Molecular biology of the androgen receptor: from molecular understanding to the clinic.

The androgen receptor (AR) is the key regulatory element of androgen signaling in the cell. It mediates action of androgens and is therefore essential for growth, function and differentiation of the human male urogenital tract. Genetic alterations in the AR gene may cause impaired development resulting in androgen insensitivity syndromes (AIS) or in neurodegenerative diseases like Kennedy syndrome. Besides the crucial role in the process of virilization during embryogenesis and puberty, the AR also plays an important role in the adult man as the intracellular mediator of androgen action. Androgen withdrawal and/or AR blockade is the main choice of treatment of nonorgan-confined prostate cancer. Unfortunately, this treatment is only palliative and a majority of these tumors recur and progress to an androgen-independent and therapy-resistant stage. Recent findings gave new insight into the molecular structure and function of the AR and improved our understanding about prostate cancer progression, consequently resulting in the development of novel treatments. It has become evident that the AR is a nuclear transcription factor that can be activated ligand-dependently by androgens as well as ligand-independently by other hormones and various growth factors, respectively. Moreover, it was shown that the interaction of the AR with other proteins of the intracellular signal transduction cascade may promote prostate tumor growth. This review will summarize the most important findings about the AR and the androgen signaling pathway to improve the understanding of prostate diseases and novel treatment strategies that may be useful in the clinic.

Expression of androgen receptor coregulatory proteins in prostate cancer and stromal-cell culture models.

BACKGROUND: Androgen receptor (AR) transcriptional activity is modulated by cofactor proteins. They act as costimulators, corepressors, or bridging proteins, and a disbalanced expression may contribute to the altered activity of the AR in advanced prostate cancer. We investigated the expression of a series of steroid receptor cofactors in prostate cancer cell lines, including several LNCaP sublines, and in prostate stromal cells. METHODS: Expression of cofactors was analyzed by means of RT-PCR in PC-3, Du-145, LNCaP, three sublines of LNCaP established after long-term androgen deprivation, and two strains of primary prostate stroma cells. Expression in LNCaP and LNCaP-abl cells (which represented an advanced tumor cell) was analyzed employing semiquantitative RT-PCR. RESULTS: Ten of the 12 cofactors tested were expressed in all cells analyzed (AIB1, ARA54, ARA70, CBP, cyclin D1, Her2/neu/erbB2, BAG-1/M/L, SRC-1, SMRT, and TIF2). Only ARA55 and FHL2 mRNAs were not detected in all cells. ARA55 mRNA was absent in LNCaP cells, LNCaP sublines, and DU-145 cells; FHL2 was not expressed in LNCaP cells and its derivatives. The expression pattern was identical in LNCaP cells, and the long-term androgen ablated LNCaP sublines. Moreover, comparison of expression levels in LNCaP and LNCaP-abl cells revealed a slight reduction in LNCaP-abl cells but no gross differences. CONCLUSIONS: Prostatic cells express a great number of steroid receptor cofactors. AR activity thus seems to be modulated in a very complex way in prostate cells.

Inhibition of LncaP prostate cancer cells by means of androgen receptor antisense oligonucleotides.

Currently available methods for treatment of human prostatic carcinoma aim to inactivate the androgen receptor (AR) by androgen deprivation or blockade with anti-androgens. Failure of endocrine therapy and tumor progression is characterized by androgen-independent growth despite high levels of AR expression in metastatic disease. We inhibited AR expression in LNCaP prostate tumor cells by using antisense AR oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) and explored whether antisense AR treatment would be conceivable as a therapy for advanced prostate cancer. Among the various AR antisense ODNs tested, a 15-base ODN targeting the CAG repeats encoding the poly-glutamine region of the AR (as750/15) was found to be most effective. Treatment of LNCaP cells with as750/15 reduced AR expression to approximately 2% within 24 hours compared with mock-treated controls. AR down-regulation resulted in significant cell growth inhibition, strongly reduced secretion of the androgen-regulated prostate-specific antigen, reduction of epidermal growth factor receptor expression, and an increase in apoptotic cells. Mis-sense and mismatched control ODNs had no or only slight effects. Antisense inhibition was also very efficient in LNCaP-abl cells, a subline established after long-term androgen ablation of LNCaP cells, resulting in inhibition of AR expression and cell proliferation that was similar to that seen for parental LNCaP cells. This study shows that inhibition of AR expression by antisense AR ODNs may be a promising new approach for treatment of advanced human prostate cancer.

Peptide YY-2 (PYY2) and pancreatic polypeptide-2 (PPY2): species-specific evolution of novel members of the neuropeptide Y gene family.

Several gene duplication events have led to the creation of at least five distinct members of the neuropeptide Y gene family. We now reveal that the most recent of these events, involving the PYY-PPY gene cluster on chromosome 17q21.1, has led to the creation of novel PYY- and PP-like genes on chromosome 17q11 in the human genome. Sequence analysis of the novel human PYY2 and PPY2 genes shows an extensive homology to the peptide YY-pancreatic polypeptide genes, at the level of gene structure, nucleotide sequence, and primary amino acid sequence. The extremely high degree of homology between the PYY-PPY and the PYY2-PPY2 gene clusters, in both coding regions and especially noncoding regions, suggests that the PYY2 and PPY2 genes have arisen by a very recent gene duplication. Similar gene duplication events of the PYY-PPY gene cluster have also occurred in other species, including cow and baboon, but have not been confirmed in the rat and mouse genomes. Interestingly, despite the greater than 92% nucleotide sequence identity between these new genes, a few specific mutations have resulted in significantly altered peptide sequences. These altered sequences are accompanied by acquisition of new functions apparently unrelated to the neurotransmitter/endocrine role of PYY and PPY, as demonstrated by the major involvement of bovine PYY2, also known as seminal plasmin, in the fertilization process.

Androgen receptor protein is down-regulated by basic fibroblast growth factor in prostate cancer cells.

Interactions between polypeptide growth factors and the androgen receptor (AR) are important for regulation of cellular events in carcinoma of the prostate. Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), the prototype of heparin-binding growth factors, and the AR are commonly expressed in prostate cancer. bFGF diminished prostate-specific antigen protein in the supernatants of androgen-stimulated human prostate cancer cells LNCaP by 80%. In the present study, we asked whether the bFGF effect on prostate-specific antigen is preceded by action on AR expression. LNCaP cells were treated with bFGF and AR protein expression was determined by immunoblotting and ligand binding assay. bFGF down-regulated AR protein in a dose-dependent manner showing a maximal effect at 50 ng ml(-1) both in the presence or absence of dihydrotestosterone. Down-regulation of AR protein expression occurred already after 8 h of bFGF treatment and a maximal inhibition was observed 24 h after addition of bFGF to culture media. As AR expression can be reduced by an increase in intracellular calcium levels, we investigated whether the bFGF effect on AR protein is mediated by this mechanism. Calcium release from intracellular stores and store-operated calcium influx after treatment with either bFGF or calcium ionophore A 23187 were measured by single cell fluorescence technique. The ionophore A 23187 was able to induce calcium influx and an increase in cytoplasmic calcium concentration in LNCaP cells. In contrast, bFGF was incapable of eliciting a similar effect. In contrast to AR protein, AR mRNA levels were not affected by bFGF as shown by semiquantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. In summary, these studies show that bFGF is a potent negative regulator of AR protein expression in the human prostate cancer cell line LNCaP.

Mechanism of androgen receptor activation and possible implications for chemoprevention trials.

Androgens are pivotal regulators of prostate cell growth, differentiation and function, and their actions are believed to be involved in prostate cancer development. The androgen-signaling pathway in the prostate gland is therefore one of the possible sites of intervention in prostate cancer prevention efforts. The central element of androgen signaling in the cell is the androgen receptor (AR), a member of the superfamily of nuclear receptors. Binding of androgen to its ligand-binding domain transforms the receptor to an active transcription factor that regulates gene expression by interacting with specific regulatory elements in the promoters of genes. In addition to this genomic action, the AR also interacts with other signaling pathways through protein-protein interaction, for example with AP-1 or Ets transcription factors. It is not only the action of androgenic hormones, but also the interactions with growth factor and protein kinase A-signaling pathways that can induce activation of AR. Moreover, these ligand-independent activators act synergistically together with low concentrations of androgens. The effects of long-term androgen deprivation on androgen signaling have been investigated in the LNCaP cell culture system. Long-term culture in a steroid-free medium results in a subline showing a hyperreactive AR characterized by increased AR expression and enhanced AR transcriptional activity in an environment with low levels of androgen hormones. It is not yet clear if similar changes also occur in normal or premalignant prostate epithelial cells and are thus relevant for prevention trials which interfere with androgen hormone signaling.

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor blockade inhibits the action of EGF, insulin-like growth factor I, and a protein kinase A activator on the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in prostate cancer cell lines.

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) are potent mitogens that regulate proliferation of prostate cancer cells via autocrine and paracrine loops and promote tumor metastasis. They exert their action through binding to the corresponding cell surface receptors that initiate an intracellular phosphorylation cascade, leading to the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), which recruit transcription factors. We have studied the effects of EGF, IGF-I, and the protein kinase A (PKA) activator forskolin on the activation of p42/ extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)2, which is a key kinase in mediation of growth factor-induced mitogenesis in prostate cancer cells. The activity of p42/ERK2 was determined by immune complex kinase assays and by immunoblotting using a phospho p44/p42 MAPK-specific antibody. EGF, IGF-I, and forskolin-induced PKA activity stimulate intracellular signaling pathways converging at the level of p42/ERK2. In the androgen-insensitive DU145 cell line, there is a constitutive basal p42/ ERK2 activity that is not present in androgen-sensitive LNCaP cells. Constitutive p42/ERK2 activity is abrogated by blockade of the EGF receptor. Hence, it is obviously caused by an autocrine loop involving this receptor. The effects of EGF on p42/ERK2 are potentiated by forskolin in both cell lines. The blockade of PKA by the specific inhibitor H89 attenuates this synergism. This finding is in contrast to those obtained in several other systems studied thus far, in which PKA activators inhibited MAPKs. p42/ERK2 in DU145 cells is highly responsive to IGF-I stimulation, whereas no effect of IGF-I on p42/ERK2 can be measured in LNCaP cells. Moreover, our results demonstrate that selective blockade of the EGF receptor in prostate cancer cells does not only inhibit the action of EGF, but also IGF-I-induced activation of the MAPK pathway and the interaction with the PKA pathway. In conclusion, these findings offer new possibilities for a therapeutical intervention in prostate cancer by targeting signaling pathways of growth factors and PKA.