Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
COPD ; 4(2): 127-34, 2007 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17530506

RESUMO

Recent retrospective studies have suggested that use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) may improve survival in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), particularly when combined with a long-acting beta-agonist (LABA). However, the study methodologies have been questioned, and no study has examined the survival effect of the newer combination ICS/LABA inhalers. The goal of this project was to further examine the relationship between ICS treatment, with or without LABA, and survival in COPD. COPD patients were identified from the administrative databases of four different integrated health care delivery systems. All patients who were diagnosed with COPD between September 1, 2000 and August 31, 2001 and who had at least 3 months treatment with either a combined fluticasone/salmeterol inhaler (FSI, N=866), any ICS used with a LABA (ICS/LABA, N=525), ICS alone (N=742), LABA alone (N=531), or a short-acting bronchodilator alone (SABD, N=1832), were included. Analyses were conducted using three different analysis approaches that adjust for various biases that may affect the results. In the basic Cox proportional hazards models, use of FSI, ICS/LABA, ICS alone, and LABA alone had significant survival benefits as compared to SABD, after adjustment for differences in age, gender, comorbidities, asthma status, and disease severity (HRs 0.61 [0.45-0.83], 0.59 [0.46-0.77], 0.76 [0.61-0.95], 0.75 [0.57-0.98], respectively). Propensity score matching to reduce the clinical differences between the treatment groups versus the SABD reference group found very similar results. Nested case-control analyses, which are based on survival status instead of treatment, continued to show a significant survival benefit for FSI, ICS/LABA, and ICS alone. Treatment with FSI or another ICS with or without LABA is associated with improved survival in COPD. The treatment benefit is reproducible and is robust to application of a number of different analysis techniques designed to adjust for differences in confounding variables and for bias by indication.


Assuntos
Agonistas Adrenérgicos beta/administração & dosagem , Albuterol/análogos & derivados , Androstadienos/administração & dosagem , Broncodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/mortalidade , Administração por Inalação , Adulto , Idoso , Albuterol/administração & dosagem , Estudos de Coortes , Combinação de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Combinação Fluticasona-Salmeterol , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida
2.
Epilepsia ; 46(2): 311-9, 2005 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15679513

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to apply computer algorithms to an administrative data set to identify the prevalence of epilepsy, incidence of epilepsy, and epilepsy-related mortality of patients in a managed care organization (MCO). METHODS: The study population consisted of members enrolled in Lovelace Health Plan, a component of Lovelace Health Systems, a statewide MCO headquartered in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Patient records were obtained from July 1996 to June 2001. Four logistic regression models with high sensitivity and specificity were applied to 1-, 3-, and 5-year time frames in which members were continuously enrolled in the MCO. Incidence was defined for patients who did not have an epilepsy-associated code in the 18 months before the first diagnosis entry. Mortality estimates in the population also were assessed by using a matched control group and linkage to a statewide death registry. RESULTS: The data yielded estimated prevalence rates of 7-10 per 1,000, depending on age, sex, ethnicity, and time interval. Annualized incidence was 47 per 100,000 for members continuously enrolled for 3 years and 71 per 100,000 for members continuously enrolled for 5 years. Crude mortality rates were 2-2.5 times higher for epilepsy patients identified with the algorithms than for the matched controls. Conditional logistic regression indicated that the odds of death for epilepsy patients as compared with controls ranged from 1.24 to 2.06. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate estimation of prevalence, incidence, and mortality rates for epilepsy is an essential component of disease management in MCOs. The algorithms in this project can be used to monitor trends in prevalence, incidence, and mortality to inform decisions critical to improving the health care needs and quality of life for patients with epilepsy.


Assuntos
Epilepsia/epidemiologia , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Algoritmos , Causas de Morte , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Epilepsia/mortalidade , Feminino , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Incidência , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Sistemas de Informação Administrativa/estatística & dados numéricos , Computação Matemática , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New Mexico/epidemiologia , Razão de Chances , Prevalência , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...