Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Circ Res ; 127(9): e232-e249, 2020 10 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32811295

RESUMO

RATIONALE: After myocardial infarction, neutrophils rapidly and massively infiltrate the heart, where they promote both tissue healing and damage. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the dynamics of circulating and cardiac neutrophil diversity after infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: We employed single-cell transcriptomics combined with cell surface epitope detection by sequencing to investigate temporal neutrophil diversity in the blood and heart after murine myocardial infarction. At day 1, 3, and 5 after infarction, cardiac Ly6G+ (lymphocyte antigen 6G) neutrophils could be delineated into 6 distinct clusters with specific time-dependent patterning and proportions. At day 1, neutrophils were characterized by a gene expression profile proximal to bone marrow neutrophils (Cd177, Lcn2, Fpr1), and putative activity of transcriptional regulators involved in hypoxic response (Hif1a) and emergency granulopoiesis (Cebpb). At 3 and 5 days, 2 major subsets of Siglecfhi (enriched for eg, Icam1 and Tnf) and Siglecflow (Slpi, Ifitm1) neutrophils were found. Cellular indexing of transcriptomes and epitopes by sequencing (CITE-seq) analysis in blood and heart revealed that while circulating neutrophils undergo a process of aging characterized by loss of surface CD62L and upregulation of Cxcr4, heart infiltrating neutrophils acquired a unique SiglecFhi signature. SiglecFhi neutrophils were absent from the bone marrow and spleen, indicating local acquisition of the SiglecFhi signature. Reducing the influx of blood neutrophils by anti-Ly6G treatment increased proportions of cardiac SiglecFhi neutrophils, suggesting accumulation of locally aged neutrophils. Computational analysis of ligand/receptor interactions revealed putative pathways mediating neutrophil to macrophage communication in the myocardium. Finally, SiglecFhi neutrophils were also found in atherosclerotic vessels, revealing that they arise across distinct contexts of cardiovascular inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, our data provide a time-resolved census of neutrophil diversity and gene expression dynamics in the mouse blood and ischemic heart at the single-cell level, and reveal a process of local tissue specification of neutrophils in the ischemic heart characterized by the acquisition of a SiglecFhi signature.


Assuntos
Infarto do Miocárdio , Infiltração de Neutrófilos , Neutrófilos/citologia , Neutrófilos/fisiologia , Animais , Antígenos Ly/imunologia , Doenças da Aorta/patologia , Aterosclerose/patologia , Autoanticorpos/farmacologia , Células da Medula Óssea , Proteína beta Intensificadora de Ligação a CCAAT/metabolismo , Comunicação Celular , Senescência Celular , Mapeamento de Epitopos/métodos , Adesões Focais , Proteínas Ligadas por GPI/metabolismo , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Subunidade alfa do Fator 1 Induzível por Hipóxia/metabolismo , Isoantígenos/metabolismo , Antígenos Comuns de Leucócito , Lipocalina-2/metabolismo , Macrófagos/fisiologia , Camundongos , Infarto do Miocárdio/sangue , Neutrófilos/metabolismo , Especificidade de Órgãos , Receptores de Superfície Celular/metabolismo , Receptores de Formil Peptídeo/metabolismo , Lectinas Semelhantes a Imunoglobulina de Ligação ao Ácido Siálico/metabolismo , Baço/citologia , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Curr Treat Options Neurol ; 18(3): 11, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26920416

RESUMO

OPINION STATEMENT: Convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is a medical emergency with an associated high mortality and morbidity. It is defined as a convulsive seizure lasting more than 5 min or consecutive seizures without recovery of consciousness. Successful management of CSE depends on rapid administration of adequate doses of anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs). The exact choice of AED is less important than rapid treatment and early consideration of reversible etiologies. Current guidelines recommend the use of benzodiazepines (BNZ) as first-line treatment in CSE. Midazolam is effective and safe in the pre-hospital or home setting when administered intramuscularly (best evidence), buccally, or nasally (the latter two possibly faster acting than intramuscular (IM) but with lower levels of evidence). Regular use of home rescue medications such as nasal/buccal midazolam by patients and caregivers for prolonged seizures and seizure clusters may prevent SE, prevent emergency room visits, improve quality of life, and lower health care costs. Traditionally, phenytoin is the preferred second-line agent in treating CSE, but it is limited by hypotension, potential arrhythmias, allergies, drug interactions, and problems from extravasation. Intravenous valproate is an effective and safe alternative to phenytoin. Valproate is loaded intravenously rapidly and more safely than phenytoin, has broad-spectrum efficacy, and fewer acute side effects. Levetiracetam and lacosamide are well tolerated intravenous (IV) AEDs with fewer interactions, allergies, and contraindications, making them potentially attractive as second- or third-line agents in treating CSE. However, data are limited on their efficacy in CSE. Ketamine is probably effective in treating refractory CSE (RCSE), and may warrant earlier use; this requires further study. CSE should be treated aggressively and quickly, with confirmation of treatment success with epileptiform electroencephalographic (EEG), as a transition to non-convulsive status epilepticus is common. If the patient is not fully awake, EEG should be continued for at least 24 h. How aggressively to treat refractory non-convulsive SE (NCSE) or intermittent non-convulsive seizures is less clear and requires additional study. Refractory SE (RSE) usually requires anesthetic doses of anti-seizure medications. If an auto-immune or paraneoplastic etiology is suspected or no etiology can be identified (as with cryptogenic new onset refractory status epilepticus, known as NORSE), early treatment with immuno-modulatory agents is now recommended by many experts.

3.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat ; 10: 1469-77, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25143737

RESUMO

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) leads to many undesired problems and complications, including immediate and long-term seizures/epilepsy, changes in mood, behavioral, and personality problems, cognitive and motor deficits, movement disorders, and sleep problems. Clinicians involved in the treatment of patients with acute TBI need to be aware of a number of issues, including the incidence and prevalence of early seizures and post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE), comorbidities associated with seizures and anticonvulsant therapies, and factors that can contribute to their emergence. While strong scientific evidence for early seizure prevention in TBI is available for phenytoin (PHT), other antiepileptic medications, eg, levetiracetam (LEV), are also being utilized in clinical settings. The use of PHT has its drawbacks, including cognitive side effects and effects on function recovery. Rates of recovery after TBI are expected to plateau after a certain period of time. Nevertheless, some patients continue to improve while others deteriorate without any clear contributing factors. Thus, one must ask, 'Are there any actions that can be taken to decrease the chance of post-traumatic seizures and epilepsy while minimizing potential short- and long-term effects of anticonvulsants?' While the answer is 'probably,' more evidence is needed to replace PHT with LEV on a permanent basis. Some have proposed studies to address this issue, while others look toward different options, including other anticonvulsants (eg, perampanel or other AMPA antagonists), or less established treatments (eg, ketamine). In this review, we focus on a comparison of the use of PHT versus LEV in the acute TBI setting and summarize the clinical aspects of seizure prevention in humans with appropriate, but general, references to the animal literature.

4.
Curr Treat Options Neurol ; 16(7): 298, 2014 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24861129

RESUMO

OPINION STATEMENT: Treatment of epilepsy in patients with medical comorbidities can be challenging. Comorbidities can affect medical management and quality of life. In this review, we discuss treatment options in patients with epilepsy and medical comorbidities. In our opinion, the best way to manage patients with medical comorbidities and epilepsy is to accurately recognize and diagnose medical comorbidities, and to have adequate knowledge and familiarity with antiepileptic drug (AED) metabolism, dosing, side effects, and drug interactions. We believe the trend should move toward using the newer generation of AEDs given their generally reduced rate of adverse effects and interactions. The primary goal of therapy is seizure freedom without side effects.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...