RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to investigate the effectiveness of mHealth-supported active exercise interventions to reduce pain intensity and disability level in persons with hip or knee OA. DATA SOURCES: Three databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of science) were systematically searched for randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) published between 01-01-2012 and 31-07-2023. PROSPERO registration number of this review was CRD42023394119. STUDY SELECTION: We included only RCTs that were identified and screened by two independent reviewers (JM and GN). In addition, the reference lists of the identified studies were manually checked for further inclusion. Included studies had to provide a mHealth-supported active exercises for persons with hip or knee OA, and evaluate pain intensity and disability using both questionnaires and performance tests. DATA EXTRACTION: From the included studies, the two independent authors extracted data using a predetermined Excel form. Characteristics of the interventions were described and a meta-analysis was performed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twelve RCTs were included, representing 1,541 patients with a mean age of 58.7±5 years, and a BMI of 28.8±3.1; females being more predominant than males with a total ratio female/male of 2.2. The methodological quality of the included studies was of moderate quality in 75% of the studies. There was no statistically significant difference between mHealth-supported active exercises compared to the interventions without mHealth in terms of pain reduction (SMD= -0.42 [95%CI -0.91; 0.07], pâ¯=â¯0.08) and disability mitigation (SMDâ¯=â¯-0.36 [95%CI -0.81; 0.09], pâ¯=â¯0.10). However, a statistically significant difference was found between patient education combined with mHealth-supported active exercises compared to patient education alone in terms of pain (SMD= -0.42 [95%CI -0.61; -0.22], p<0.01) and disability (SMD= -0.27 [95%CI -0.46; -0.08], p < 0.01) reduction. CONCLUSION: mHealth-supported exercises were found to be effective, especially when combined with patient education, in reducing pain and mitigating disability in patients with hip or knee OA.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pelvic girdle pain represents a group of musculoskeletal pain disorders associated with the sacroiliac joint and/or the surrounding musculoskeletal and ligamentous structures. Its physical management is still a serious challenge as it has been considered the primary cause of low back pain. OBJECTIVE: This review sought to determine the effectiveness of motor control exercises for two clinically relevant measures; i.e., pain and disability, on patients with pelvic girdle pain of sacroiliac joint origin. METHODS: This review covered only randomized controlled studies. Online databases, such as PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, were searched from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2019. PEDro scale was used to assess the methodological quality of included studies, while Review Manager was employed to synthesize data in view of meta-analysis. The PRISMA guidelines were applied for this review. RESULTS: Twelve randomized controlled trials of moderate-to-high quality were included in this review. The studies involved 1407 patients with a mean age ranging from 25.5 to 42.1 years as well as intervention and follow-up durations from 1 week to 2 years. Motor control exercises alone for pelvic girdle pain of sacroiliac joint origin were not effective in terms of pain reduction (SMD = 0.29 [-0.64,1.22]) compared to control interventions whereas they were slightly effective in terms of disability reduction (SMD =-0.07 [-0.67, 0.53]) at short-term. The combination of motor control exercises with other musculoskeletal therapies, however, revealed to be more effective than control interventions in terms of pain reduction (SMD =-1.78 [-2.49, -1.07]; 95%CI) and lessened disability (SMD =-1.80 [-3.03, -0.56]; 95%CI) at short-term. CONCLUSION: Motor control exercises alone were not found to be effective in reducing pain at short-term. However, their combination with other musculoskeletal therapies revealed a significant and clinically-relevant decrease in pain and disability at short-term, especially in peripartum period.
