Designing a dairy supply chain network considering sustainability and resilience: a multistage decision-making framework.

The crucial role of sustainable development and resiliency strategies is undeniable in today's competitive market space, especially after the Coronavirus outbreak. Hence, this research develops a multistage decision-making framework to investigate the supply chain network design problem considering the sustainability and resiliency dimensions. In this way, the scores of the potential suppliers based on the sustainability and resilience dimensions were calculated using the MADM methods, and then, these scores were applied as inputs in the proposed mathematical model (the second stage), which determined which supplier should be selected. The proposed model aims to minimize the total costs, maximize the suppliers' sustainability and resiliency, and maximize the distribution centers' resiliency. Then, the proposed model is solved by the preemptive fuzzy goal programming method. Overall, the main objectives and aims of the current work are to present a comprehensive decision-making model that can incorporate the sustainability and resilience dimensions into the supplier selection and supply chain configuration processes. In general, the main contributions and advantages of this work can be summarized as follows: (i) this research simultaneously investigates the sustainability and resiliency concepts in the dairy supply chain, (ii) the current work develops an efficient multistage decision-making model that can evaluate the suppliers based on the resilience and sustainability dimensions and configure the supply chain network, simultaneously. Based on the obtained results, the responsiveness and facilities reinforcement indicators are the most important indicators for the resilient aspect. On the other hand, reliability and quality are the most important indicators of sustainability aspect. Also, the results show that a large percentage of supply chain costs are related to purchasing and production costs. Besides, according to the outputs, the total cost of supply chain increases by enhancing the demand. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10098-023-02538-8.

A hybrid decision-making framework to manage occupational stress in project-based organizations.

According to recent studies in the field of human resource management (HRM), especially in project-based organizations (PBOs), stress is recognized as a factor that has a paramount significance on the performance of staff. Previous studies in organizational stress management have mainly focused on identifying job stressors and their effects on organizations. Contrary to the previous studies, this paper aims to propose a comprehensive decision-support system that includes identifying stressors, assessing organizational stress levels, and providing solutions to improve the performance of the organization. A questionnaire is designed and distributed among 170 senior managers of a major project-based organization in the field of the energy industry in Iran to determine organizational stressors. Based on the questionnaire results and considering the best worst method (BWM) as an approach to determine the weighting vector, the importance degree of each stressor is calculated. In the next stage, a decision-support model is developed to assess the stress level of a PBO through fuzzy inference systems (FIS). Some main advantages of the proposed hybrid decision-support model include (i) achieving high-reliable results by not-so-time-consuming computational volume and (ii) maintaining flexibility in adding new criteria to assess the occupational stress levels in PBOs. Based on the obtained results, six organizational stressors, including job incongruity, poor organizational structure, poor project environment, work overload, poor job promotion, and type A behavior, are identified. It is also found that the level of organizational stress is not ideal. Finally, some main recommendations are proposed to manage occupational stresses at the optimum level in the considered sector.

Designing a sustainable closed-loop pharmaceutical supply chain in a competitive market considering demand uncertainty, manufacturer's brand and waste management.

Pharmaceutical supply chain (PSC) is one of the most important healthcare supply chains and the recent pandemic (COVID-19) has completely proved it. Also, the environmental and social impacts of PSCs are undeniable due to the daily entrance of a large amount of pharmaceutical waste into the environment. However, studies on closed-loop PSCs (CLPSC) are rarely considered real-world requirements such as competition among diverse brands of manufacturers, the dependency of customers' demand on products' price and quality, and diverse reverse flows of end-of-life medicines. In this study, a scenario-based Multi-Objective Mixed-Integer Linear Programming model is developed to design a sustainable CLPSC, which investigates the reverse flows of expired medicines as three classes (must be disposed of, can be remanufactured and can be recycled). To study the competitive market and deal with demand uncertainty, a novel scenario-based game theory model is proposed. The demand function for each brand depends on the price and quality provided. Then, a hybrid solution approach is provided by combining the LP-metrics method with a heuristic algorithm. Furthermore, a real case study is investigated to evaluate the application of the model. Finally, sensitivity analysis and managerial insights are provided. The numerical results show that the proposed classification of reverse flows leads to proper waste management, making money, and reducing both disposal costs and raw material usage. Moreover, competition increases PSCs performance and improves the supply of products to pharmacies. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10479-021-03961-0.

An integrated approach for a sustainable supplier selection based on Industry 4.0 concept.

The recent advances in sustainable supply chain management are integrated with Industry 4.0 concepts. This study develops a new integrated model to consider the sustainability and Industry 4.0 criteria for the supplier selection management. The proposed approach consists of the fuzzy best worst method (FBWM) and the two-stage fuzzy inference system (FIS) to assess the selection of suppliers. Firstly, this study determines a comprehensive list of Industry 4.0 and sustainability criteria along with their definitions. Then, the importance weight of each criterion is computed by the FBWM. Subsequently, a two-stage FIS is devoted to nominate the suppliers' performance with regard to the sustainability and Industry 4.0 criteria. To show the applicability of our integrated model, a case study for a textile company in Iran is provided. Finally, some sensitivity analyses are done to assess the efficiency of the proposed integrated approach. One finding is to establish a decision-making framework to evaluate suppliers separately, rather than relatively in a fuzzy environment using Industry 4.0 and sustainability criteria.

A hyper-hybrid fuzzy decision-making framework for the sustainable-resilient supplier selection problem: a case study of Malaysian Palm oil industry.

One of the major challenges of the supply chain managers is to select the best suppliers among all possible ones for their business. Although the research on the supplier selection with regards to green, sustainability or resiliency criteria has been contributed by many papers, simultaneous consideration of these criteria in a fuzzy environment is rarely studied. Hence, this study proposes a fuzzy decision framework to investigate the sustainable-resilient supplier selection problem for a real case study of palm oil industry in Malaysia. Firstly, the resilient-based sustainable criteria are localized for the suppliers' performance evaluation in palm oil industry of Malaysia. Accordingly, 30 criteria in three different aspects (i.e. general, sustainable and resilient) are determined by statistical tests. Moreover, a hyper-hybrid model with the use of FDEMATEL (fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory), FBWM (fuzzy best worst method), FANP (fuzzy analytical network process) and FIS (fuzzy inference system), simultaneously is developed to employ their merits in an efficient way. In this framework, regarding the outset, the relationships among the criteria/sub-criteria are obtained by FDEMATEL method. Then, initial weights of the criteria/sub-criteria are measured by FBWM method. Next, the final weights of criteria/sub-criteria considering the interrelationships are calculated by FANP. Finally, the performance of the suppliers is evaluated by FIS method. To show the applicability of this hybrid decision-making framework, an industrial case of palm oil in Malaysia is presented. The findings indicate the high performance of the proposed framework in this concept and identify the most important criteria including the cost in general aspects, resource consumption as the most crucial sustainable criterion and agility as the most important resilient criterion.