Understanding functions of eEF1 translation elongation factors beyond translation. A proteomic approach.

Mammalian translation elongation factors eEF1A1 and eEF1A2 are 92% homologous isoforms whose mutually exclusive tissue-specific expression is regulated during development. The isoforms have similar translation functionality, but show differences in spatial organization and participation in various processes, such as oncogenesis and virus reproduction. The differences may be due to their ability to interact with isoform-specific partner proteins. We used the identified sets of eEF1A1 or eEF1A2 partner proteins to identify cell complexes and/or processes specific to one particular isoform. As a result, we found isoform-specific interactions reflecting the involvement of different eEF1A isoforms in different cellular processes, including actin-related, chromatin-remodeling, ribonuclease H2, adenylyl cyclase, and Cul3-RING ubiquitin ligase complexes as well as initiation of mitochondrial transcription. An essential by-product of our analysis is the elucidation of a number of cellular processes beyond protein biosynthesis, where both isoforms appear to participate such as large ribosomal subunit biogenesis, mRNA splicing, DNA mismatch repair, 26S proteasome activity, P-body and exosomes formation, protein targeting to the membrane. This information suggests that a relatively high content of eEF1A in the cell may be necessary not only to maintain efficient translation, but also to ensure its participation in various cellular processes, where some roles of eEF1A have not yet been described. We believe that the data presented here will be useful for deciphering new auxiliary functions of eEF1A and its isoforms, and provide a new look at the known non-canonical functions of this main component of the human translation-elongation machinery.

Quaternary organization of the human eEF1B complex reveals unique multi-GEF domain assembly.

Protein synthesis in eukaryotic cell is spatially and structurally compartmentalized that ensures high efficiency of this process. One of the distinctive features of higher eukaryotes is the existence of stable multi-protein complexes of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and translation elongation factors. Here, we report a quaternary organization of the human guanine-nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) complex, eEF1B, comprising α, ß and γ subunits that specifically associate into a heterotrimeric form eEF1B(αßγ)3. As both the eEF1Bα and eEF1Bß proteins have structurally conserved GEF domains, their total number within the complex is equal to six. Such, so far, unique structural assembly of the guanine-nucleotide exchange factors within a stable complex may be considered as a 'GEF hub' that ensures efficient maintenance of the translationally active GTP-bound conformation of eEF1A in higher eukaryotes.

Non-translational Connections of eEF1B in the Cytoplasm and Nucleus of Cancer Cells.

The human translation machinery includes three types of supramolecular complexes involved in elongation of the polypeptide chain: the ribosome, complex of elongation factors eEF1B and multienzyme aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complex. Of the above, eEF1B is the least investigated assembly. Recently, a number of studies provided some insights into the structure of different eEF1B subunits and changes in their expression in cancer and other diseases. There is increasing agreement that possible disease-related functions of eEF1B are not necessarily related to its role in translation. This mini-review focuses on structural and functional features of the eEF1B complex while paying special attention to possible non-canonical functions of its subunits in cancer cells.

The protein-binding N-terminal domain of human translation elongation factor 1Bß possesses a dynamic α-helical structural organization.

Translation elongation factor 1Bß (eEF1Bß) is a metazoan-specific protein involved into the macromolecular eEF1B complex, containing also eEF1Bα and eEF1Bγ subunits. Both eEF1Bα and eEF1Bß ensure the guanine nucleotide exchange on eEF1A while eEF1Bγ is thought to have a structural role. The structures of the eEF1Bß catalytic C-terminal domain and neighboring central acidic region are known while the structure of the protein-binding N-terminal domain remains unidentified which prevents clear understanding of architecture of the eEF1B complex. Here we show that the N-terminal domain comprising initial 77 amino acids of eEF1Bß, eEF1Bß(1-77), is a monomer in solution with increased hydrodynamic volume. This domain binds eEF1Bγ in equimolar ratio. The CD spectra reveal that the secondary structure of eEF1Bß(1-77) consists predominantly of α-helices and a portion of disordered region. Very rapid hydrogen/deuterium exchange for all eEF1Bß(1-77) peptides favors a flexible tertiary organization of eEF1Bß(1-77). Computational modeling of eEF1Bß(1-77) suggests several conformation states each composed of three α-helices connected by flexible linkers. Altogether, the data imply that the protein-binding domain of eEF1Bß shows flexible spatial organization which may be needed for interaction with eEF1Bγ or other protein partners.

mRNA-Independent way to regulate translation elongation rate in eukaryotic cells.

The question of what governs the translation elongation rate in eukaryotes has not yet been completely answered. Earlier, different availability of different tRNAs was considered as a main factor involved, however, recent data revealed that the elongation rate does not always depend on tRNA availability. Here, we offer another, codon-independent approach to explain specific tRNA-dependence of the elongation rate in eukaryotes. We hypothesize that the exit rate of eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1A (eEF1A)*GDP from the 80S ribosome depends on the protein affinity to specific aminoacyl-tRNA remaining on the ribosome after GTP hydrolysis. Subsequently, a slower dissociation of eEF1A*GDP from certain aminoacyl-tRNAs in the ribosome can negatively influence the ribosomal elongation rate in a tRNA-dependent and mRNA-independent way. The specific tRNA-dependent departure rate of eEF1A*GDP from the ribosome is suggested to be a novel factor contributing to the overall translation elongation control in eukaryotic cells. © 2018 IUBMB Life, 70(3):192-196, 2018.

Comparison of the ability of mammalian eEF1A1 and its oncogenic variant eEF1A2 to interact with actin and calmodulin.

The question as to why a protein exerts oncogenic properties is answered mainly by well-established ideas that these proteins interfere with cellular signaling pathways. However, the knowledge about structural and functional peculiarities of the oncoproteins causing these effects is far from comprehensive. The 97.5% homologous tissue-specific A1 and A2 isoforms of mammalian translation elongation factor eEF1A represent an interesting model to study a difference between protein variants of a family that differ in oncogenic potential. We propose that the different oncogenic impact of A1 and A2 might be explained by differences in their ability to communicate with their respective cellular partners. Here we probed this hypothesis by studying the interaction of eEF1A with two known partners - calmodulin and actin. Indeed, an inability of the A2 isoform to interact with calmodulin is shown, while calmodulin is capable of binding A1 and interferes with its tRNA-binding and actin-bundling activities in vitro. Both A1 and A2 variants revealed actin-bundling activity; however, the form of bundles formed in the presence of A1 or A2 was distinctly different. Thus, a potential inability of A2 to be controlled by Ca2+-mediated regulatory systems is revealed.

A non-catalytic N-terminal domain negatively influences the nucleotide exchange activity of translation elongation factor 1Bα.

Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1Bα (eEF1Bα) is a functional homolog of the bacterial factor EF-Ts, and is a component of the macromolecular eEF1B complex. eEF1Bα functions as a catalyst of guanine nucleotide exchange on translation elongation factor 1A (eEF1A). The C-terminal domain of eEF1Bα is necessary and sufficient for its catalytic activity, whereas the N-terminal domain interacts with eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1Bγ (eEF1Bγ) to form a tight complex. However, eEF1Bγ has been shown to enhance the catalytic activity of eEF1Bα attributed to the C-terminal domain of eEF1Bα. This suggests that the N-terminal domain of eEF1Bα may in some way influence the guanine nucleotide exchange process. We have shown that full-length recombinant eEF1Bα and its truncated forms are non-globular proteins with elongated shapes. Truncation of the N-terminal domain of eEF1Bα, which is dispensable for catalytic activity, resulted in acceleration of the rate of guanine nucleotide exchange on eEF1A compared to full-length eEF1Bα. A similar effect on the catalytic activity of eEF1Bα was observed after its interaction with eEF1Bγ. We suggest that the non-catalytic N-terminal domain of eEF1Bα may interfere with eEF1A binding to the C-terminal catalytic domain, resulting in a decrease in the overall rate of the guanine nucleotide exchange reaction. Formation of a tight complex between the eEF1Bγ and eEF1Bα N-terminal domains abolishes this inhibitory effect.

Translation elongation factor eEF1A1 is a novel partner of a multifunctional protein Sgt1.

Mammalian translation elongation factor eEF1A is involved in ribosomal polypeptide synthesis. Also, the protein fulfills many additional duties in an eukaryotic cell. Here, we identified a novel partner of the eEF1A1 isoform, namely Sgt1, a protein that possesses co-chaperon properties and participates in antiviral defense processes. By applying different methods, we demonstrated the interaction between eEF1A1 and Sgt1 using both purified proteins and cell lysates. We also found that the D2 and D3 domains of eEF1A1 and the TPR domain of Sgt1 are involved in complex formation. Modeling of the Sgt1-eEF1A1 complex suggested both shape and charge complementarities of the eEF1A1-Sgt1 interface stabilized by a number of salt bridges. As long as such interaction mode is typical more for protein-nucleic acid interaction we suggested a possibility that Sgt1 competes with viral RNA for binding to eEF1A and obtained in vitro evidence to this effect.

Truncation of the A,A(∗),A' helices segment impairs the actin bundling activity of mammalian eEF1A1.

Translation elongation factor eEF1A is a G-protein which has a crucial role in the ribosomal polypeptide elongation and possesses a number of non-translational functions. Here, we show that the A,A(∗),A' helices segment of mammalian eEF1A is dispensable for the eEF1A*eEF1Bα complex formation. The A,A(∗),A' helices region did not interact with actin; however, its removal eliminates the actin bundling activity of eEF1A, probably due to the destruction of a dimeric structure of eEF1A. The translation function of monomers and the actin-bundling function of dimers of mammalian eEF1A is suggested.

Independent overexpression of the subunits of translation elongation factor complex eEF1H in human lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The constituents of stable multiprotein complexes are known to dissociate from the complex to play independent regulatory roles. The components of translation elongation complex eEF1H (eEF1A, eEF1Bα, eEF1Bß, eEF1Bγ) were found overexpressed in different cancers. To gain the knowledge about novel cancer-related translational mechanisms we intended to reveal whether eEF1H exists as a single unit or independent subunits in different human cancers. METHODS: The changes in the expression level of every subunit of eEF1H in the human non-small-cell lung cancer tissues were examined. The localization of eEF1H subunits was assessed by immunohistochemistry methods, subcellular fractionation and confocal microscopy. The possibility of the interaction between the subunits was estimated by co-immunoprecipitation. RESULTS: The level of eEF1Bß expression was increased more than two-fold in 36%, eEF1Bγ in 28%, eEF1A in 20% and eEF1Bα in 8% of tumor specimens. The cancer-induced alterations in the subunits level were found to be uncoordinated, therefore the increase in the level of at least one subunit of eEF1H was observed in 52% of samples. Nuclear localization of eEF1Bß in the cancer rather than distal normal looking tissues was found. In cancer tissue, eEF1A and eEF1Bα were not found in nuclei while all four subunits of eEF1H demonstrated both cytoplasmic and nuclear appearance in the lung carcinoma cell line A549. Unexpectedly, in the A549 nuclear fraction eEF1A lost the ability to interact with the eEF1B complex. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest independent functioning of some fraction of the eEF1H subunits in human tumors. The absence of eEF1A and eEF1B interplay in nuclei of A549 cells is a first evidence for non-translational role of nuclear-localized subunits of eEF1B. We conclude the appearance of the individual eEF1B subunits in tumors is a more general phenomenon than appreciated before and thus is a novel signal of cancer-related changes in translation apparatus.

Mammalian translation elongation factor eEF1A2: X-ray structure and new features of GDP/GTP exchange mechanism in higher eukaryotes.

Eukaryotic elongation factor eEF1A transits between the GTP- and GDP-bound conformations during the ribosomal polypeptide chain elongation. eEF1A*GTP establishes a complex with the aminoacyl-tRNA in the A site of the 80S ribosome. Correct codon-anticodon recognition triggers GTP hydrolysis, with subsequent dissociation of eEF1A*GDP from the ribosome. The structures of both the 'GTP'- and 'GDP'-bound conformations of eEF1A are unknown. Thus, the eEF1A-related ribosomal mechanisms were anticipated only by analogy with the bacterial homolog EF-Tu. Here, we report the first crystal structure of the mammalian eEF1A2*GDP complex which indicates major differences in the organization of the nucleotide-binding domain and intramolecular movements of eEF1A compared to EF-Tu. Our results explain the nucleotide exchange mechanism in the mammalian eEF1A and suggest that the first step of eEF1A*GDP dissociation from the 80S ribosome is the rotation of the nucleotide-binding domain observed after GTP hydrolysis.

Different oligomeric properties and stability of highly homologous A1 and proto-oncogenic A2 variants of mammalian translation elongation factor eEF1.

Translation elongation factor 1A (eEF1A) directs aminoacyl-tRNA to the A site of 80S ribosomes. In addition, more than 97% homologous variants of eEF1A, A1 and A2, whose expression in different tissues is mutually exclusive, may fulfill a number of independent moonlighting functions in the cell; for instance, the unusual appearance of A2 in an A1-expressing tissue was recently linked to the induction of carcinogenesis. The structural background explaining the different functional performance of the highly homologous proteins is unclear. Here, the main difference in the structural properties of these proteins was revealed to be the improved ability of A1 to self-associate, as demonstrated by synchrotron small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and analytical ultracentrifugation. Besides, the SAXS measurements at different urea concentrations revealed the low resistance of the A1 protein to urea. Titration of the proteins by hydrophobic dye 8-anilino-1-naphthalenesulfonate showed that the A1 isoform is more hydrophobic than A2. As the different association properties, lipophilicity, and stability of the highly similar eEF1A variants did not influence considerably their translation functions, at least in vitro, we suggest this difference may indicate a structural background for isoform-specific moonlighting roles.

From global phosphoproteomics to individual proteins: the case of translation elongation factor eEF1A.

Phosphoproteomics is often aimed at deciphering the modified components of signaling pathways in certain organisms, tissues and pathologies. Phosphorylation of housekeeping proteins, albeit important, usually attracts less attention. Here, we provide targeted analysis of eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1A (eEF1A), which is the main element of peptide elongation machinery. There are 97% homologous A1 and A2 isoforms of eEF1A; their expression in mammalian tissues is mutually exclusive and differentially regulated in development. The A2 isoform reveals proto-oncogenic properties and specifically interacts with some cellular proteins. Several tyrosine residues shown experimentally to be phosphorylated in eEF1A1 are hardly solution accessible, so their phosphorylation could be linked with structural rearrangement of the protein molecule. The possible role of tyrosine phosphorylation in providing the background for structural differences between the 'extended' A1 isoform and the compact oncogenic A2 isoform is discussed. The 'road map' for targeted analysis of any protein of interest using phosphoproteomics data is presented.

Caenorhabditis elegans evolves a new architecture for the multi-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complex.

MARS is an evolutionary conserved supramolecular assembly of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases found in eukaryotes. This complex was thought to be ubiquitous in the deuterostome and protostome clades of bilaterians because similar complexes were isolated from arthropods and vertebrates. However, several features of the component enzymes suggested that in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, a species grouped with arthropods in modern phylogeny, this complex might not exist, or should display a significantly different structural organization. C. elegans was also taken as a model system to study in a multicellular organism amenable to experimental approaches, the reason for existence of these supramolecular entities. Here, using a proteomic approach, we have characterized the components of MARS in C. elegans. We show that this organism evolved a specific structural organization of this complex, which contains several bona fide components of the MARS complexes known so far, but also displays significant variations. These data highlight molecular evolution events that took place after radiation of bilaterians. Remarkably, it shows that expansion of MARS assembly in metazoans is not linear, but is the result of additions but also of subtractions along evolution. We then undertook an experimental approach, using inactivation of the endogenous copy of methionyl-tRNA synthetase by RNAi and expression of transgenic variants, to understand the role in complex assembly and the in vivo functionality, of the eukaryotic-specific domains appended to aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. We show that rescue of the worms and assembly of transgenic variants into MARS rest on the presence of these appended domains.

Unbalanced expression of the translation complex eEF1 subunits in human cardioesophageal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The signalling role of individual subunits released from some stable translation multi-molecular complexes under unfavourable circumstances is known. The disease-related role of the translation elongation factor 1 complex (eEF1) as a whole is never researched; however, its subunits possess apparent regulatory potency. Whether the individual eEF1 subunits can exist and function in cell beyond the complex is not known. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The protein and mRNA levels of the A1, Bα, Bß or Bγ subunits of eEF1 were analysed by Western and Northern blot techniques in the same specimens of cardioesophageal carcinoma and correspondingly paired normal tissues. Cancer-induced changes in localization patterns of the eEF1 subunits were examined immunohistochemically. RESULTS: Changes in different eEF1 subunits expression were found to be unbalanced, indicating cancer-related emergence of individual components of the eEF1 complex. Independent overexpression of at least one eEF1 component was observed in 72% clinical samples. Noncomplexed eEF1B subunits were also detected by immunohistochemical analysis. In the normal tissue, localization of the Bα, Bß and Bγ subunits was nuclear-cytoplasmic while in the cancer tissue the only Bγ subunit stayed in nucleus. CONCLUSIONS: Our data are first to indicate that the individual subunits can exist separately from the eEF1B complex in cancer tissues and that disintegration of eEF1B could be an important sign of cancer development. Nuclear localization of Bγ both in normal and in cancer tissues suggests its previously unknown nucleus-specific role in human cells.

Methionyl-tRNA synthetase from Caenorhabditis elegans: a specific multidomain organization for convergent functional evolution.

Methionyl-tRNA synthetase (MetRS) is a multidomain protein that specifically binds tRNAMet and catalyzes the synthesis of methionyl-tRNAMet. The minimal, core enzyme found in Aquifex aeolicus is made of a catalytic domain, which catalyzes the aminoacylation reaction, and an anticodon-binding domain, which promotes tRNA-protein association. In eukaryotes, additional domains are appended in cis or in trans to the core enzyme and increase the stability of the tRNA-protein complexes. Eventually, as observed for MetRS from Homo sapiens, the C-terminal appended domain causes a slow release of aminoacyl-tRNA and establishes a limiting step in the global aminoacylation reaction. Here, we report that MetRS from the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans displays a new type of structural organization. Its very C-terminal appended domain is related to the oligonucleotide binding-fold-based tRNA-binding domain (tRBD) recovered at the C-terminus of MetRS from plant, but, in the nematode enzyme, this domain is separated from the core enzyme by an insertion domain. Gel retardation and tRNA aminoacylation experiments show that MetRS from nematode is functionally related to human MetRS despite the fact that their appended tRBDs have distinct structural folds, and are not orthologs. Thus, functional convergence of human and nematode MetRS is the result of parallel and convergent evolution that might have been triggered by the selective pressure to invent processivity of tRNA handling in translation in higher eukaryotes.

Dynamic Organization of Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase Complexes in the Cytoplasm of Human Cells.

The localization in space and in time of proteins within the cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells is a central question of the cellular compartmentalization of metabolic pathways. The assembly of proteins within stable or transient complexes plays an essential role in this process. Here, we examined the subcellular localization of the multi-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complex in human cells. The sequestration of its components within the cytoplasm rests on the presence of the eukaryotic-specific polypeptide extensions that characterize the human enzymes, as compared with their prokaryotic counterparts. The cellular mobility of several synthetases, assessed by measuring fluorescence recovery after photobleaching, suggested that they are not freely diffusible within the cytoplasm. Several of these enzymes, isolated by tandem affinity purification, were copurified with ribosomal proteins and actin. The capacity of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases to interact with polyribosomes and with the actin cytoskeleton impacts their subcellular localization and mobility. Our observations have conceptual implications for understanding how translation machinery is organized in vivo.

Dissection of the structural organization of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complex.

The spatio-temporal organization of proteins within the cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells rests in part on the assembly of stable and transient multiprotein complexes. Here we examined the assembly of the multiaminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complex (MARS) in human cells. This complex contains nine aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and three auxiliary proteins and is a hallmark of metazoan species. Isolation of the complexes has been performed by tandem affinity purification from human cells in culture. To understand the rules of assembly of this particle, expression of the three nonsynthetase components of MARS, p18, p38, and p43, was blocked by stable small interfering RNA silencing. The lack of these components was not lethal for the cells, but cell growth was slightly reduced. The residual complexes that could form in vivo in the absence of the auxiliary proteins were isolated by tandem affinity purification. From the repertoire of the subcomplexes that could be isolated, a comprehensive map of protein-protein interactions mediating complex assembly is deduced. The data are consistent with a structural role of the three nonsynthetase components of MARS, with p38 connecting two subcomplexes that may form in the absence of p38.

Multiple molecular dynamics simulation of the isoforms of human translation elongation factor 1A reveals reversible fluctuations between "open" and "closed" conformations and suggests specific for eEF1A1 affinity for Ca2+-calmodulin.

BACKGROUND: Eukaryotic translation elongation factor eEF1A directs the correct aminoacyl-tRNA to ribosomal A-site. In addition, eEF1A is involved in carcinogenesis and apoptosis and can interact with large number of non-translational ligands. There are two isoforms of eEF1A, which are 98% similar. Despite the strong similarity, the isoforms differ in some properties. Importantly, the appearance of eEF1A2 in tissues in which the variant is not normally expressed can be coupled to cancer development.We reasoned that the background for the functional difference of eEF1A1 and eEF1A2 might lie in changes of dynamics of the isoforms. RESULTS: It has been determined by multiple MD simulation that eEF1A1 shows increased reciprocal flexibility of structural domains I and II and less average distance between the domains, while increased non-correlated diffusive atom motions within protein domains characterize eEF1A2. The divergence in the dynamic properties of eEF1A1 and eEF1A2 is caused by interactions of amino acid residues that differ between the two variants with neighboring residues and water environment. The main correlated motion of both protein isoforms is the change in proximity of domains I and II which can lead to disappearance of the gap between the domains and transition of the protein into a "closed" conformation. Such a transition is reversible and the protein can adopt an "open" conformation again. This finding is in line with our earlier experimental observation that the transition between "open" and "closed" conformations of eEF1A could be essential for binding of tRNA and/or other biological ligands. The putative calmodulin-binding region Asn311-Gly327 is less flexible in eEF1A1 implying its increased affinity for calmodulin. The ability of eEF1A1 rather than eEF1A2 to interact with Ca2+/calmodulin is shown experimentally in an ELISA-based test. CONCLUSION: We have found that reversible transitions between "open" and "close" conformations of eEF1A provide a molecular background for the earlier observation that the eEF1A molecule is able to change the shape upon interaction with tRNA. The ability of eEF1A1 rather than eEF1A2 to interact with calmodulin is predicted by MD analysis and showed experimentally. The differential ability of the eEF1A isoforms to interact with signaling molecules discovered in this study could be associated with cancer-related properties of eEF1A2.

A2 isoform of mammalian translation factor eEF1A displays increased tyrosine phosphorylation and ability to interact with different signalling molecules.

The eEF1A1 and eEF1A2 isoforms of translation elongation factor 1A have 98% similarity and perform the same protein synthesis function catalyzing codon-dependent binding of aminoacyl-tRNA to 80S ribosome. However, the isoforms apparently play different non-canonical roles in apoptosis and cancer development which are awaiting further investigations. We hypothesize that the difference in non-translational functions could be caused, in particular, by differential ability of the isoforms to be involved in phosphotyrosine-mediated signalling. The ability of eEF1A1 and eEF1A2 to interact with SH2 and SH3 domains of different signalling molecules in vitro was compared. Indeed, contrary to eEF1A1, eEF1A2 was able to interact with SH2 domains of Grb2, RasGAP, Shc and C-terminal part of Shp2 as well as with SH3 domains of Crk, Fgr, Fyn and phospholipase C-gamma1. Interestingly, the interaction of both isoforms with Shp2 in vivo was found using stable cell lines expressing eEF1A1-His or eEF1A2-His. The formation of a complex between endogenous eEF1A and Shp2 was also shown. Importantly, a higher level of tyrosine phosphorylation of eEF1A2 as compared to eEF1A1 was demonstrated in several independent experiments and its importance for interaction of eEF1A2 with Shp2 in vitro was revealed. Thus, despite the fact that both isoforms of eEF1A could be involved in the phosphotyrosine-mediated processes, eEF1A2 apparently has greater potential to participate in such signalling pathways. Since tyrosine kinases/phosphatases play a prominent role in human cancerogenesis, our observations may gave a basis for recently found oncogenicity of the eEF1A2 isoform.