Results of the British Society of Gastroenterology supporting women in gastroenterology mentoring scheme pilot.

INTRODUCTION: Mentorship has long been recognised as beneficial in the business world and has more recently been endorsed by medical and academic professional bodies. Recruitment of women into gastroenterology and leadership roles has traditionally been difficult. The Supporting Women in Gastroenterology network developed this pilot scheme for female gastroenterologists 5 years either side of the Completion Certificate of Specialist Training (CCST) to examine the role that mentorship could play in improving this discrepancy. METHOD: Female gastroenterology trainees and consultant gastroenterologists within 5 years either side of CCST were invited to participate as mentees. Consultant gastroenterologists of both genders were invited to become mentors. 35 pairs of mentor:mentees were matched and completed the scheme over 1 year. Training was provided. RESULTS: The majority of the mentees found the sessions useful (82%) and enjoyable (77%), with the benefit of having time and space to discuss professional or personal challenges with a gastroenterologist who is not a colleague. In the longitudinal study of job satisfaction, work engagement, burnout, resilience, self-efficacy, self-compassion and work-life balance, burnout scale showed a small but non significant improvement over the year (probably an effect of small sample size). Personal accomplishment improved significantly. The main challenges were geography, available time to meet and pair matching. The majority of mentors surveyed found the scheme effective, satisfying, mutually beneficial (70%) and enjoyable (78%). CONCLUSION: Mentorship is shown to be beneficial despite the challenges and is likely to improve the recruitment and retention of women into gastroenterology and leadership roles, but is likely to benefit gastroenterologists of both genders.

Nutritional training in gastroenterology.

Despite the clear importance of nutritional knowledge for health professionals, such education has long been notoriously patchy at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels. Gastroenterologists in particular have a special responsibility to provide advice and expertise, not only in general nutrition but also in artificial nutrition support in the setting of extreme risk of malnutrition and intestinal failure. Recently, with the restructuring of undergraduate medical teaching and the advent of modernising medical careers, curricula have been examined in detail and training programmes have become competency based. These changes, together with increasing public expectations regarding both the importance of nutrition and ability of doctors to provide advice and guidance, have provided an opportunity to reassess nutritional training at all levels of medical education. In this review, the authors consider the factors which may have hindered the progression of nutritional education for doctors, and gastroenterologists in particular, as well as the steps which have been taken in recent years to address these issues and move such training forward. There is now a real opportunity to improve the quality of nutrition training in gastroenterology. If this can be achieved, all gastroenterologists of the future, instead of shrinking from difficult nutritional issues, should be able to manage them with confidence and enthusiasm no matter what their subspecialty; indeed, an increasing proportion may become nutrition subspecialists in their own right.