Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and relapse in patients with clinical stage IS testicular cancer.

PURPOSE: Clinical stage I (CSI) testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT) represents disease confined to the testis without metastasis and CSIS is defined as persistently elevated tumor markers (TM) after orchiectomy, indicating subclinical metastatic disease. This study aims at assessing clinical characteristics and oncological outcome in CSIS. METHODS: Data from five tertiary referring centers in Germany were screened. We defined correct classification of CSIS according to EAU guidelines. TM levels, treatment and relapse-free survival were assessed and differences between predefined groups (chemotherapy, correct/incorrect CSIS) were analyzed with Fisher's exact and Chi-square test. RESULTS: Out of 2616 TGCT patients, 43 (1.6%) were CSIS. Thereof, 27 were correctly classified (cCSIS, 1.03%) and 16 incorrectly classified (iCSIS). TMs that defined cCSIS were in 12 (44.4%), 10 (37%), 3 (11.1%) and 2 (7.4%) patients AFP, ß-HCG, AFP plus ß-HCG and LDH, respectively. In the cCSIS group, six patients were seminoma and 21 non-seminoma. Treatment consisted of active surveillance, carboplatin-mono AUC7 and BEP (bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin). No difference between cCSIS and iCSIS with respect to applied chemotherapy was found (p = 0.830). 5-year relapse-free survival was 88.9% and three patients (11%) in the cCSIS group relapsed. All underwent salvage treatment (3xBEP) with no documented death. CONCLUSION: Around 1% of all TGCT were classified as cCSIS patients. Identification of cCSIS is of critical importance to avoid disease progression and relapses by adequate treatment. We report a high heterogeneity of treatment patterns, associated with excellent long-term survival irrespective of the initial treatment approach.

[Prognostic Value of Preoperative Anaemia and Perioperative Blood Transfusion in Surgical Treatment of Rectal Cancer]. / Prognostischer Wert präoperativer Anämie und perioperativer Fremdbluttransfusion in der chirurgischen Therapie des Rektumkarzinoms.

INTRODUCTION: There is evidence for the prognostic value of perioperative blood transfusion in the surgical treatment of patients with rectal cancer in the current literature. Also preoperative anaemia seems to have an impact on the outcome of these patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of preoperative anaemia and perioperative blood transfusion in patients with rectal cancer treated in our hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 208 patients (81 females, 127 males; median age, 67 years) with rectal cancer were included in this retrospective study. All patients received surgical treatment. In 75 % of the patients an anterior rectum resection was performed while 25 % received an abdominoperineal rectum exstirpation. Patients with neoadjuvant treatment were included and statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: 107 (51.4 %) patients exhibited preoperative anaemia. Patients with neoadjuvant treatment presented with significantly lower preoperative Hb (haemoglobin) values than patients without neoadjuvant treatment (p = 0.022). Patients with preoperative anaemia received significantly more blood transfusions (p = 0.001), had significantly longer hospital stays (p = 0.023) and significantly lower 5-years overall survival (p = 0.005). Blood transfusion was necessary in 82 patients (39.4 %). These patients presented with a significantly higher rate of perioperative complications (p = 0.01) and a lower 5-years overall survival (p = 0.002). In multivariate analyses neither preoperative anaemia nor perioperative transfusion was a significant prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: In our study preoperative anaemia and perioperative blood transfusion seems to have an impact on outcome of surgical treatment of patients with rectal cancer. However, in multivariate analyses neither preoperative anaemia nor perioperative transfusion was a significant prognostic factor.