A Case Report of Combat Blast Injury Requiring Combat Casualty Care, Far-Forward ECMO, Air Transport, and All Levels of Military Critical Care.

We describe a 34-year-old soldier who sustained a blast injury in Syria resulting in tracheal 5 cm tracheal loss, cervical spine and cord injury with tetraplegia, multiple bilateral rib fractures, esophageal injury, traumatic brain injury, globe evisceration, and multiple extremity soft tissue and musculoskeletal injuries including a left tibia fracture with compartment syndrome. An emergent intubation of the transected trachea was performed in the field, and the patient was resuscitated with whole blood prehospital. During transport to the Role 2, the patient required cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest. On arrival, he underwent a resuscitative thoracotomy and received a massive transfusion exclusively with whole blood. A specialized critical care team transported the patient to the Role 3 hospital in Baghdad, and the DoD extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) team was activated secondary to his unstable airway and severe hypoxia secondary to pulmonary blast injury. The casualty was cannulated in Baghdad approximately 40 hours after injury with bifemoral cannulae in a venovenous configuration. He was transported from Iraq to the U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research Burn Center in San Antonio without issue. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support was successfully weaned, and he was decannulated on ECMO day 4. The early and en route use of venovenous ECMO allowed for maintenance of respiratory support during transport and bridge to operative management and demonstrates the feasibility of prolonged ECMO transport in critically ill combat casualties.

Evolution of the United States Military Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Transport Team.

INTRODUCTION: The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for the care of critically ill adult patients has increased over the past decade. It has been utilized in more austere locations, to include combat wounded. The U.S. military established the Acute Lung Rescue Team in 2005 to transport and care for patients unable to be managed by standard medical evacuation resources. In 2012, the U.S. military expanded upon this capacity, establishing an ECMO program at Brooke Army Medical Center. To maintain currency, the program treats both military and civilian patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective review of all patients transported by the sole U.S. military ECMO program from September 2012 to December 2019. We analyzed basic demographic data, ECMO indication, transport distance range, survival to decannulation and discharge, and programmatic growth. RESULTS: The U.S. military ECMO team conducted 110 ECMO transports. Of these, 88 patients (80%) were transported to our facility and 81 (73.6%) were cannulated for ECMO by our team prior to transport. The primary indication for ECMO was respiratory failure (76%). The range of transport distance was 6.5 to 8,451 miles (median air transport distance = 1,328 miles, median ground transport distance = 16 miles). In patients who were cannulated remotely, survival to decannulation was 76% and survival to discharge was 73.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of the U.S. military ECMO team has increased exponentially since January 2017. With an increased tempo of transport operations and distance of critical care transport, survival to decannulation and discharge rates exceed national benchmarks as described in ELSO published data. The ability to cannulate patients in remote locations and provide critical care transport to a military medical treatment facility has allowed the U.S. military to maintain readiness of a critical medical asset.

A 16-year neonatal/pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation transport experience.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the population and survival of neonatal and pediatric patients transported by Wilford Hall Medical Center (WHMC) on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) since 1985. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart, literature, and database review of pediatric and neonatal patients transported on ECMO by the WHMC ECMO transport team. In addition, a subpopulation analysis was performed comparing neonates with meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) placed on ECMO at WHMC with those infants with MAS transported on ECMO. Characteristics of interest for this comparison included disease severity before ECMO, age at initiation of ECMO, survival, ECMO-related complications, and duration of ECMO support. RESULTS: Forty-two patients transported on ECMO were identified: 23 neonatal respiratory cases (survival 57%), 7 pediatric respiratory cases (survival 71%), 4 cardiac cases (survival 50%), and 8 extra-institutional ECMO transports (survival 63%). In the MAS subpopulation, there was significantly greater survival in the in-house group--97% (31/32)--than in the ECMO transport group--75% (9/12); there were no other significant differences between these groups. Overall, no ECMO-related complications leading to patient demise could be identified in the ECMO transport group. CONCLUSIONS: ECMO transport, although demonstrating acceptable survival, is a risk-laden modality that should not replace early referral to an ECMO center.