Procedural Analgesia in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

OBJECTIVE: Neonates perceive pain which also has adverse long-term consequences. Newborns experience several painful procedures a day. Various methods of analgesia may be used but are underutilized. The SMART aim of this project was to increase the use of procedural analgesia from 11.5 to 75% in 6 months by using quality improvement principles. STUDY DESIGN: After a baseline audit, a root cause analysis was done. Based on this, a series of interventions were done as Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. These included posters on analgesia, display of the pain protocol, orders for analgesia, a written test, small power point presentations on the importance of analgesia, and reminders on the trays used for procedures. At the end of each PDSA cycle, an audit was done to determine the proportion of times analgesia was used. Process indicators were also used when possible. Analysis was done by using the Chi-square test and the paired t-test. RESULTS: At baseline 11% of procedures were done after giving analgesia. This significantly improved to 40% at the end of the first PDSA, and 81% after third PDSA. This was sustained at 75% over the next 2 months. CONCLUSION: Procedural analgesia can improve and be sustained by using simple interventions. KEY POINTS: · Procedural pain in neonates can be decreased by the use of analgesia.. · However, most units do not utilize analgesia appropriately.. · This QI showed that simple interventions can optimize use of procedural analgesia..

Efficacy of modified Tochen's formula for optimum endotracheal tube placement in low birth weight neonates: an RCT.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of modified Tochen's formula (birth weight + 5 cm) when compared to Tochen's formula for optimum placement of endotracheal tubes (ET) in low birth weight (LBW) neonates. STUDY DESIGN: In the NICU of a tertiary care hospital, LBW babies requiring intubation were randomized to Tochen's formula or modified Tochen's formula. The incidence of inadequate placement and optimum length of ET insertion were estimated. Analysis was done by the Chi square and 't'-tests. RESULTS: Sixty-seven babies were included: 34 in Tochen's group and 33 in modified Tochen's group. Baseline characteristics were similar. Modified Tochen's formula was significantly (p = 0.006) closer to the optimum position when compared to Tochen's formula. The percentages of optimum and adequate placements of the ET tube was higher in the modified Tochen's group, though not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Modified Tochen's formula in LBW babies may enable more optimum placement of ETs.

Analgesic Efficacy of Oral Dextrose and Breast Milk during Nasopharyngeal Suctioning of Preterm Infants on CPAP: A Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) requires nasopharyngeal suctioning for airway patency, which is painful. Other procedures have used breast milk and 25% dextrose as analgesics. We aimed to compare their analgesic efficacy during nasopharyngeal suctioning in preterm neonates on CPAP. In this blinded randomized controlled trial, babies received 25% dextrose or breast milk orally. Pain before, during and after was assessed using the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) score. Analysis was done for 40 babies. The mean PIPP score in the 25% dextrose group during the procedure was 11.25 ± 2.73 and 13.2 ± 2.55 (p = 0.02) with the intervention and without. In the breast milk group the PIPP score during the procedure was 11.35 ± 3.05 and 13.45 ± 3.27 (p = 0.04); this difference persisted even after the procedure. There was no significant difference between the interventions. Both interventions significantly reduce pain. The analgesic effect of breast milk was sustained.

Comparison of efficacy of three devices of manual positive pressure ventilation: a mannequin-based study.

BACKGROUND: We compared the efficacy of and consistency in manual ventilation by trained healthcare professionals using three devices: self-inflating bag, flow-inflating bag, and T-piece resuscitator. METHODS: Prospective analytical study at a level III Neonatal unit of a tertiary care hospital. Forty participants (consultants, postgraduates, interns, and neonatal nurses - 10 each) manually ventilated a mannequin with the above three devices for three minutes each. This procedure was video recorded. The pressure delivered during the three minutes and the breath rates for the first minute, second minute, and third minute were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the study population and group statistics were used for various parameters of interest. Factorial analysis of variance was conducted to determine the main effects of device and specialty of users. RESULTS: The mean (SD) peak inspiratory pressure of T-piece resuscitator was 16.5 (1.2), self-inflating bag (SIB) was 20.7 (4.4), and flow-inflating bag (AB) was 21.2 (5.0). The mean (SD) positive end expiratory pressure of T-piece resuscitator was 4.7 (0.9) cm of H2O and AB was 1.8 (1.7) cm of H2O. The maximum pressure delivered by T-piece resuscitator was 17.5, AB was 26.2, and SIB was 25.2 cm of H2O. Clinically appropriate breath rates were delivered using all of the devices. More effective breath rates were delivered using T-piece. There was no significant difference among the professional groups. CONCLUSIONS: The T-piece resuscitator provides the most consistent pressures and is most effective. Level of training has no influence on pressures delivered during manual ventilation.

Topical anesthesia or oral dextrose for the relief of pain in screening for retinopathy of prematurity: a randomized controlled double-blinded trial.

OBJECTIVE: Compare efficacy of 0.5% proparacaine eye drops and oral 25% dextrose in reducing pain during screening for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Twenty eligible babies were randomized. Group I received 0.5% proparacaine eye drops at first ROP screening, while Group II received 25% dextrose orally. At second examination, babies received no intervention. Pain was assessed using Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) score. RESULTS: The mean ( ± SD) PIPP during procedure in Group I were 15.5 ± 2.06 and 14 ± 2.4 at first and second screening (p = 0.259). The mean ( ± SD) PIPP in Group II were 14.2 ± 1. 8 and 14.9 ± 2.5 at the first and second screening (p = 0.428). Differences were not statistically significant. The PIPP scores of Group I and Group II at the first screening were also not significantly different (p = 0.165). CONCLUSION: ROP screening causes moderate to severe pain and neither proparacaine nor dextrose is an effective analgesic.