BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine three-dose safety and risk of COVID-19 in patients with myasthenia gravis during the alpha, delta, and omicron waves.

COVID-19 affects the respiratory parenchyma and may potentially contribute to the tendency of myasthenia gravis (MG) patients to develop respiratory failure. It is, therefore, important to study the safety of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 and to assess the risk of COVID-19 in MG patients. The safety of the three-dose BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine and outcomes of COVID-19 during the alpha, delta, and omicron waves were studied in MG patients as well as the rate of exacerbations and safety for a period of up to 6 weeks from each vaccine dose and patient morbidity and mortality during COVID-19 compared to the general population. 430 vaccine doses were administered across 150 patients. Thirteen patients (8.7%) complained of exacerbation within 6 weeks of each vaccine dose. Both MG onset rate and exacerbation rate were similar to previous years. MG exacerbation rate among fifteen patients who had COVID-19 was significantly higher (40%) compared to the rate following vaccination. During the alpha and delta waves, COVID-19 mortality and severe disease were significantly higher (26.7%) compared to the general population (0.96%). All of them were unvaccinated and had generalized MG. During the omicron wave, all the MG patients who contracted COVID-19 were vaccinated and had mild disease. We concluded that COVID-19 is hazardous for generalized MG patients, while the vaccination did not raise the risk for either exacerbation or new onset of MG and was associated with a reduced risk for severe COVID-19. Hence, it is recommended for generalized MG patients to get vaccinated.

Single versus bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in patients with low ejection fraction.

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the standard of care for the treatment of complex coronary artery disease. However, the optimal surgical treatment for patients with reduced left ventricular function with low ejection fraction (EF) is inconclusive. In our center, left-sided coronary grafting with bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) is generally the preferred method for surgical revascularization, also for patients with low EF. We compared early and long-term outcomes between BITA grafting and single internal thoracic artery (SITA) grafting in patients with low EF.We evaluated short- and long-term outcomes of all patients who underwent surgical revascularization in our center during 1996 to 2011, according to EF ≥30% and <30%. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. In addition, patients who underwent BITA and SITA grafting were matched using propensity score matching.In total, 5337 patients with multivessel disease underwent surgical revascularization during the study period. Of them, 394 had low EF. Among these, 188 underwent SITA revascularization and 206 BITA grafting. Those who underwent SITA were more likely to have comorbidities such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, congestive heart failure, chronic renal failure, and a critical preoperative condition including preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump insertion.Statistically significant differences were not observed between the SITA and BITA groups in 30-day mortality (8.5% vs 6.8%, P = .55), sternal wound infection (2.7% vs 1.0%, P = .27), stroke (3.7% vs 6.3%, P = .24), and perioperative myocardial infarction (5.9% vs 2.9%, P = .15). Long-term survival (median follow up of 14 years, interquartile range, 11.2-18.9) was also similar between the groups. Propensity score matching (129 matched pairs) yielded similar early and long-term outcomes for the groups.This study did not demonstrate any clinical benefit for BITA compared with SITA revascularization in individuals with low EF.

Does bilateral versus single thoracic artery grafting provide survival benefit in female patients?

OBJECTIVES: Bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting is associated with improved survival, but this technique is reluctantly used in women due to an increased risk of sternal wound infection. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term survival of women who underwent BITA grafting and single internal thoracic artery (SITA) grafting. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 556 consecutive female BITA patients and 685 female SITA patients. RESULTS: SITA patients were older and more likely to have comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, chronic lung disease, chronic renal failure, peripheral vascular disease and cerebral vascular disease). Operative mortality showed a trend towards a benefit for BITA (2.9% vs 5.0% for SITA, P = 0.06). The sternal wound infection rates were similar (3.4% vs 2.9%, P = 0.6); however, the occurrence of stroke was significantly lower in the SITA group (3.4% vs 1.2%, P = 0.007). The median survival of the BITA group was significantly better {13.8 years [95% confidence interval (CI) 12.8-14.9] vs 10.3 years [95% CI 9.6-11.1], P = 0.001}. After propensity score matching (491 pairs), the assignment to BITA was not associated with increased early mortality or complication rates, and the choice of BITA grafting was associated with better survival [14.5 years (95% CI 13.3-15.6) vs 11.8 years (95% CI 10.7-12.9)]. Only the choice of conduits was associated with increased late mortality (multivariable analysis, hazard ratio 1.28, 95% CI 1.024-1.591; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The low early mortality and complication rate, and the long-term survival benefit of BITA compared to SITA grafting, support the use of BITA grafting in women.

Are two internal thoracic grafts better than one in patients with peripheral vascular disease?

BACKGROUND: The use of two bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting (BITA) was shown to lead to survival benefit. However, operators are reluctant to use BITA with peripheral vascular disease (PVD) because of concerns of increased rates of sternal wound infection and lack of studies supporting survival benefit compared with single internal thoracic artery (SITA) grafting. The aim of this study is to compare outcome BITA grafting versus of SITA and vein grafts in PVD patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six hundred and twenty-one PVD patients who underwent BITA between 1996 and 2011 were compared with 372 patients who underwent SITA. RESULTS: SITA patients were older and more likely more likely to have comorbidities (female, insulin-dependent diabetes, chronic obstructive lung disease, congestive heart failure, previous coronary artery bypass grafting, renal insufficiency, cerebrovascular disease, and emergency operation). Operative mortality (5.1 vs. 4.5%, in the SITA and BITA, respectively, P=0.758), rate of sternal wound infection (5.1 vs. 3.9%, P=0.421), and strokes (4.8 vs. 7.4%, P=0.141) were not significantly different between groups. BITA patients did not have significantly better 10-year survival (52.6 vs. 45.9%, P=0.087) and after propensity score matching (302 well-matched pairs), BITA was not associated with improved survival (hazard ratio: 0.902; 95% confidence interval: 0.742-1.283; P=0.784) (Cox model). CONCLUSION: The routine use of BITA versus SITA in PVD patients does not improve long-term survival. Selective use of BITA in lower risk patients might unmask the benefits of BITA.

Correction: Are two internal thoracic grafts better than one in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease? Analysis of 387 cases between 1996-2011.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201227.].

Are two internal thoracic grafts better than one in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease? Analysis of 387 cases between 1996-2011.

OBJECTIVES: Bilateral internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafting is associated with improved survival. However, potential survival benefit of using two ITA`s in patients with chronic lung disease (CLD) is questionable due to their increased risk of sternal wound infection (SWI) compared to operations incorporating single ITA (SITA). The purpose of this study is to compare early and long-term outcome of bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting to that of grafting with single internal thoracic grafts and vein grafts or radial artery (SITA) in CLD patients with multi-vessels coronary disease. METHODS: One hundred and forty eight CLD patients who underwent BITA between 1996 and 2011 were compared with 239 who underwent SITA at the same period. RESULTS: SITA patients were more often female, more likely to have insulin treated diabetes (DM), DM with end organ damage, neurologic dysfunction and unstable angina. Despite of the difference in preoperative characteristics, early mortality (5.4% vs. 5.4%, in the SITA and BITA respectively, p = 0 < .999) and occurrences of SWI (6.3% vs 9.5%, p = 0.320) and strokes (3.8% vs 5.4%,p = 0.611) were not significantly different between groups. BITA patients did not have better Kaplan-Meier 10 year survival (52.8% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.088) and after matching, BITA and SITA had similar adjusted survival (HR 0.983[95%CI 0.755-1.280] p = 0.901) (cox model). CONCLUSION: Our study results suggest that in patients with CLD, the choice of BITA grafting technique did not provide survival benefit compared to SITA with other conduits.

Should Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting Be Used in Patients After Recent Myocardial Infarction?

BACKGROUND: Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting (BITA) is associated with improved survival. However, surgeons do not commonly use BITA in patients after myocardial infarction (MI) because survival is good with single internal thoracic artery grafting (SITA). We aimed to compare the outcomes of BITA with those of SITA and other approaches in patients with multivessel disease after recent MI. METHODS AND RESULTS: In total, 938 patients with recent MI (<3 months) who underwent BITA between 1996 and 2011 were compared with 682 who underwent SITA. SITA patients were older and more likely to have comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic renal failure, peripheral vascular disease), to be female, and to have had a previous MI. Acute MI and 3-vessel disease were more prevalent in the BITA group. Operative mortality of BITA patients was lower (3.0% versus 5.8%, P=0.01), and sternal infections and strokes were similar. Median follow-up was 15.21 years (range: 0-21.25 years). Survival of BITA patients was better (70.3% versus 52.5%, P<0.001). Propensity score matching was used to account for differences in preoperative characteristics between groups. Overall, 551 matched pairs had similar preoperative characteristics. BITA was a predictor of better survival in the matched groups (hazard ratio: 0.679; P=0.002; Cox model). Adjusted survival of emergency BITA and SITA patients was similar (hazard ratio: 0.883; P=0.447); however, in the nonemergency group, BITA was a predictor of better survival (hazard ratio: 0.790; P=0.009; Cox model). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that survival is better with BITA compared with SITA in nonemergency cases after recent MI, with proper patient selection.

Comparison of radial and bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in patients with peripheral vascular disease†.

OBJECTIVES: The composite T-graft with radial artery (RA) attached end-to-side to the left internal thoracic artery (ITA) provides arterial myocardial revascularization without the increased risk of deep sternal wound infection associated with harvesting 2 ITAs. However, many surgeons are reluctant to use RA in patients with peripheral vascular disease (PVD) due to concerns regarding the quality of the conduit in this subset of patients. The purpose of this study is to compare early- and long-term outcomes of arterial grafting with bilateral ITAs (BITA) to that of single ITA and RA in patients with PVD. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2010, 619 consecutive patients with PVD (500 BITAs and 119 single ITA and RA) underwent myocardial revascularization in our institution. RESULTS: Occurrence of following risk factors as female sex, age 70+, diabetes, unstable angina, emergency operation, cerebrovascular disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was higher in the RA-ITA group. The RA-ITA group also had a higher logistic EuroSCORE (22.1 vs 13.3). Operative mortality and occurrence of deep sternal wound infection of the two groups was similar (4.2% vs 5.0% and 2.5% vs 4.0% for the radial and bilateral ITA, respectively). Median follow-up was 9.75 years. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier 10-year survival of the two groups was similar (44.1% vs 49.6%, P = 0.7). After propensity score matching (100 pairs), assignment to BITA was not associated with better adjusted survival (hazard ratio 0.593, 95% confidence interval 0.265-1.327, P = 0.20, Cox model). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PVD, complete arterial revascularization with left ITA and RA can be justified with regards to survival.

One or Two Internal Thoracic Grafts? Long-Term Follow-Up of 957 Off-Pump Coronary Bypass Surgeries.

BACKGROUND: The potential survival benefit of bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OPCABG) is controversial owing to the technical complexity of these operations. Our objective was to compare the outcome of patients undergoing OPCABG with BITA to the outcome of patients undergoing OPCABG with a single internal thoracic artery (SITA) and saphenous vein grafts or radial artery. METHODS: Five hundred and thirty-five consecutive patients who underwent OPCABG BITA at our institute between 2000 and 2008 were compared with 422 patients who underwent OPCABG with SITA. Propensity score matching was used to account for differences between groups in preoperative characteristics. RESULTS: Being female (20.9% versus 36.0%, p < 0.001), having diabetes mellitus (36.6% versus 55.7%, p > 0.001), recent myocardial infarction (23.6% versus 33.2%, p > 0.001), aged 70 years or more (41.1% versus 49.8%, p = 0.001), peripheral vascular disease (26.1% versus 46.7%, p > 0.001), and chronic renal failure (7.9% versus 15.9%, p > 0.001) were less frequent in the BITA group than in the SITA group, respectively. The European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score was significantly higher for the SITA group (7.62, versus 5.46 for BITA group, p = 0.001), whereas operative mortality (1.7% BITA versus 2.6% SITA) and sternal wound infections (1.7% BITA versus 2.1% SITA) were similar. The mean follow-up was 11.6 ± 3.5 years. The BITA patients' 10-year survival (Kaplan-Meier) was better (72.2% versus 55.1% for SITA, p > 0.001). However, after propensity matching, survival for BITA and SITA were similar. CONCLUSIONS: This large cohort study suggests that long-term outcomes for patients undergoing OPCABG are not better with BITA grafting.

Impact of left ventricular filling parameters on outcome of patients undergoing trans-catheter aortic valve replacement.

AIM: To assess the impact of left ventricular (LV) filling parameters on outcomes following trans-catheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 526 TAVR patients were compared with 300 patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) treated conservatively. Clinical variables were collected along with echocardiographic data at baseline, 1 month, and 6 months after study entry. End points included all-cause mortality and the combination of death and heart failure admission. LV filling parameters associated with mortality included reduced A wave velocity (P = 0.005) and shorter deceleration time (DT) (P = 0.0005). DT was superior to all other parameters (P = 0.05) apart from patients with atrial fibrillation in whom E/e' was better. Short DT (<160 ms) was associated with lower survival than long DT (≥220 ms; P = 0.002) or intermediate DT (P = 0.05), even after adjustment for age, gender, stroke volume index (SVI), and co-morbidities. However, patients with short baseline DT exhibited greater improvement in DT, E/A, and systolic pulmonary pressure at follow-up than patients with baseline DT ≥160 ms (P < 0.05 for all time x group interactions). Most importantly, among patients with short DT, TAVR was associated with better survival than conservative treatment (46 ± 7 vs. 28 ± 12% at 3 years, P = 0.05), even after adjustment for age, gender, and SVI (P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Short DT is an independent predictor of adverse outcome following TAVR. Nevertheless, LV filling parameters improve in most patients post TAVR, and TAVR is associated with improved survival compared with conservative therapy, even in patients with evidence of elevated LV filling. Thus, evidence of elevated LV filling should not be viewed as a contraindication for TAVR.

Long-term outcome of revascularization with composite T-grafts: Is bilateral mammary grafting better than single mammary and radial artery grafting?

OBJECTIVE: Bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) grafting is associated with improved survival. However, many surgeons are reluctant to use this technique, owing to the potentially increased risk of sternal infection. The composite T-graft with radial artery (RA) attached end-to-side to the left internal mammary artery (IMA) provides complete arterial revascularization without increased risk of sternal infection. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of these 2 strategies. METHODS: Patients who underwent BIMA grafting using the composite T-graft technique, between 1996 and 2010 (n = 1329), were compared with 389 patients who underwent composite grafting with a single IMA + RA during the same time period. RESULTS: Patients undergoing single IMA grafting were older, more often women, and more likely to have diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and COPD, and to need an emergency operation. Congestive heart failure, left main disease, and recent myocardial infarction were more prevalent with bilateral grafting. Propensity-score matching was used to account for differences between groups in preoperative patient characteristics. The 268 matched pairs had similar characteristics. The median follow-up time was 14.19 (95% confidence interval 13.43-14.95) years. Operative mortality and Kaplan-Meier 10-year survival of the 2 matched groups were similar (3.4% vs 3.7%, and 61.6% vs 64%, for the groups treated with BIMA and single IMA, respectively). Cox-adjusted survival was similar (P = .514). Age, chronic renal failure, and performance of <3 bypass grafts were independent predictors of decreased survival. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that long-term outcomes of arterial revascularization with a composite T-graft constructed using left IMA and RA are not inferior to outcomes after BIMA grafting.

Determinants of Effort Intolerance in Patients With Heart Failure: Combined Echocardiography and Cardiopulmonary Stress Protocol.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess individual mechanisms of effort intolerance in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), or normal cardiac function using combined echocardiography and cardiopulmonary stress testing. BACKGROUND: Combined stress echocardiography and cardiopulmonary tests visualize cardiac chambers in 4 well-defined activity levels (rest, unloaded, anaerobic threshold, and peak), allowing noninvasive assessment of cardiac function, hemodynamics, and arterial venous oxygen content difference (AVo(2)Diff) during all stages. METHODS: Left ventricular volumes, stroke volume (SV), S', E/e', oxygen consumption (Vo(2)), and AVo(2)Diff were measured in all effort stages using ramp semirecumbent cycle prolonged (≥8 min) exercise in 45 consecutive subjects evaluated for effort intolerance (14 normal cardiac function, 16 HFpEF, and 15 HFrEF patients; age 56.5 ± 16 years; 73% male). RESULTS: In HFpEF and HFrEF, the changes in Vo2 were attenuated (between group p = 0.003; group by time interaction p < 0.0001), as well as peak heart rate (p = 0.0001; p = 0.0001) and SV (p = 0.006; p = 0.0001). End-diastolic volume to E/e' ratio (measure of compliance) was superior in HFrEF and normal patients at baseline but worsened in HFpEF and HFrEF at peak exercise (8.3 ± 4 vs. 11.6 ± 5 vs. 19.1 ± 8; p = 0.004; p = 0.01). Functional mitral regurgitation worsened even during the unloaded stage, mostly in patients with HFrEF, but also in several patients with HFpEF. In multivariable analysis, heart rate response (p = 0.007), and AVo(2)Diff (p < 0.0001) were the most significant independent predictors of effort capacity; SV was not. CONCLUSIONS: Combined tests are feasible and allow noninvasive evaluation of effort intolerance. In HFpEF and HFrEF patients, exercise intolerance is predominantly due to chronotropic incompetence and peripheral factors. Combined stress echocardiography and cardiopulmonary tests may have potential for clinical management and selection of patients for trials.

Added value of pulmonary venous flow Doppler assessment in patients with preserved ejection fraction and its contribution to the diastolic grading paradigm.

AIMS: To evaluate the prognostic role of pulmonary venous flow parameters and their role in patients with preserved ejection fraction (EF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Pulmonary venous flow parameters were measured in 365 patients in sinus rhythm, without significant mitral disease, and EF >50% (age 64.9 ± 19; 52% female) by a single sonographer. Survival, time to re-admission for heart failure, and to a combined cardiac end point (cardiac death, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation) were retrospectively analysed and correlated to echo parameters. Systolic (S) and diastolic (D) pulmonary vein flow were obtainable in 73% of patients and Ar in 65%. The lower peak S/D ratio and higher ΔAr-A time were associated with higher rate of heart failure readmission (P = 0.03 for both). The S/D integral ratio was the best pulmonary vein flow predictor of heart failure readmissions (P = 0.0009), better than the peak S/D ratio, or ΔA-Ar time (P < 0.01 for both), and independently predicted worse outcome even when adjusted for diastolic grading (using recent guidelines), left ventricle mass index, E/e', and left atrial volume index (P < 0.05 for all). The addition S/D ratio to diastolic grading recognized patients with pseudo-normal filling pattern and S/D ratio >1 with similar clinical outcomes to grade I (P > 0.5), but worse clinical outcomes than in the pseudo-normal patients with lower S/D ratio (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: PVFP are obtainable in most patients, add prognostic information on top of routine diastolic parameters, and define an early stage of diastolic dysfunction resembling the pseudo-normal pattern in which S/D ratio is >1, and outcome is excellent.

Thoracoscopic epicardial lead implantation as an alternative to failed endovascular insertion for cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Numerous anomalies or postprocedural stricture of the venous system prevent optimal endovascular implantation of a pacing lead in more than 10% of patient indicated for permanent pacing or cardiac resynchronization therapy. The purpose of this report was to summarize our experience and immediate postoperative results of thoracoscopic lead implantation as a lesser invasive solution to an unsuccessful endovascular lead insertion. METHODS: From January 2008 to April 2013, 11 epicardial leads were introduced thoracoscopically at our center as a rescue treatment after failed endovascular attempts. Patients were ventilated using a double-lumen endotracheal tube. A 5-mm 30-degree lance thoracoscope was used with either 2 or 3 additional working ports. A screw-in pacing lead (Medtronic Model 5071 Pacing lead, Minneapolis, MN USA) was inserted into the left ventricular epicardium. After the lead placement and assessment for threshold less than 1 V, the lead was brought to the chest wall and tunneled to the pacemaker generator pocket. At the end of the procedure, a small, flexible 14F thoracic drain, was left inside the pleural cavity for the next 24 hours. RESULTS: There were no mortality or any major surgical complications among these patients. All patients responded to the epicardial lead implantation in terms of appropriate pacing and conductivity. No clinical failure was observed, and no patient required a repeat procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic lead insertion is safe and easy to perform. We believe it should be offered as the first choice after failed endovascular pacing lead implantation.

Long-term clinical and echocardiographic follow-up of the freestyle stentless aortic bioprosthesis: the Tel Aviv Medical Center experience.

BACKGROUND: Stentless aortic bioprostheses were designed to provide improved hemodynamic performance and potentially better survival. OBJECTIVES: To report the outcomes of patients after aortic valve replacement with the Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis at the Tel Aviv Medical Center followed for < or = 15 years. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 1997 and 2011, 268 patients underwent primary aortic valve replacement with a Freestyle bioprosthesis, 211 (79%) of them in the sub-coronary position. Mean age, Charlson comorbidity index and Euro-score were 71.0 +/- 9.2 years, 4.2 +/- 1.5 and 10.2 +/- 11 respectively, and 156 (58%) were male. Peak and mean trans-aortic gradient decreased significantly (75.0 +/- 29.1 vs. 22.8 +/- 9.6 mmHg, P < 0.0001; and 43.4 +/- 17.2 vs. 12.1 +/- 5.4 mmHg, P < 0.0001 respectively) during 3 months of follow-up. Mean overall follow-up was 4.9 +/- 3.1 years and was complete in all patients. In-hospital mortality was 4.1% (n=11) but differed significantly between the first 100 patients operated before 2006 and the last 168 patients operated after January 2006 (8 vs. 3 patients, 8.0% vs. 1.8%, P = 0.01). Overall, 5 and 10 year survival rates were 85 +/- 2.5% and 57.2 +/- 5.7%, respectively. Five year survival was markedly improved in patients operated after January 2006 compared to those operated in the early years of the experience (92.3 +/- 2.3% vs. 76.0 +/- 4.4%, P = 0.0009). All the 21 octogenarians operated after January 2006 survived surgery, with excellent 5 year survival (85.1 +/- 7.9%). Six patients required reoperation during follow-up: structural valve deterioration in five and endocarditis in one. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve replacement with the Freestyle bioprosthesis provides good long-term hemodynamic and clinical outcomes, even in octogenarians. Valve calcification is the major (and rare) mode of valve deterioration leading to reoperation in these patients.

Video-assisted thymectomy with contralateral surveillance camera: a means to minimize the risk of contralateral phrenic nerve injury.

OBJECTIVE: Thymectomy for thymoma has traditionally been performed through midsternotomy that provides excellent exposure for a complete and safe resection. Minimally invasive alternatives have not been extensively evaluated for this disease process because data regarding the long-term oncologic effectiveness of these techniques remain to be established. Furthermore, video-assisted surgery as a unilateral approach may compromise the extension of the resection and could cause irreversible damage to the phrenic nerve of the opposite side. We evaluated the clinical feasibility and safety of a bilateral concomitant video-assisted approach with contralateral surveillance camera in patients undergoing thymectomy for thymoma. METHODS: Four patients (3 females, 1 male) with thymoma causing myasthenia gravis (MG) were operated thoracoscopically at our institute under general anesthesia with double-lumen endotracheal intubation. The patients were placed in a supine position, and a 5-mm 30-degree lens thoracoscope was introduced into the left pleural space. Two other 10-mm working channels were applied. En bloc thymectomy was then performed, including mediastinal and pericardial fat pads, other tissue, and pleura from the level of the thoracic inlet to the diaphragm. A second 5-mm thoracoscope was inserted into the right hemithorax, and it was kept inside during the entire procedure to allow lateral surveillance of the extension and safety of the resection. Carbon dioxide insufflation and valved ports were used. RESULTS: The duration of the operation was 90 ± 72 minutes. Complete resection was achieved in all patients without any nerve injury. There were no perioperative adverse events. Gradual remission from extremity and ocular weakness was achieved after recovery. CONCLUSIONS: The ultimate surgical goal of thymectomy is to completely remove the gland and anterior mediastinal tissue without nerve injury. Bilateral concomitant video-assisted thoracic thymectomy with a contralateral surveillance camera was found feasible and safe. Given the capability of our technique to perform a complete and extensive thymectomy associated with less invasiveness and beneficial effects, there seems to be a role for minimally invasive thymectomy in the treatment of thymoma.

Ultrasound-guided, video-assisted transdiaphragmatic radiofrequency ablation for primary liver malignancy or metastatic nodules.

OBJECTIVE: : Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is among the best options in the treatment of primary liver malignancy and metastases because it is a highly effective and minimally invasive alternative to resection in small, nonresectable tumors or in poor surgical candidates and is associated with low morbidity and mortality. We evaluated the clinical feasibility and safety of thoracoscopic, ultrasound (US)-guided RFA of subdiaphragmatic liver malignancies in advanced cirrhotic patients awaiting transplantation. METHODS: : Two patients (one female and one male) with end-stage cirrhosis who developed hepatocellular carcinoma were treated thoracoscopically by US-guided RFA. An endoscopic US probe was inserted into the right pleural space through a 10-mm working channel. An RF-operating needle applicator was inserted through a second 10-mm working port after identification of the lesion, penetrating the diaphragm toward the lesion. The procedure duration, applied energy, and generator output were recorded during the intervention. The treatment result and procedure-related complications were analyzed. RESULTS: : The procedure duration was 74 and 92 minutes, respectively. A mean energy deposition of 353 joules resulted in a mean coagulation volume of 115 cm. Tumor ablation was achieved as determined by the postinterventional lack of contrast enhancement in the target region at the follow-up computed tomographic scans performed after 4 months. CONCLUSIONS: : RFA offers definite possibilities in the management of small-sized tumors. Thoracoscopic, US-guided transdiaphragmatic RFA has proven to be clinically feasible and safe and can be an effective modality for treating subdiaphragmatic liver lesions. Its minimally invasive nature is the most important advantage compared with surgical resection, especially for patients with high operative risk.

Low-dose ketamine via intravenous patient-controlled analgesia device after various transthoracic procedures improves analgesia and patient and family satisfaction.

Ketamine was recently shown to attenuate postoperative pain when used in combination with morphine in patients who had undergone general and orthopedic surgery. We assessed its effects in 46 patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass, off-pump coronary artery bypass, or thoracotomy and correlated them with patient and family satisfaction. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was available for 72 hours. One group received 2mg/bolus morphine randomly and double-blindly (group MO), and another group received 1mg morphine plus 5mg ketamine/bolus (group MK), both using IV-PCA. The patients' pain and satisfaction rates were assessed three times daily during hospitalization using a visual analog scale. Their families' satisfaction was assessed as well. Although the 3-day mean amount of morphine used by the MK patients was approximately 60% of that used by the MO patients, their levels of pain and satisfaction were better than those of the MO group. There was an inverted and statistically significant correlation between the patients' level of satisfaction on the second postoperative day (POD) and the satisfaction of their families on POD 2, 3, and 7 and the POD 3 patients' pain assessment in the MK group but not in the MO group. There were no differences in hemodynamic, respiratory, side effects, or complication rates between the groups. The conclusion is that the effects of adding a small ketamine dose to half of the standard morphine dose via IV-PCA after thoracotomy was superior to the standard morphine dose in terms of the patients' self-reported pain score and satisfaction, as well as the family satisfaction rate.

Impact of clopidogrel use on mortality and major bleeding in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.

Patients who received clopidogrel prior to coronary bypass surgery are at increased risk for bleeding that must be balanced with risk of ongoing ischemia if coronary artery bypass grafting is delayed. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of clopidogrel on mortality and major bleeding in patients undergoing urgent coronary bypass surgery. We reviewed 451 consecutive patients who underwent urgent isolated coronary bypass surgery; 262 had not received clopidogrel, whereas 189 received clopidogrel < or = 5 days preoperative. The primary endpoint was in-hospital death, massive transfusion or massive blood loss. Patient characteristics were almost similar between groups. There was no difference in in-hospital death or massive bleeding indices between groups (clopidogrel: 7% vs. no clopidogrel: 6%, P = 0.9). No difference was observed even after adjusting for the date of stopping clopidogrel preoperatively. Multivariate regression analysis showed that clopidogrel or the duration it was stopped preoperatively, did not predict adverse outcomes. Significant independent predictors included preoperative renal dysfunction, hemoglobin level and peripheral vascular disease. clopidogrel, or the time it was stopped prior to surgery, was not a risk factor for in-hospital death, massive bleeding, or other poor early outcomes in patients undergoing urgent coronary artery bypass surgery.

Ketamine spares morphine consumption after transthoracic lung and heart surgery without adverse hemodynamic effects.

BACKGROUND: Thoracotomy is associated with severe pain. Large doses of morphine can depress respiratory drive and compromise hemodynamic stability. Ketamine reduces hyperalgesia, prevents opioid tolerance and resistance and lowers morphine consumption. At sub-anesthetic (< or = 500 microg/kg) doses, ketamine rarely produces undesirable hemodynamic alterations. We hypothesized that by combining a sub-anesthetic dose of ketamine with morphine, we could effectively control pain with less morphine and minimize drowsiness, while maintaining safe hemodynamic and respiratory parameters. METHODS: Sequential patients undergoing anterolateral thoracotomy for MIDCAB, lung tumor resection, or median sternotomy for OPCAB were randomized to one of the two intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) protocols. MO-only patients received 1.5 mg MO bolus, and MK patients received 1.0 mg MO+5 mg ketamine/bolus, both with a 7 min lockout time. IV-PCA was initiated when the patient was sufficiently awake (> or = 5/10 VAS) and rated pain > or = 5/10 on a 0-10 VAS. Rescue intramuscular diclofenac 75 mg was available. Follow-up of respiratory, hemodynamic and pain statuses lasted 72 h. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients completed the 6-month study. Heart rate and blood pressures were identically stable in both groups. Respiratory rate and pulse oximetry were higher (P < 0.05) in the MK than in the MO group. MO patients (n = 28) used twice (2.0 +/-2.3 mg/patient/h) the amount of morphine compared to MK patients (n = 30, 1.0 +/- 1.4 mg/patient/h, P < 0.05). Thirty-six hours after starting PCA, 10 MO patients still required IV-PCA compared to 5 MK patients (P < 0.05). Diclofenac was used 70% more in MO than in MK patients. MO patients suffered more postoperative nausea and vomiting. No patients had hallucinations. CONCLUSIONS: The concomitant use of sub-anesthetic ketamine plus two-thirds the standard MO dose following thoracotomy, MIDCAB or OPCAB resulted in lower pain scores, reduced MO consumption and shorter postoperative IV-PCA dependence. These advantages were associated with cardiovascular stability and even better respiratory parameters.