Short- and long-term survival outcomes among never smokers who developed lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the US. While an extensive literature exists detailing lung cancer risk factors and mortality among patients with a history of tobacco use, the data are more limited among individuals who have never smoked. The purpose of this investigation is to compare survival rates between the two groups and evaluate potential risk factors among never smokers. METHODS: This retrospective study included 3380 smokers and 334 never smokers who were diagnosed with lung cancer at Stony Brook University Hospital between 2003 and 2016. 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year survival outcomes, stratified by smoking status, were compared and Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival are provided. Cox Proportional Hazard models were used to evaluate factors influencing survival among never smokers. RESULTS: Never smokers with lung cancer were more likely to be female, be diagnosed with adenocarcinoma histology, and had fewer comorbidities than lung cancer patients who smoked. Although 60% of patients were diagnosed at a later stage of disease development, regardless of smoking status, overall short- and long-term survival was significantly higher among never smokers compared to those with a history of tobacco use. In addition to age and stage at diagnosis, a history of diabetes was found to be a significant prognostic factor for decreased survival among never smokers (HR=3.15, 95% CI (1.74, 5.71)). CONCLUSIONS: Data from the present investigation suggest that, regardless of smoking status, approximately three of every five lung cancer patients are diagnosed at a later stage, and that both short- and long-term survival outcomes are significantly better among never smokers compared to those with a history of tobacco use. Additional studies are required to validate these findings and better explain the mechanistic drivers for the improved outcomes among never smokers.

Distressed Communities Index in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in an Affluent County in New York.

BACKGROUND: The clinical impact of the distressed communities index (DCI), a composite measure of economic well-being based on the U.S. zip code, is becoming increasingly recognized. Ranging from 0 (prosperous) to 100 (distressed), DCI's association with cardiovascular outcomes remains unknown. We aimed to study the association of the DCI with presentation and outcomes in adults with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVR) in an affluent county in New York. METHODS: The study population included 286 patients with severe symptomatic AS or degeneration of a bioprosthetic valve who underwent TAVR with a newer generation transcatheter heart valve (THV) from December 2015 to June 2018 at an academic tertiary medical center. DCI for each patient was derived from their primary residence zip code. Patients were classified into DCI deciles and then categorized into 4 groups. The primary and secondary outcomes of interest were 30-day, 1-year, and 3-year mortality, respectively. RESULTS: Among 286 patients studied, 26%, 28%, 28%, and 18% were categorized into DCI groups 1-4, respectively (DCI <10: n = 73; DCI 10-20: n = 81; DCI 20-30: n = 80; DCI >30: n = 52). Patients in group 4 were younger with worse kidney function compared to patients in groups 1 and 2. They also had smaller aortic annuli and were more likely to receive a smaller THV. No significant difference in hospital length of stay or distribution of in-hospital, 30-day, 1-year, and 3-year mortality was demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: While the DCI was associated with differences in the clinical and anatomic profile, it was not associated with differences in clinical outcomes in this prospective observational study of adults undergoing TAVR suggesting that access to care is the likely discriminator.

Frequency and distribution of incidental findings deemed appropriate for S modifier designation on low-dose CT in a lung cancer screening program.

PURPOSE: To describe the frequency, distribution and reporting patterns of incidental findings receiving the Lung-RADS S modifier on low-dose chest computed tomography (CT) among lung cancer screening participants. METHODS: This retrospective investigation included 581 individuals who received baseline low-dose chest CT for lung cancer screening between October 2013 and June 2017 at a single center. Incidental findings resulting in assignment of Lung-RADS S modifier were recorded as were incidental abnormalities detailed within the body of the radiology report only. A subset of 60 randomly selected CTs was reviewed by a second (blinded) radiologist to evaluate inter-rater variability of Lung-RADS reporting. RESULTS: A total of 261 (45%) participants received the Lung-RADS S modifier on baseline CT with 369 incidental findings indicated as potentially clinically significant. Coronary artery calcification was most commonly reported, accounting for 182 of the 369 (49%) findings. An additional 141 incidentalomas of the same types as these 369 findings were described in reports but were not labelled with the S modifier. Therefore, as high as 69% (402 of 581) of participants could have received the S modifier if reporting was uniform. Inter-radiologist concordance of S modifier reporting in a subset of 60 participants was poor (42% agreement, kappa = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Incidental findings are commonly identified on chest CT for lung cancer screening, yet reporting of the S modifier within Lung-RADS is inconsistent. Specific guidelines are necessary to better define potentially clinically significant abnormalities and to improve reporting uniformity.