI, 1708-5858; P = 0.001) and an approximately 25-fold higher wound:plasma ropivacaine concentration ratio (mean difference, 126; 95% CI 38-213; P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Proliposomal ropivacaine exerted prolonged anesthesia with delayed elimination, typical for liposomal drugs. The advantage of this novel proliposomal ropivacaine is its ease of preparation and its extended shelf-stability (>2 years) at room temperature.

Proliposomal Ropivacaine Oil: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Data After Subcutaneous Administration in Volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Slow-release liposomal formulations of local anesthetics prolong plasma redistribution and reduce peak plasma drug concentration, allowing safer administration of larger doses and further prolonging sensory effects. However, their clinical applicability is limited by expensive manufacture and liposomal leakage. Previously, we described the simple preparation of a novel proliposomal ropivacaine oil that produces multilamellar liposomal vesicles on exposure to aqueous media and that has a shelf-life of >2 years at room temperature. In this study, we present both pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data in healthy volunteers after subcutaneous injection of this novel proliposomal preparation of ropivacaine. METHODS: In the pharmacodynamic phase of this study, 15 volunteers received 3 separate subcutaneous injections of 2.5 mL containing 1 of the following drugs: proliposomal 4% ropivacaine, plain 0.5% ropivacaine, and the ropivacaine-free proliposomal vehicle. Drugs were administered into the lower back, and their location was randomized and blinded; a separate area was used as an uninjected, open control. Experimental sensory assessment was made at repeated intervals over 72 hours using both pinprick sensation and experimental heat pain tolerance (assessed using quantitative sensory testing). In a separate pharmacokinetic phase of this study, 9 volunteers received subcutaneous injections of 2.5 mL of either proliposomal 4% ropivacaine (n = 6) or plain 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 3); these participants had plasma ropivacaine concentrations assessed at repeated intervals over 72 hours. RESULTS: The mean ± SE duration of pinprick anesthesia after proliposomal and plain ropivacaine administration lasted 28.8 ± 6.0 and 15.9 ± 3.5 hours, respectively (mean difference, 16.8 hours; 95% confidence interval, 10.0-23.7; P = 0.001). For experimental heat pain, the anesthesia duration was approximately 36 and 12 hours, respectively, with mean ± SE area under the curve of the normalized heat pain tolerance over time 55.0 ± 28.8 Δ°C·min for proliposomal ropivacaine and 9.6 ± 26.0 Δ°C·min for plain ropivacaine (mean difference, 64.6 Δ°C·min; 95% confidence interval, 10.2-119.0; P = 0.036). In the pharmacokinetic study, there was no significant difference in peak plasma concentration in the proliposomal ropivacaine group (164 ± 43 ng/mL compared with 100 ± 41 ng/mL in the plain ropivacaine group; P = 0.07) despite an 8-fold increase in ropivacaine dose in the proliposomal group. The 99% upper prediction limit for peak plasma concentrations (351 ng/mL proliposomal; 279 ng/mL plain) was well below the putative toxic plasma concentration for both groups. The mean ± SE terminal half-life and area under the curve for proliposomal ropivacaine versus plain ropivacaine were 13.8 ± 3.6 hours vs 5.9 ± 2.3 hours (P = 0.011) and 5090 ± 1476 h·ng/mL vs 593 ± 168 h·ng/mL (P = 0.0014), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The prolonged pharmacodynamic effect of proliposomal ropivacaine, together with its delayed elimination and prolonged redistribution to plasma, is compatible to depot-related slow-release and similar to the performance of other liposomal local anesthetics. The advantage of the proliposomal oil is its ease of preparation and its extended shelf-stability at room temperature.

Prolonged Analgesic Effect of PRF-108 and PRF-110 on Post-operative Pain in Pigs.

INTRODUCTION: Local anesthetic infusion techniques have been reported to reduce opiate requirements and pain scores following different kinds of surgery, including orthopedic surgery, inguinal hernia, and Cesarean surgery in women. METHODS: PRF-108 and PRF-110 formulations were applied to the wound space in an incisional model in pigs to test the hypothesis that these formulations have better and longer analgesic effects than the commercially available ropivacaine solution (Naropin(®), AstraZeneca). RESULTS: The data show significantly better analgesic activity with PRF-108 and PRF-110 compared to ropivacaine. The duration of the analgesic efficacy of PRF-108 and PRF-110 was at least five times longer than that was measured following treatment with ropivacaine. The data further suggest that active clearance from the injection site (the wound) is much slower for PRF-108 and PRF-110 than for the commercial ropivacaine solution. CONCLUSION: Assessing the local concentration of PRF compounds and commercially available ropivacaine solution suggests that active clearance from the injection site (the wound) is much slower for PRF-108 and PRF-110 than for ropivacaine. FUNDING: PainReform.