Influence of Hormone Receptor Status on Spinal Metastatic Lesions in Patients with Breast Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Bony metastasis predominantly affects the spinal column and has been commonly associated in patients with breast cancer. There are two types of lesions that can occur with spine cancer-osteolytic or osteoblastic. Some patients may have mixed lesions, which include lytic and blastic in one vertebra or lytic and blastic in different vertebrae. Previous studies have shown that patients with breast cancer have an increased likelihood for development of lytic spinal metastases. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted to more closely examine the association between hormone receptor status and spinal lesion type. A total of 195 patients were initially identified through the City of Hope Cancer Registry. Of the 195, only 153 patients had hormone receptor marker status available. Associations between spinal lesion and hormone receptor status were evaluated using χ(2) tests with alpha = 0.05 significance level. In a secondary analysis, the Oncomine Platform was used, which integrated The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets, to identify osteogenic genes that may be relevant to invasive breast cancers. RESULTS: Contrary to previous studies, our findings revealed progesterone receptor positive (PR+) patients were significantly more likely to present with blastic than lytic or mixed lesions. Furthermore, using TCGA analysis, COL1A1 and COL1A2 were found to be up-regulated, which could provide a molecular explanation for the development of blastic metastases. CONCLUSIONS: By integrating clinical and bioinformatic techniques, this study provides a novel discovery of the relationship between blastic and PR + breast cancers, which may have important implications for diagnostic strategies concerning vertebral metastases.

Current and emerging treatments for brain metastases.

Brain metastasis in patients with cancer can be indicative of multisystem spread or lead to neurological demise if not locally controlled, and is associated with poor survival and high morbidity. Compared with metastasis to other areas of the body, brain metastasis possesses a unique biology that confers high resistance to systemic therapies. This phenomenon has been historically attributed to the inability of chemotherapeutic agents to pass through the blood-brain barrier. Recent studies challenge this premise, revealing other potentially targetable mechanism(s). Therapies that exploit recent advances in the understanding of brain metastasis are still in early stages of development. Encouragingly, and discovered by happenstance, some molecularly targeted drugs already appear to have efficacy against certain tumors and accompanying cerebral edema. In the meantime, conventional treatment modalities such as surgery and radiation have iteratively reached new levels of refinement. However, these achievements are somewhat muted by the emergence of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy, a minimally invasive neuroablative technique. On the horizon, MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery is similarly intriguing. Even in the absence of further advances, local control is frequently achieved with state-of-the-art therapies. Dramatic improvements will likely require sophisticated approaches that account for the particular effects of the microenvironment of the central nervous system on metastasis.

Release in vitro of adipsin, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, angiotensin 1-converting enzyme, and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 by human omental adipose tissue as well as by the nonfat cells and adipocytes.

The relative release in vitro of adipsin, vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM) 1, angiotensin 1-converting enzyme (ACE), and soluble tumor necrosis factor alpha receptor 2 (sTNFR2) by explants of human omental and subcutaneous adipose tissue as well as the nonfat cell fractions and adipocytes from morbidly obese gastric bypass women was compared with that by tissue from obese abdominoplasty patients. Release of VCAM-1 and ACE by omental adipose tissue explants was 220% and 80% greater, respectively, over 48 hours of incubation than that by subcutaneous adipose tissue explants. However, this difference was not seen when release by adipocytes derived from omental fat was compared with that by adipocytes from subcutaneous fat. The release of adipsin and sTNFR2 by omental adipose tissue explants did not differ from that by subcutaneous tissue adipose tissue. The release of adipsin by tissue explants over 48 hours was 100-fold greater than that of VCAM-1, ACE, or sTNFR2. Most of the release of all 4 adipokines was due to the nonfat cells because adipsin release by adipocytes was only 13% of that by the nonfat cells derived from the same amount of adipose tissue, whereas ACE release by adipocytes was 7% and release of VCAM-1 as well as sTNFR2 by adipocytes was 4% or less of that by nonfat cells. The total release in vitro of ACE and sTNFR2, but not that of adipsin or VCAM-1, was enhanced in adipose tissue explants from morbidly obese women as compared with those by explants derived from obese women. We conclude that although human adipose tissue explants release appreciable amounts of adipsin and far smaller amounts of VCAM-1, ACE, and sTNFR2 in vitro, more than 87% of the release is due to the nonfat cells present in adipose tissue. Furthermore, the enhanced release of VCAM-1 and ACE seen in omental adipose tissue explants as compared with explants of subcutaneous adipose tissue is due to release by nonfat cells.