Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Psychiatry ; 196(3): 179-85, 2010 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20194537

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Legislation and practice of involuntary hospital admission vary substantially among European countries, but differences in outcomes have not been studied. AIMS: To explore patients' views following involuntary hospitalisation in different European countries. METHOD: In a prospective study in 11 countries, 2326 consecutive involuntary patients admitted to psychiatric hospital departments were interviewed within 1 week of admission; 1809 were followed up 1 month and 1613 3 months later. Patients' views as to whether the admission was right were the outcome criterion. RESULTS: In the different countries, between 39 and 71% felt the admission was right after 1 month, and between 46 and 86% after 3 months. Females, those living alone and those with a diagnosis of schizophrenia had more negative views. Adjusting for confounding factors, differences between countries were significant. CONCLUSIONS: International differences in legislation and practice may be relevant to outcomes and inform improvements in policies, particularly in countries with poorer outcomes.


Assuntos
Internação Compulsória de Doente Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Psiquiátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Internação Compulsória de Doente Mental/legislação & jurisprudência , Comparação Transcultural , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...