Changes in Exercise Capacity of Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Following Treatment With Continuous Positive Airway Pressure.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) frequently complain of fatigue during exercise. Treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) ameliorates OSA-related symptoms and may reduce the burden of OSA on coexistent diseases. However, the role of CPAP on exercise capacity in OSA has not been fully investigated. AIM: The aim of this study is to assess exercise capacity in a group of newly diagnosed OSA patients, without known comorbidities, following treatment with CPAP. METHODS: Consecutively diagnosed OSA patients by polysomnography completed the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and pulmonary function testing at baseline of OSA diagnosis three months after adherence to CPAP treatment. RESULTS: A total of 40 OSA patients (Apnea-Hypopnea Index (ΑΗΙ)>15 events/hour) of whom 29 (72.5%) males with an average age of 42±2.5 years were enrolled in the study. OSA patients had a mean peak oxygen uptake (V̇O2) value of 40.3 ±8.4 ml/kg/min (77.7±15%), which was improved after three months on CPAP treatment, 47.6±7.9 ml/kg/min (92.9±10.5%). (p=0.002). In addition, patients' mean work (W) value increased significantly from baseline to three months of treatment with CPAP (101.5±30 watts vs 78.6±18.5 watts. p=0.015, respectively). There were no significant differences in terms of physical activity, as noted in IPAQ, before and after OSA therapy (p=0.075). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, OSA is associated with impaired exercise capacity, which seems to be improved after short-term treatment with PAP. Further evidence is warranted to elucidate whether CPET could be routinely used to monitor treatment responses of OSA with CPAP.

Health costs from hospitalization with H1N1 infection during the 2009-2010 influenza pandemic compared with non-H1N1 respiratory infections.

BACKGROUND: The first positive patient with influenza A (H1N1) was recorded in March 2009 and the pandemic continued with new outbreaks throughout 2010. This study's objective was to quantify the total cost of inpatient care and identify factors associated with the increased cost of the 2009-2010 influenza A pandemic in comparison with nonviral respiratory infection. METHODS: In total, 133 positive and 103 negative H1N1 patients were included from three tertiary care hospitals during the two waves of H1N1 in 2009 and 2010. The health costs for protective equipment and pharmaceuticals and hospitalization (medications, laboratory, and diagnostic tests) were compared between H1N1 positive and negative patients. RESULTS: The objective of the study was to quantify the means of daily and total costs of inpatient care. Overall, cost was higher for H1N1 positive (€61,0117.72) than for H1N1-negative patients (€464,923.59). This was mainly due to the protection measures used and the prolonged hospitalization in intensive care units. In H1N1-negative patients, main contributors to cost included additional diagnostic tests due to concern regarding respiratory capacity and laboratory values, as well as additional radiologic and microbial culture tests. The mean duration of hospitalization was 841 days for H1N1 positive and 829 days for negative patients. CONCLUSION: Cost was higher in H1N1 patients, mainly due to the protection measures used and the increased duration of hospitalization in intensive care units. An automated system to monitor patients would be desirable to reduce cost in H1N1 influenza.