Can severity of trunnion damage be estimated by visual inspection alone?

Taper corrosion has been widely reported to be problematic for modular total hip arthroplasty implants. A simple and systematic method to evaluate taper damage with sufficient resolution is needed. We introduce a semiquantitative grading system for modular femoral tapers to characterize taper corrosion damage. After examining a unique collection of retrieved cobalt-chromium (CoCr) taper sleeves (n = 465) using the widely-used Goldberg system, we developed an expanded six-point visual grading system intended to characterize the severity, visible material loss, and absence of direct component contact due to corrosion. Female taper sleeve damage was evaluated by three blinded observers using the Goldberg scoring system and the expanded system. A subset (n = 85) was then re-evaluated following destructive cleaning, using both scoring systems. Material loss for this subset was quantified using metrology and correlated with both scoring systems. There was substantial agreement in grading among all three observers with uncleaned (n = 465) and with the subset of cleaned (n = 85) implants. The expanded scoring criteria provided a wider distribution of scores which ultimately correlated well with corrosion material loss. Cleaning changed the average scores marginally using the Goldberg criteria (p = 0.290); however, using the VGS, approximately 40% of the scores for all observers changed, increasing the average score from 4.24 to 4.35 (p = 0.002). There was a strong correlation between measured material loss and new grading scores. The expanded scoring criteria provided a wider distribution of scores which ultimately correlated well with corrosion material loss. This system provides potential advantages for assessing taper damage without requiring specialized imaging devices.

Does generalized joint hypermobility influence the Ponseti treatment of clubfoot patients?

Previous investigators have suggested a role for generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) in the etiology of clubfoot deformity, while others have suggested its presence may influence treatment outcomes. We sought to determine if GJH was associated with the demographics, treatment, or propensity to relapse of patients whose clubfeet were managed using the Ponseti method. Fifty-seven patients with Ponseti-treated clubfeet comprised the cohort; median age 61 months (range, 38-111 months). A physical therapist evaluated each patient using the nine-point Beighton scale to quantify hypermobility. The scores were then correlated with patient sex, laterality, Dimeglio severity score, treatment, relapse, and surgery. The median Beighton score was 5; 49 of 57 patients (86%) had Beighton scores ≥4. All feet were plantigrade without symptomatic overcorrection at the time of evaluation. Although there was a slightly lower probability of relapse in patients with higher Beighton scores, this was not statistically significant (P = 0.10). Accordingly, the sex, laterality, initial severity, number of pretenotomy casts, need for tenotomy, relapse, and need for tendon transfer surgery were not significantly influenced by the Beighton score. The outcome of Ponseti clubfoot treatment is not altered by the presence of GJH in young children. Joint hypermobility does not appear to influence the likelihood of relapse or surgery. Unlike clubfeet reportedly treated with release surgery, Ponseti-treated clubfeet were not prone to excessive overcorrection regardless of joint laxity. Last, the distribution of Beighton scores in the study's cohort supports an association between GJH and clubfoot deformity.