Efficacy and safety of endoscopic pyloric balloon dilation in patients with refractory gastroparesis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There has been interest in the use of pyloric therapies for the treatment of refractory gastroparesis. However, data on endoscopic pyloric dilation are scarce. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of this procedure in refractory gastroparesis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 47 patients referred for refractory gastroparesis, confirmed by gastric emptying scintigraphy, and treated with endoscopic pyloric through-the-scope balloon dilation. The primary endpoint was the effectiveness of the procedure, evaluated with the Gastric Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) at 2 and 6 months. RESULTS: A clinical response, defined by a 1.0 point decrease in the GCSI score, was observed in 25 patients at 2 months (53%) and in 19 patients at 6 months (40%). The mean GCSI score decreased significantly at 2 and 6 months compared to the preoperative score (3.9 ± 0.87 vs 2.3 ± 1.37 and 3.9 ± 0.87 vs 2.9 ± 1.27, respectively; p < 0.0001). No complication was observed. Nine patients had a delayed relapse at 1 year. A second dilation was performed for eight patients and it was effective in five of them (63%). The mean follow-up time of the patients was 27.0 ± 10.4 months. At 2 years, 15 patients still experienced improvement following this treatment (32%). No predictive factor of clinical response was identified. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of pyloric dilation is 53% at 2 months, with sustained improvement in one third of patients at 2 years. This treatment should be considered as an alternative option to pyloromyotomy.

Do Preoperative Esophageal pH Monitoring and High-Resolution Manometry Predict Symptoms of GERD After Sleeve Gastrectomy?

BACKGROUND: Predictive factors of evolution or appearance of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) have not been identified to date. We aimed to assess the evolution of GERD symptoms 1 year after SG and to determine preoperative predictive factors using high-resolution manometry (HRM) and ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring (APM). METHODS: We included 160 patients who underwent SG between 2013 and 2017 and performed preoperative APM and HRM. Positive APM was defined according to the Lyon consensus. Symptoms of GERD, proton pump inhibitors (PPI) use, weight loss (WL), and diet were recorded in all patients before and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: One year after surgery, 58 patients (36.3%) complained of GERD symptoms compared to 52 patients (32.5%) preoperatively (p=0.48). Among patients with preoperative GERD symptoms, only 26/52 patients (50%) still had symptoms, whereas 32/108 (29.6%) asymptomatic patients developed de novo GERD symptoms after surgery. PPI use increased after surgery reaching 36.9% of patients against 15.0% before (p<0.0001). Only preoperative symptoms of GERD were predictive of postoperative symptoms (OR= 2.47 [1.14-5.45]; p=0.023) in multivariate analysis. Preoperative manometric parameters, postoperative diet, and WL were not related to postoperative symptoms. In asymptomatic patients before surgery, silent GERD (positive APM without symptom) was predictive of postoperative GERD symptoms (OR=2.69 [1.00-7.25]; p=0.049). CONCLUSION: Evolution of GERD symptoms after SG reveals improvement for half of the patients and de novo GERD symptoms in one-third of patients. Predictive factors of postoperative symptoms are preoperative symptoms and positive preoperative APM in asymptomatic patients.

The Role of Diet in Functional Dyspepsia Management.

Functional dyspepsia is a common functional gastrointestinal disease that is characterized by postprandial fullness, early satiation, epigastric pain, and/or epigastric burning. Eating a meal is a key factor in the occurrence of symptoms during functional dyspepsia, and patients frequently request dietary advice that could relieve these symptoms. Eating behaviors, irregular meal patterns, and moderate-to-fast eating rates are significantly associated with functional dyspepsia. The role of diet is complex; fat ingestion increases the occurrence of symptoms in dyspeptic patients, which might be affected by cognitive factors and palatability. Data concerning the role of carbohydrates are conflicting. Wheat may induce symptoms in patients with nonceliac gluten/wheat sensitivity, and gluten-free diets might be beneficial. Data concerning the role of FODMAPs (Fructo, Oligo, Di-, Monosaccharides, And Polyols) in functional dyspepsia are lacking; however, as there is a frequent overlap between functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome, a diet that is low in FODMAPs might be useful in relieving some symptoms. Data concerning alcohol are also conflicting. Adherence to a Mediterranean diet seems to be associated with a decrease in dyspepsia symptoms. Finally, data concerning diet modifications are conflicting, and the impact of diet modifications on symptom intensity or frequency has never been reported in randomized prospective studies. Common sense dietary recommendations, such as eating slowly and regularly, as well as decreasing the fat content of meals, can be provided in daily clinical practice.