Clinical concepts for treatment of the elbow in the adolescent overhead athlete.

Injuries to the adolescent elbow are common because of the repetitive overuse inherent in many overhead sport activities. The management of these patients is greatly facilitated through a greater understanding of the demands placed on the upper extremity kinetic chain during these overhead activities as well as a detailed examination and rehabilitation for the entire upper extremity kinetic chain. Particular emphasis on improving rotator cuff strength and muscular endurance, along with scapular stabilization, is a critical part of elbow rehabilitation in these patients. In addition, the use of a strategic and progressive interval sport return program is necessary to minimize reinjury and return the adolescent overhead athlete to full function.

Management of acute glenohumeral dislocations.

The glenohumeral joint is the most commonly dislocated joint in the human body. Glenohumeral joint dislocations account for a large number of orthopedic consultations in inpatient and outpatient settings. A thorough workup is required for accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment of this injury. Complete history and physical examination and radiographic studies are essential, and reduction should always be attempted. In this article, we review the literature for each phase of the workup for glenohumeral dislocation and describe the anatomy, biomechanics, and basic science of the injury. Featured is a detailed synopsis of the more commonly used reduction maneuvers plus their risks and success rates.

Biomechanical evaluation of volar locking plates for distal radius fractures.

PURPOSE: Fixed-angle devices have been a major advancement in orthopedic fracture care and have become an attractive option for fixation of distal radius fractures. Several volar locking plates exist, but there is insufficient literature comparing the strengths of these plates. This study compares the biomechanical strength of two popular volar locking plate systems (Synthes LCP and Hand Innovations DVR-A) along with a nonlocking volar T-plate (Synthes). METHODS: Twenty-three formalin-fixed cadaveric forearms were divided into three groups with similar ages and bone densities. An unstable extra-articular fracture was created using a standardized osteotomy. Each group was fixed with one of the three plates. Each specimen was loaded in axial compression for 2000 cycles at a force of 400 N. Each specimen that completed cyclic testing was loaded to failure. Stiffness, yield point, and ultimate strength were recorded for each construct. RESULTS: Each fixed-angle construct completed all 2000 cycles. The nonlocking plates failed at an average of 560 cycles. The mean stiffness of the DVR-A, LCP, and the volar T-plates were 277.00, 343.17, and 175.67 N/mm, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between both fixed-angle plates and the nonlocking plate (p < 0.05). The difference between each fixed-angle construct did not reach significance. Yield point and ultimate strength could only be determined for the two fixed-angle devices. There was no statistically significant difference between the constructs for both yield point (DVR-A = 855.56 N, LCP = 894.15 N) and ultimate strength (DVR-A = 1,021.97 N, LCP = 1,114.87 N). CONCLUSIONS: Given our data, fixed-angle constructs withstand cyclical loading representing normal physiologic forces encountered during post-operative rehabilitation. There was no significant biomechanical difference between the two fixed-angle constructs. Our results support that volar fixed-angle locking plates are an effective treatment for unstable extra-articular distal radius fractures, allowing early postoperative rehabilitation to safely be initiated.

Single-row modified mason-allen versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical and surface area comparison.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the time-zero biomechanical strength and the surface area of repair between a single-row modified Mason-Allen rotator cuff repair and a double-row arthroscopic repair. METHODS: Six matched pairs of sheep infraspinatus tendons were repaired by both techniques. Pressure-sensitive film was used to measure the surface area of repair for each configuration. Specimens were biomechanically tested with cyclic loading from 20 N to 30 N for 20 cycles and were loaded to failure at a rate of 1 mm/s. Failure was defined at 5 mm of gap formation. RESULTS: Double-row suture anchor fixation restored a mean surface area of 258.23 +/- 69.7 mm(2) versus 148.08 +/- 75.5 mm(2) for single-row fixation, a 74% increase (P = .025). Both repairs had statistically similar time-zero biomechanics. There was no statistical difference in peak-to-peak displacement or elongation during cyclic loading. Single-row fixation showed a higher mean load to failure (110.26 +/- 26.4 N) than double-row fixation (108.93 +/- 21.8 N). This was not statistically significant (P = .932). All specimens failed at the suture-tendon interface. CONCLUSIONS: Double-row suture anchor fixation restores a greater percentage of the anatomic footprint when compared with a single-row Mason-Allen technique. The time-zero biomechanical strength was not significantly different between the 2 study groups. This study suggests that the 2 factors are independent of each other. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surface area and biomechanical strength of fixation are 2 independent factors in the outcome of rotator cuff repair. Maximizing both factors may increase the likelihood of complete tendon-bone healing and ultimately improve clinical outcomes. For smaller tears, a single-row modified Mason-Allen suture technique may provide sufficient strength, but for large amenable tears, a double row can provide both strength and increased surface area for healing.

Determination of anterior labral repair stress during passive arm motion in a cadaveric model.

PURPOSE: The actual forces encountered at the labrum after anterior labral repair have yet to be quantified. The purpose of this study was to determine the amount of force experienced at the glenoid-labrum interface with passive range of motion after an isolated Bankart repair and Bankart repair with capsular shift. METHODS: In 12 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders, anterior-inferior labral tears were created and then instrumented with a modified load cell. The labral lesions were repaired with either an anatomic "labral only" technique or a labral repair along with a capsular shift by use of a transglenoid technique. Shoulders were then taken through a series of movements (forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and abduction and then external rotation) simulating passive range-of-motion rehabilitation while force measurements were taken. Maximum force (in Newtons) on the simulated repairs was recorded. RESULTS: The forces experienced at the labrum showed a statistically significant difference between the group that underwent anatomic "labral only" repair and the group that underwent labral repair with capsular shift. The greatest mean force experienced (17.7 N) was in shoulders undergoing the labral repair with capsular shift with the arm in abduction and external rotation. CONCLUSIONS: In a transglenoid suture repair technique, the forces experienced at the repair site were significantly less than those determined by previous authors to be necessary to result in failure of the Bankart repair. The results of this study show that the forces experienced at the glenoid-labrum interface are higher when a capsular shift is included with a labral repair as opposed to labral repair alone. This difference was statistically significant. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These data suggest that early postoperative rehabilitation may safely allow greater passive range of motion than is presently accepted.

A biomechanical comparison of the modified Mason-Allen stitch and massive cuff stitch in vitro.

PURPOSE: The suture-tendon interface is generally regarded as the weak link in rotator cuff fixation. High rates of failure in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair have led to a search for strong yet easy-to-perform suture configurations. The goal of this study was to compare the strength of 2 commonly used suture configurations, the modified Mason-Allen stitch and the massive cuff stitch, when suture-anchored into bone. METHODS: Fourteen sheep shoulders were harvested and the infraspinatus tendon isolated. Each infraspinatus tendon was split in half longitudinally along the axis of its fibers to yield 2 tendon-bone specimens per shoulder, for a total of 28 specimens. Each split tendon was then repaired by use of a double-loaded suture anchor with a modified Mason-Allen and simple suture in one specimen and the massive cuff stitch in the other. Each specimen was initially cyclically loaded on a vertical MTS uniaxial load frame (MTS Systems, Eden Prairie, MN) under force control from 5 to 30 N at 0.25 Hz for 20 cycles. Each specimen was then loaded to failure under displacement control at a rate of 1 mm/s. Peak-to-peak displacement, cyclic elongation, ultimate tensile load, stiffness, and mode of failure were recorded. A repeated-measures analysis of variance was performed, with an alpha level of significance set at P < .05. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found with regard to ultimate load to failure between the modified Mason-Allen stitch (110.4 +/- 55.1 N) and massive cuff stitch (116.4 +/- 37.9 N). In addition, no statistically significant difference was found with regard to cyclic elongation, peak-to-peak displacement, or initial displacement. The most common mode of failure for both suture configurations was suture pullout. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Mason-Allen stitch and massive cuff stitch yield similar biomechanical profiles when suture-anchored into bone. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The massive cuff stitch may be a simpler and biomechanically equivalent alternative to the modified Mason-Allen stitch in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.