Gradual adaptation to auditory frequency mismatch.

What is the best way to help humans adapt to a distorted sensory input? Interest in this question is more than academic. The answer may help facilitate auditory learning by people who became deaf after learning language and later received a cochlear implant (a neural prosthesis that restores hearing through direct electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve). There is evidence that some cochlear implants (which provide information that is spectrally degraded to begin with) stimulate neurons with higher characteristic frequency than the acoustic frequency of the original stimulus. In other words, the stimulus is shifted in frequency with respect to what the listener expects to hear. This frequency misalignment may have a negative influence on speech perception by CI users. However, a perfect frequency-place alignment may result in the loss of important low frequency speech information. A trade-off may involve a gradual approach: start with correct frequency-place alignment to allow listeners to adapt to the spectrally degraded signal first, and then gradually increase the frequency shift to allow them to adapt to it over time. We used an acoustic model of a cochlear implant to measure adaptation to a frequency-shifted signal, using either the gradual approach or the "standard" approach (sudden imposition of the frequency shift). Listeners in both groups showed substantial auditory learning, as measured by increases in speech perception scores over the course of fifteen one-hour training sessions. However, the learning process was faster for listeners who were exposed to the gradual approach. These results suggest that gradual rather than sudden exposure may facilitate perceptual learning in the face of a spectrally degraded, frequency-shifted input. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled .

The effect of perimodiolar placement on speech perception and frequency discrimination by cochlear implant users.

CONCLUSION: Neither speech understanding nor frequency discrimination ability was better in Nucleus Contour users than in Nucleus 24 straight electrode users. Furthermore, perimodiolar electrode placement does not result in better frequency discrimination. OBJECTIVES: We addressed three questions related to perimodiolar electrode placement. First, do patients implanted with the Contour electrode understand speech better than with an otherwise identical device that has a straight electrode? Second, do these groups have different frequency discrimination abilities? Third, is the distance of the electrode from the modiolus related to frequency discrimination ability? SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Contour and straight electrode users were matched on four important variables. We then tested these listeners on CNC word and HINT sentence identification tasks, and on a formant frequency discrimination task. We also examined X-rays and measured the distance of the electrodes from the modiolus to determine whether there is a relationship between this factor and frequency discrimination ability. RESULTS: Both speech understanding and frequency discrimination abilities were similar for listeners implanted with the Contour vs a straight electrode. Furthermore, there was no linear relationship between electrode-modiolus distance and frequency discrimination ability. However, we did note a second-order relationship between these variables, suggesting that frequency discrimination is worse when the electrodes are either too close or too far away from the modiolus.

Development of language and speech perception in congenitally, profoundly deaf children as a function of age at cochlear implantation.

Like any other surgery requiring anesthesia, cochlear implantation in the first few years of life carries potential risks, which makes it important to assess the potential benefits. This study introduces a new method to assess the effect of age at implantation on cochlear implant outcomes: developmental trajectory analysis (DTA). DTA compares curves representing change in an outcome measure over time (i.e. developmental trajectories) for two groups of children that differ along a potentially important independent variable (e.g. age at intervention). This method was used to compare language development and speech perception outcomes in children who received cochlear implants in the second, third or fourth year of life. Within this range of age at implantation, it was found that implantation before the age of 2 resulted in speech perception and language advantages that were significant both from a statistical and a practical point of view. Additionally, the present results are consistent with the existence of a 'sensitive period' for language development, a gradual decline in language acquisition skills as a function of age.

Acoustic and electrical pattern analysis of consonant perceptual cues used by cochlear implant users.

It is hypothesized that for postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant (CI) users, a significant source of their perceptual performance variability is attributable to differences in their ability to discriminate the basic perceptual cues that are important in speech recognition. Previous research on 'electric hearing' has identified consistent perceptual cues for vowel recognition. However, the results on consonant perception by CI users are less clear. The primary purpose of this study is to present a quantitative method of evaluating potential 'electric cues' used by CI users in consonant identification. Since the actual input signals to the auditory periphery of CI users are electric in nature, we elected to measure the CI electric discharge patterns in addition to the original acoustic waveforms. The characteristics of the electric discharge patterns in response to intervocalic consonants were quantified and correlated with the dimensions of CI patients' perceptual spaces, which were computed from multidimensional scaling analyses of their consonant confusion matrices. The results agree with most, but not all, commonly accepted acoustic cues used by normal-hearing listeners. The correlation findings also suggest that CI users employ different sets of 'electric cues' in perceiving consonants that differ in their manner of articulation. Specifically, spectral and temporal cues associated with slowly changing formant structures and transitions, and features associated with frication and high-frequency noise, are all highly correlated with the perceptual dimensions of all CI users. However, rapidly changing formant transitions, such as those present in stop consonants, did not appear to play a significant role in consonant recognition by more poorly performing CI subjects. The perceptual results were consistent with our physical findings that the SPEAK coding strategy partially degraded the rapidly changing formant transitions.