Qualitative analysis of the implementation of a hospital room service in a large metropolitan hospital: foundations for transformation.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Room service is a hospital meal service model with demonstrated improved nutrition intake, reduced wastage and cost benefits in some settings compared with traditional models. However, uptake across public hospital settings appears low; the underlying reasons require exploration. In 2019, room service was introduced in a Queensland Hospital and Health Service site. The aim of this article is to identify the barriers and enablers to implementing room service to provide recommendations for future implementation of this model. METHODS: The current qualitative descriptive study utilized semistructured interviews with project members and key stakeholders involved in implementation of the room service meal delivery model at the Prince Charles Hospital (Queensland, Australia). A convenience sample of participants were recruited. Interviews explored project experiences from commencement to completion, barriers and enablers to implementation, strategies to overcome challenges and recommendations for implementation at other sites. Interviews were coded to identify themes and subthemes. RESULTS: Nine participants were interviewed. Key themes with associated subthemes were (1) foundations of transformation, (2) navigating implementation and (3) embedding sustainable practices. CONCLUSION: The current study adds rich information to understand factors that support the implementation of a room service model in a large public hospital. Future implementation of room service should not only consider measuring quantifiable outcomes, but also the importance of qualitative descriptive studies surveying project members and key stakeholders to further explore experiences, barriers and enablers to implementation and develop strategies to overcome challenges to assist further sites implement this model.

Impact of room service on nutritional intake, plate and production waste, meal quality and patient satisfaction and meal costs: A single site pre-post evaluation.

AIM: Room service is a patient-focused foodservice model gaining interest in Australian hospitals following demonstrated patient and organisational benefits. This study aimed to compare nutritional intake, waste, patient satisfaction, meal costs and meal quality between a bought-in, thaw-retherm foodservice model and a cook-fresh, on-demand room service model at a large tertiary public hospital. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of quality assurance data compared thaw-retherm to room service. Nutritional intake and plate waste were measured using a visual intake analysis tool; production waste was measured using weighted analysis methodology; patient satisfaction was measured using a validated patient satisfaction survey; meal quality was assessed using a validated meal quality audit tool, and meal costs were obtained from hospital finance reports. Independent sample t-tests or nonparametric equivalent (Mann-Whitney U-test) for continuous variables and Pearson's Chi-square for categorical data were applied for comparative purposes. RESULTS: Average energy and protein intake, as well as percentage requirements met, improved between thaw-retherm and room service (4320 kJ/day vs 7265 kJ/day; 42.4 g/day vs 82.5 g/day; and 46% vs 80.7%; 49.9% vs 98.4%; all P < .001. Reductions in plate waste (40% vs 15%) and production waste (15% vs 5.6%, P < .001) were observed and food costs decreased by 9% with room service. Meal quality audit results improved, and patient satisfaction increased with % respondents satisfied increasing from 75.0% to 89.8% (χ2 9.985[2]; P = .007) for room service. CONCLUSIONS: This research demonstrates significant improvements in patient and organisational outcomes with room service compared to a thaw-retherm model in a large public hospital.