[Evaluation of the clinical classification of new cases of leprosy. Study conducted at the Marchoux Institute in Bamako, Mali]. / Evaluation de la classification clinique des nouveaux cas de lèpre. Etude réalisée á l'Institut Marchoux (Bamako, Mali).

INTRODUCTION: The difficulties related to the bacilloscopic diagnosis of leprosy, providing a more reliable classification of cases, in 1995 led the WHO to recommend the use of a new classification, in endemic countries, based on clinical criteria alone, in order to simplify the poly-chemotherapeutic regimens. According to our experience in the Marchoux Institute, this classification may lead to errors in diagnosis through overzealous or mis-interpretation of the two forms of leprosy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the concordance between this clinical classification and that based on a bacilloscopic examination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study of new cases of leprosy seen at the Marchoux Institute, without distinction in gender or age, from January to December 2000. All the patients included underwent clinical examination and a bacilloscopic exploration to provide a double classification. The concordance between the two classifications was assessed using the Kappa test. RESULTS: Two hundred new cases of leprosy were included. Out of 126 clinically multi-bacillary cases, 61 were confirmed bacteriologically, and 65 were false positives. Out of 74 clinical cases with few bacilli, 2 were bacteriologically multi-bacilli. The concordance between the two classifications was average (Kappa=0.40). There was a significant difference between the percentages of multi-bacilli observed in both classifications (p<10(-8)). DISCUSSION: The clinical classification may well overestimate the multi-bacillary form. In the absence of a reliable bacilloscopic apparatus, a more detailed clinical classification of leprosy forms must be developed.

Evaluation de la classification clinique des nouveaux cas de lèpre. Etude réalisée à lInstitut Marchoux (Bamako, Mali) / Evaluation of the clinical classification of new cases of leprosy. Study conducted at the Marchoux Institute in Bamako, Mali

INTRODUCTION: The difficulties related to the bacilloscopic diagnosis of leprosy, providing a more reliable classification of cases, in 1995 led the WHO to recommend the use of a new classification, in endemic countries, based on clinical criteria alone, in order to simplify the poly-chemotherapeutic regimens. According to our experience in the Marchoux Institute, this classification may lead to errors in diagnosis through overzealous or mis-interpretation of the two forms of leprosy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the concordance between this clinical classification and that based on a bacilloscopic examination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study of new cases of leprosy seen at the Marchoux Institute, without distinction in gender or age, from January to December 2000. All the patients included underwent clinical examination and a bacilloscopic exploration to provide a double classification. The concordance between the two classifications was assessed using the Kappa test.RESULTS: Two hundred new cases of leprosy were included. Out of 126 clinically multi-bacillary cases, 61 were confirmed bacteriologically, and 65 were false positives. Out of 74 clinical cases with few bacilli, 2 were bacteriologically multi-bacilli. The concordance between the two classifications was average (Kappa=0.40). There was a significant difference between the percentages of multi-bacilli observed in both classifications (p<10(-8)). DISCUSSION: The clinical classification may well overestimate the multi-bacillary form. In the absence of a reliable bacilloscopic apparatus, a more detailed clinical classification of leprosy forms must be developed.

Valeur prédictive des motifs de consultation pour le diagnostic de lèpre à Bamako (Mali) / Predictive value of medical reasons in the diagnosis of leprosy in Bamako (Mali)

INTRODUCTION: One of the weak points in the strategy for eliminating leprosy is the poor quality of screening. To overcome this, the World Health Organization (WHO) encourages endemic countries to run campaigns for the elimination of leprosy by circulating educational messages and mobilizing the medical community for early screening of cases. The aim of our study was to identify the motives for consultation with high predictive value for the diagnosis of leprosy and to determine the late diagnosis factors and hence assist the staff on site to improve the results of their leprosy elimination campaigns. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study consisted, during the second trimester of 1999, in interviewing all the patients consulting for the first time the Marchoux Institute or the units screening for leprosy in the Bamako area. The interview recorded the motives for consultation, the delay before consulting and the reasons for late consulting. To assess their positive predictive value, the motives for consultation were related to the diagnosis retained (leprosy or not). RESULTS: One thousand one hundred and seventy seven patients were interviewed. The motive for consulting, "suspected leprosy", scored the highest positive predictive value (PPV) (80 p. 100): 12 cases of leprosy were diagnosed by 15 consultants having suspected leprosy. Neurological problems were the second motive for consultation (PPV=61.9 p. 100). The most frequent motive for consultation was spots or "macules" (20 p. 100 of consultations), but only provided a positive predictive value of 19 p. 100. Prior consultations and non-specialized treatments were identified as factors of delay in diagnosing leprosy (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of leprosy cannot be based on the motives for dermatological consultation alone. The macules are the most apparent signs, but of low predictive value. Nevertheless, they are an early but non-specific sign of leprosy and are often neglected by the patient. Other than macules, attention must be paid to the neurological signs (dysesthesia, motor disorders) when screening for leprosy. These signs may appear early on, or be observed at a late stage in the progression of the disease.