Impact of coronary artery disease on outcome after transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system.

BACKGROUND: The clinical impact of coronary artery disease (CAD) on the prognosis of patients undergoing MitraClip implantation is still unclear. METHODS: One thousand nine hundred fifty-three patients undergoing MitraClip implantation included in the multicenter GIOTTO Registry were stratified according to CAD. Endpoints were all-cause death, cardiac death, and re-hospitalization for heart failure at follow-up (median 15.8 months). RESULTS: Although younger, CAD patients were more symptomatic, had worse cardiovascular risk profile, higher burden of comorbidities, more frequently affected by functional MR, with higher left ventricle (LV) diameters and lower ejection fraction (EF). At follow-up, CAD patients showed higher rates of all-cause death (25.4% vs. 19.6%; P=0.002), cardiovascular death (14.0% vs. 10.1%; P=0.007) and re-hospitalization for heart failure (13.9% vs. 10.2%; P=0.011). Dividing the population according to mitral regurgitation (MR) etiology (functional vs. non-functional MR), no differences were observed between CAD and no-CAD patients. At multivariate logistic regression, NYHA III/IV class, prior heart failure hospitalization, severe chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, LV end-diastolic diameter and LVEF<30% but not CAD resulted independent predictors of all-cause death. The same finding was confirmed even after propensity score adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: CAD did not show a relevant impact on mid-term prognosis per se, but seemed to identify a more complex and diseased cohort of patients with worse clinical and functional status.

MitraClip™ implantation plus left atrial appendage occlusion in a hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia patient.

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia is regarded as a high hemorrhagic risk condition, and the management of anticoagulation and heart surgery in these patients can be challenging. The authors describe a combined percutaneous treatment of mitral regurgitation and left atrial appendage occlusion in a patient affected by hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia and atrial fibrillation, supporting the safety and feasibility of the procedure and the optimal short-term outcome.

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia is a disease that carries a high risk of bleeding because of the growth of blood vessels with weak walls. The authors describe the case of a patient with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia needing an intervention for mitral valve regurgitation and anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation. To reduce the bleeding risk, two innovative techniques were used: the mitral valve disease was treated with the percutaneous implantation of stitches without open chest surgery and the left atrial appendage was contextually occluded thanks to another mini-invasive procedure to avoid the need for anticoagulation.

Safety of reduced or absent antithrombotic therapy after left atrial appendage closure in patients affected by hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia and atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure represents a novel therapeutic chance for patients with contraindications to long-term anticoagulation therapy, such as those affected by hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) and atrial fibrillation (AF). Nevertheless, current experts' indications suggest the postprocedural administration of antithrombotic therapies to minimize the residual thromboembolic risk due to AF and to the need for device endothelialization. The aim of our study was to investigate the safety and effectiveness of LAA closure in preventing arterial thromboembolism in a very high-bleeding risk group, such as HHT patients, who are at risk not to tolerate even the mild postprocedural antithrombotic therapy usually recommended. METHODS: Eight HHT-affected patients with non-valvular AF, high-bleeding risk and/or known intolerance to antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy were treated with interventional LAA occlusion with the Amplatzer™ Cardiac Plug™ and Amplatzer™ Amulet™ devices. Device implantation was successful in all patients. RESULTS: Postprocedural antiplatelet/anticoagulation therapy was attempted in seven patients: adherence to therapy exceeded 6 months only for one, while four patients suspended all antithrombotic medications within 30 days from the procedure due to an increase in bleeding frequency and/or severity and the other two discontinued treatment within 6 months; a single patient was not prescribed any antithrombotic therapy. At a medium follow-up of 22.4±14.3 months no thromboembolic episodes attributable to AF or device related thrombosis were reported. Two deaths were recorded 1231 and 783 days after the procedure which were classified as unrelated to any cerebral or cardiovascular accident. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the percutaneous LAA closure in HHT patients with AF could be safe and effective in preventing arterial systemic thromboembolism, also in the presence of reduced or absent postinterventional antithrombotic treatment. LAA occluder implantation can represent a valid and potentially life-saving alternative to lifelong anticoagulant therapy in HHT, as in other very high-bleeding risk patients.

Clinical use of cangrelor: a real-world multicenter experience from South Italy.

BACKGROUND: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with acetylsalicylic acid and oral P2Y12 inhibitor (P2Y12-I) represents the standard of care for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Cangrelor, the first intravenous P2Y12-I, is deemed to overcome the drawbacks of the oral administration; nevertheless, real world data on this new drug are scanty. We sought to investigate routine clinical use of cangrelor in four interventional centers of Italy. METHODS: We enrolled 241 consecutive patients (196 ACS, 45 CCS) treated with cangrelor during PCI. Drug administration modalities and in-hospital clinical outcomes were evaluated. A subanalysis in patients selected based on the CHAMPION Phoenix trial inclusion/exclusion criteria (CHAMPION-like subpopulation) was also performed. RESULTS: Cangrelor was mainly utilized in ACS patients, who presented poorer clinical conditions and higher bleeding risk. Cangrelor was given only in P2Y12-I naïve patients; switch to clopidogrel was always done at the end of the infusion, while ticagrelor or prasugrel were prevalently given 30 minutes before. In-hospital mortality was 10.0% and GUSTO moderate/severe bleeding was 2.5%. Bleeding data showed nevertheless to be in line with the CHAMPION Phoenix results in the "CHAMPION-like" subpopulation. CONCLUSIONS: Cangrelor was predominantly used in ACS with modalities substantially in accord with the label indications. Poor clinical outcomes are due to the prevalent utilization in highly challenging clinical settings, nevertheless the rate of bleeding and stent thrombosis are in line with the randomized trials if analyzed in a subpopulation of comparable risk profile.

Prognostic value of 12-leads admission electrocardiogram in low-risk patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac involvement significantly contributes to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mortality.12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) represents a fast, cheap, and easy to perform exam with the adjunctive advantage of the remote reporting possibility. In this study, we sought to investigate if electrocardiographic parameters can identify patients, deemed at low-risk at admission, who will face in-hospital unfavorable course. METHODS: From March 1, 2020, through March 30, 2021, 384 consecutive patients with confirmed low-risk COVID-19 were hospitalized at the University Hospital of Bari (Italy). Criteria for low risk were: admission to the division of Pneumology or Infectious Diseases, no need for immediate (within 24 hours from admission) transfer to Intensive Care Unit or for respiratory support with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or for circulation support (either mechanical or pharmacological). Admission ECGs were reviewed and interpreted by two expert cardiologists. The primary outcomes were in-hospital death and the composite outcome of in-hospital death and IMV. RESULTS: In low-risk COVID-19 patients, atrial fibrillation (AF), poor R wave progression (PRWP), tachycardia, and right bundle branch block (RBBB) resulted as statistically significant and independent predictors of in-hospital all-cause mortality; AF, PRWP, Tachycardia, RBBB, and corrected QT interval showed to be statistically significant and independent risk factors for the occurrence of the composite endpoint of death and IMV. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated for the first time that RBBB and PRWP, assessed upon admission with ECG, are associated with unfavorable clinical course in a baseline low-risk population hospitalized for COVID-19.