Intrathecal Nicardipine for Severe Intractable Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome: A Novel Case Report.

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is a poorly understood but increasingly recognized entity, likely multifactorial in nature and characterized by diffuse cerebral vasospasm that presents as sudden, intense, and fluctuating headaches. Due to insufficient evidence, there is currently no consensus on RCVS treatment guidelines. However, nicardipine, an L-type calcium channel blocker, may prove effective in RCVS treatment because of its ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. We report the concomitant use of intrathecal (IT) nicardipine and continuous intraarterial (IA) nicardipine infusion via microcatheter placed in the intracranial circulation for the treatment of a 58-year-old female with severe refractory RCVS. On presentation, this patient was noted to have a non-traumatic non-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage secondary to RCVS. Initially managed with oral verapamil, she later developed refractory symptomatic vasoconstriction requiring multiple angiograms for spasmolysis via balloon angioplasty and IA nicardipine. Due to the refractory nature of her spasm despite the IA therapy, we decided to attempt intrathecal nicardipine, starting at 4 mg q12 h via an external ventricular drain. This dose was escalated to 4 mg q6 h. The patient stabilized for 24 h but again decompensated, requiring continuous IA spasmolysis via a microcatheter placed in the left middle cerebral artery and left for continuous IA nicardipine infusion (5 mg/h). The patient showed slow incremental improvement clinically and a decrease in vasospasms on imaging, ultimately suffering minimal stroke burden. This patient's hospital course demonstrates that nicardipine, administered intrathecally or intraarterially, could be beneficial in select patients with refractory RCVS as a means of minimizing repeat angiography/angioplasty. Further studies are needed to better define a treatment paradigm for these patients.

Comparison of nimodipine formulations and administration techniques via enteral feeding tubes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Nimodipine improves outcomes following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and current guidelines suggest that patients with aSAH receive nimodipine for 21 days. Patients with no difficulty swallowing will swallow the whole capsules or tablets; otherwise, nimodipine liquid must be drawn from capsules, tablets need to be crushed, or the commercially available liquid product be used to facilitate administration through an enteral feeding tube (FT). It is not clear whether these techniques are equivalent. The goal of the study was to determine if different nimodipine formulations and administration techniques were associated with the safety and effectiveness of nimodipine in aSAH. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter observational cohort study conducted in 21 hospitals across North America. Patients admitted with aSAH and received nimodipine by FT for ≥3 days were included. Patient demographics, disease severity, nimodipine administration, and study outcomes were collected. Safety end points included the prevalence of diarrhea and nimodipine dose reduction or discontinuation secondary to blood pressure reduction. Predictors of the study outcomes were analyzed using regression modeling. RESULTS: A total of 727 patients were included. Administration of nimodipine liquid product was independently associated with higher prevalence of diarrhea compared to other administration techniques/formulations (Odds ratio [OR] 2.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41-3.67, p-value = 0.001, OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.37-5.55, p-value = 0.005, for old and new commercially available formulations, respectively). Bedside withdrawal of liquid from nimodipine capsules prior to administration was significantly associated with higher prevalence of nimodipine dose reduction or discontinuation secondary to hypotension (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.57-5.06, p-value = 0.001). Tablet crushing and bedside withdrawal of liquid from capsules prior to administration were associated with increased odds of delayed cerebral ischemia (OR 6.66, 95% CI 3.48-12.74, p-value <0.0001 and OR 3.92, 95% CI 2.05-7.52, p-value <0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that enteral nimodipine formulations and administration techniques might not be equivalent. This could be attributed to excipient differences, inconsistency and inaccuracy in medication administration, and altered nimodipine bioavailability. Further studies are needed.

Quinolone-Induced Painful Peripheral Neuropathy: A Case Report and Literature Review.

We present a case report of a 20-year-old male with diabetes mellitus type 1, who developed severe painful peripheral neuropathy while on the second of a 10-day course with levofloxacin for the treatment of epididymitis. The intensity of the pain rapidly reached scores of 10/10 in a numeric scale 0/10, and the patient was transferred to an inpatient pain unit where he was treated aggressively with minimal improvement. A skin biopsy revealed small fiber neuropathy. Then the patient was treated with intravenous immunoglobulin, which improved the pain. Now the patient is on outpatient intravenous immunoglobulin infusions bimonthly and making a slow recovery.