The Na(+)/H(+) exchange inhibitor eniporide as an adjunct to early reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Results of the evaluation of the safety and cardioprotective effects of eniporide in acute myocardial infarction (ESCAMI) trial.

OBJECTIVES: We conducted an international, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial in patients undergoing thrombolytic therapy or primary angioplasty for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) to investigate the effect of eniporide on infarct size and clinical outcome. BACKGROUND: Experimental studies suggest that the activity of the Na(+)/H(+) exchange (NHE) plays an important role in the unfavorable sequels of myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Eniporide specifically inhibits the NHE-1 isoform and has been shown to limit infarct size in experimental models. METHODS: The primary efficacy end point was the infarct size measured by the cumulative release of alpha-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase (alpha-HDBH) (area under the curve [AUC] 0 to 72 h). In stage 1, 50, 100, 150 or 200 mg eniporide given as a 10-min infusion before start of reperfusion therapy were compared with placebo in 430 patients, and in stage 2, 100 and 150 mg eniporide were compared with placebo in 959 patients. RESULTS: In stage 1, the administration of 100 mg and 150 mg eniporide resulted in smaller infarct sizes (mean alpha-HBDH AUC in U/ml x h, placebo: 44.2, 100 mg eniporide: 40.2, 150 mg eniporide: 33.9), especially in the angioplasty group. In contrast, in stage 2 there was no difference in the enzymatic infarct size between the three groups (placebo: 41.2, 100 mg eniporide: 43.0, 150 mg eniporide: 41.5). Overall there was no effect of eniporide on clinical outcome (death, cardiogenic shock, heart failure, life-threatening arrhythmias). However, there was a significant reduction of the incidence of heart failure in patients reperfused late (>4 h). CONCLUSIONS: In this large study administration of the NHE-1 inhibitor eniporide, before reperfusion therapy in patients with acute ST elevation MI, did not limit infarct size or improve clinical outcome.

Extent of ST-segment deviation in the single ECG lead of maximum deviation present 90 or 180 minutes after start of thrombolytic therapy best predicts outcome in acute myocardial infarction.

UNLABELLED: In evolving myocardial infarction the extent of ST segment deviation reflects the existing ischemic myocardial injury and thus conveys very useful early prognostic information. In recent years, the sum of ST segment elevation resolution (sum STR) has been proven to be an excellent early prognostic indicator. However, the predictive power of sum STR has never been systematically compared with that of other methods of evaluation of ST segment deviation recovery. We, therefore, proposed to compare the prognostic power of ST segment changes evaluated by either sum STR or by ST segment resolution in only the one lead showing the maximal deviation (lead STR) or only by the existing ST segment deviation in the single ECG lead of maximum ST deviation present at a given time point after thrombolysis (lead STE). METHODS AND RESULTS: In conjunction with the Intravenous nPA for Treatment of Infarcting Myocardium Early (InTIME) II Study, which compared mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction randomized within 6 hours of symptom onset to receive either Lanoteplase or Alteplase, all 3593 German and Polish patients participated in an ST segment resolution substudy. A 12-lead ECG was recorded at baseline and at 90 and at 180 minutes after start of thrombolytic therapy. The areas under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves to compare the power to predict 30 day cardiac mortality for sum STR, lead STR, and lead STE were at 90 min 0.686, 0.714, and 0.761 (p < 0.002), and at 180 min 0.678, 0.703, and 0.755 (p < 0.001), respectively. In multivariate analysis lead STE was an independent predictor of outcome even when adjustment was made for sum STR, lead STR, and clinical variables. Cardiac mortality rates at 30 days for lead STE risk groups, classified as low, medium, or high (percent of patients in brackets), were at 90 min 1.0% (43%), 4.0% (32%), and 12.8% (25%), and at 180 min 1.5% (55%), 3.8% (31%), and 15.2% (14%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Simple measurement of the ST segment deviation existing in the one ECG lead with the greatest deviation on the ECG recorded 90 or 180 minutes after thrombolysis enables the identification of the major subsets of patients who are either at very low or exceptionally high risk of mortality.

Non-invasive detection of early infarct vessel patency by resolution of ST-segment elevation in patients with thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction; results of the angiographic substudy of the Hirudin for Improvement of Thrombolysis (HIT)-4 trial.

Aims The purpose of this study was to validate ST segment resolution as a non-invasive marker for patency of the infarct-related artery 90 min after the start of streptokinase therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Methods and Results In the HIT-4 angiographic substudy, 447 patients with acute myocardial infarction or =70% ST resolution (n=70) had a 92% probability of TIMI 2/3 flow, while <30% ST resolution (n=172) was associated with the absence of TIMI 3 flow in 84% of patients. Conclusions Despite fairly good sensitivities and specificities the prediction of infarct vessel patency by ST resolution in the individual patient is limited. However, patients with > or =70% ST resolution are likely to have a patent infarct artery and <30% ST resolution predicts epicardial vessel occlusion or, since persistent ST elevation reflects the existing ischaemic myocardial injury, absence of myocardial perfusion.

Safety and preliminary efficacy of one month glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition with lefradafiban in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-elevation; a phase II study.

AIMS: Oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors might enhance the early benefit of an intravenous agent and prevent subsequent cardiac events in patients with acute coronary syndromes. We assessed the safety and preliminary efficacy of 1 month treatment with three dose levels of the oral GP IIb/IIIa blocker lefradafiban in patients with unstable angina or myocardial infarction without persistent ST elevation. METHODS: The Fibrinogen Receptor Occupancy STudy (FROST) was designed as a dose-escalation trial with 20, 30 and 45 mg lefradafiban t.i.d. or placebo. Five hundred and thirty-one patients were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to lefradafiban or placebo in a double-blind manner. Efficacy was assessed by the incidence of death, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization and recurrent angina. Safety was evaluated by the occurrence of bleeding classified according to the TIMI criteria and by measuring clinical laboratory parameters. RESULTS: There was a trend towards a reduction in cardiac events with lefradafiban 30 mg when compared with placebo and lefradafiban 20 mg. The benefit was particularly apparent in patients with a positive (> or = O.1 ng. ml(-1)) troponin I test at baseline and less so in those with a negative test result. In patients receiving lefradafiban, the cardiac event rate decreased with increasing minimal levels of fibrinogen receptor occupancy. There was a dose-dependent increase in the incidence of bleeding: the composite of major or minor bleeding occurred in 1% of placebo patients, 5% of patients receiving lefradafiban 20 mg and in 7% of patients receiving 30 mg, with an excessive risk (15%) in the 45 mg group which resulted in early discontinuation of this dose level. Gingival and arterial or venous puncture site bleedings were most common and accounted for more than 60% of all haemorrhagic events. There was an increased incidence of neutropenia (neutrophils <1. 5 x 10(9)/l) in the lefradafiban groups (5.2% vs 1.5% in the placebo group), which did not result from bone marrow depression but rather from a reversible redistribution of neutrophils by margination or clustering. CONCLUSION: One month's treatment with the oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor lefradafiban in patients with unstable angina and myocardial infarction without persistent ST elevation resulted in a decrease in cardiac events with lefradafiban 30 mg and a dose-dependent increase in haemorrhagic events. The observed favourable trend towards a reduction in cardiac events in patients with elevated troponin levels requires confirmation in a large clinical trial.

Safety and efficacy of eptifibatide vs placebo in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase for acute myocardial infarction; a phase II dose escalation, randomized, double-blind study.

AIMS: Thrombolytic therapy restores coronary patency in patients with acute myocardial infarction, although normal perfusion (TIMI 3 flow) is not achieved in all patients. In an attempt to improve TIMI 3 flow, a combination of full-dose streptokinase, aspirin and escalating dosages of a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blocker, eptifibatide, vs placebo were tested. METHODS AND RESULTS: A bolus of 180 microg. kg(-1)of eptifibatide was administered in each group, followed by a 72 h continuous infusion of 0.75 (44 patients), 1.33 (n=45) and 2.00 microg. kg(-1). min(-1)(n = 30); 62 patients received placebo. Normal perfusion (TIMI 3 flow) at 90 min was observed in 31% of placebo patients compared to 46, 42 and 45% in the ascending eptifibatide groups (44% for combined eptifibatide groups, P = 0.07). Patency (TIMI 2 and 3 flow combined) increased from 61% (placebo) to 78% for the combined eptifibatide groups (P = 0.02). Reocclusion was infrequent. No differences were observed in TIMI flow grades among eptifibatide groups. Major and minor bleeding was increased and occurred mainly at the arterial puncture site. CONCLUSION: A combination of full dose streptokinase with different eptifibatide regimens enhanced coronary perfusion, but bleeding risk was excessive. Additional trials are needed with different dosage regimens to determine the optimal combination of fibrinolytic agents and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockers.

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of left main stenosis--results of the German PTCA registry.

In cases with protected left main stenosis by previous bypass surgery or as an emergency intervention in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty is performed as an alternative treatment strategy to bypass surgery. A review of 262 left main angioplasties revealed a procedure-related mortality in cases without protection of the left main coronary artery of 9.1% (4/44), in cases with partially protected left main stenosis by collaterals to either left coronary artery of 4.8% (1/21) and 0.5% (1/187) in cases with nonobstructed bypass grafts to either left coronary artery. Coronary angioplasty of an unprotected left main coronary artery, had an unacceptably high procedure-related mortality rate and should therefore not be performed even in cases of emergency intervention. The risk stratification of the procedure can be evaluated by the proposed grading of left main artery protection.

Thrombolysis and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the developed countries. Thrombotic occlusion of a coronary artery has been shown to cause acute myocardial infarction in over 90% of the cases. Early and complete restoration of bloodflow in the infarct-related coronary artery is the principal mechanism by which reperfusion therapy improves outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Thrombolytic therapy has been shown to reduce mortality when given early after symptom onset. However, even the most effective, approved thrombolytic regimens achieve normal (so-called TIMI 3) flow in the infarct vessel at 60-90 minutes only in about half of the patients and reocclusion occurs in 5-10%. Bleeding events, especially intracranial bleedings, observed in up to 1% of the patients, are the most severe complication of thrombolysis. Primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is associated with somewhat higher patency rates and significantly fewer strokes than thrombolysis, but confers a reocclusion rate of about 5-10% and it is not universally available. While smaller randomized studies suggested a significant advantage of PTCA over thrombolysis, these results could not be confirmed in the larger GUSTO IIb angioplasty study in over 1000 patients and in non-randomized comparisons in large registries. Therefore, a general mortality advantage of PTCA over thrombolysis could not be demonstrated. Primary PTCA should be preferred in patients with contraindications against thrombolysis, patients with a high risk for intracranial bleedings (age > 75 and high blood pressure on admission) and hemodynamically unstable patients. There are several approaches to improve outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction: new fibrinolytic agents may improve early infarct related patency, single bolus administration of thrombolytics may reduce time-to-treatment, stent implantation may improve direct PTCA, enhanced thrombin and platelet inhibition may facilitate both, thrombolysis and primary PTCA, enhance reperfusion on the cellular level and reduce reocclusions and ultimately improve prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Effects of controlled-release metoprolol on total mortality, hospitalizations, and well-being in patients with heart failure: the Metoprolol CR/XL Randomized Intervention Trial in congestive heart failure (MERIT-HF). MERIT-HF Study Group.

CONTEXT: Results from recent studies on the effects of beta1-blockade in patients with heart failure demonstrated a 34% reduction in total mortality. However, the effect of beta1-blockade on the frequency of hospitalizations, symptoms, and quality of life in patients with heart failure has not been fully explored. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of the beta1-blocker controlled-release/extended-release metoprolol succinate (metoprolol CR/XL) on mortality, hospitalization, symptoms, and quality of life in patients with heart failure. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind controlled trial, preceded by a 2-week single-blind placebo run-in period, conducted from February 14, 1997, to October 31, 1998, with a mean follow-up of 1 year. SETTING: Three hundred thirteen sites in 14 countries. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n = 3991) with chronic heart failure, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II to IV, and ejection fraction of 0.40 or less who were stabilized with optimum standard therapy. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to metoprolol CR/XL, 25 mg once per day (NYHA class II), or 12.5 mg once per day (NYHA class III or IV), titrated for 6 to 8 weeks up to a target dosage of 200 mg once per day (n = 1990); or matching placebo (n = 2001). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total mortality or any hospitalization (time to first event), number of hospitalizations for worsening heart failure, and change in NYHA class, by intervention group; quality of life was assessed in a substudy of 741 patients. RESULTS: The incidence of all predefined end points was lower in the metoprolol CR/XL group than in the placebo group, including total mortality or all-cause hospitalizations (the prespecified second primary end point; 641 vs 767 events; risk reduction, 19%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10%-27%; P<.001); total mortality or hospitalizations due to worsening heart failure (311 vs 439 events; risk reduction, 31%; 95% CI, 20%-40%; P<.001), number of hospitalizations due to worsening heart failure (317 vs 451; P<.001); and number of days in hospital due to worsening heart failure (3401 vs 5303 days; P<.001). NYHA functional class, assessed by physicians, and McMaster Overall Treatment Evaluation score, assessed by patients, both improved in the metoprolol CR/XL group compared with the placebo group (P = .003 and P = .009, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients with symptomatic heartfailure, metoprolol CR/XL improved survival, reduced the need for hospitalizations due to worsening heart failure, improved NYHA functional class, and had beneficial effects on patient well-being.

Determinants of mortality after cardiac surgery: results of the registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Kardiologischer Krankenhausärzte (ALKK) on 10 525 patients.

BACKGROUND: Mortality from cardiac surgery is an essential indicator of quality and forms the basis of treatment strategy decisions in eligible patients. No contemporary complete data on unselected adult cardiac surgery patients are available in Germany. METHODS AND RESULTS: A registry was started in June 1997 of all patients referred to surgery from 85 cardiology centres in Germany. The registry was intended to include 10 000 patients and this number was reached in March 1998. Follow-up of the patients was by simple questionnaire, reporting the date of surgery, major complications, and symptomatic improvement. If the questionnaire was not returned, a reminder letter was sent and, if necessary, further telephone investigations were performed. This resulted in 99.9% complete data. Of 10 525 patients operated on, 3.91% had died by 30 days after surgery. The overall operative mortality was 4.57%, which included 69 patients who died after more than 30 days from complications related to surgery. By multivariate analysis, the following predictors of mortality were identified: previous surgery, emergency or complex operation; age >75 years, female gender, cardiac failure, angina CCS class IV, and three-vessel coronary disease. An integral part of the registry was a pre-operative prediction of surgical risk in five categories. This risk estimate revealed a surprisingly correct prediction of the mortality observed. CONCLUSIONS: In a representative unselected group of cardiac surgery patients, operative mortality was 4.57%. Several procedural and clinical parameters were significantly correlated with mortality, but the risk increment by each of these factors was small. Unstructured clinical judgement reliably predicted the operative risk.

[Patency, perfusion and prognosis in acute myocardial infarct]. / Patency, Perfusion und Prognose beim akuten Herzinfarkt.

Early restoration of bloodflow in the infarct-related coronary artery is the principal mechanism by which early reperfusion therapies may improve outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction. The beneficial effect of reperfusion is independent of the therapy used (thrombolysis or PTCA), but, as shown in many studies, depends very much on the time to reperfusion. The achievement of a normal bloodflow in the infarct vessel, the so called TIMI 3 patency is considered to be the gold standard for the evaluation of the success of reperfusion therapy. However, there is increasing evidence from recent studies, that restoration of epicardial bloodflow does not necessarily indicate perfusion at the myocardial level. As unequivocally shown by contrast echocardiography using intracoronary injections of microbubbles, this is true even for TIMI Grade 3 flow, which correlates most strongly with prognosis and usually is associated with a very low mortality of about 3 to 4%. Angiographic patency not only is a sometimes unreliable indicator of myocardial reperfusion, but also involves an invasive procedure, is expensive and not universally available. A readily available and simple indicator of reperfusion is the early resolution of ST segment elevation. Complete ST resolution at 90 or 180 minutes after the initiation of treatment is associated with an excellent prognosis, even better than TIMI 3 patency. In contrast, no ST resolution indicates an in-hospital mortality which is about 8-fold greater than with complete ST resolution. Since ST resolution may be more closely related with the relief of ischemia than angiographic patency, the prognostic power of the combination of both indicators should be greater than that of either of them alone. Thus, it is evident from many studies that patency of the infarct-related artery is necessary for myocardial salvage in acute myocardial infarction, but it has to be achieved rapidly and has to be complete and sustained. However, even an early and perfect angiographic result achieved by thrombolysis or PTCA, does not consistently indicate myocardial reperfusion, and the mechanisms of the often called no-reflow phenomenon are still poorly understood. The possible contribution of reperfusion injury to poor clinical outcomes after adequate epicardial flow has been restored is also a matter of controversy and deserves further research. Promising results were derived from studies with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, in which improved microvascular flow and myocardial reperfusion were observed, when these agents were used as adjunct to thrombolysis and PTCA.

[Enzymatic markers of reperfusion in acute myocardial infarct. With data from the ISAM study]. / Enzymatische Marker der Reperfusion bei akutem Myokardinfarkt. Mit Daten aus der I.S.A.M.-Studie.

Despite advances in therapy acute myocardial infarction is associated with a mortality rate of up to 30%. Early and complete reperfusion of the infarct related artery (defined as TIMI flow 3 at 90 minutes following therapy) as obtained with thrombolytic therapy in 50 to 80% of patients improves survival and enhances ventricular function. Failure to achieve recanalization should prompt further intervention (second attempt of thrombolysis or rescue-PTCA). Various cardiac markers known from diagnosing acute myocardial infarction or risk stratification in unstable angina pectoris have been assessed in their ability to predict successful reperfusion/failure of therapy. Following reperfusion creatinkinase (CK) and its isoform CK-MB, troponin and myoglobin show an early and rapid rise to a high maximum value with rapid normalization. For creatinkinase time to peak values of less than 9 hours or rates of increase of > 50 U/h (> or = 10 U/h for CK-MB activity) within the first 2.5 hours following thrombolysis have been suggested as useful indicators of successful reperfusion. The same applies for a troponin (T)slope > 0.5 ng/ml/h within the first hour (Table 5). The major limitation in applying either creatinkinase, troponin or even lactatdehydrogenase (LDH) is their comparatively late release (4 to 6 hours) following myocardial infarction. In that respect myoglobin (though not specific for cardiac injury) seems ideal for guidance of intervention after failed thrombolysis. The I.S.A.M. study included 1,741 patients with acute myocardial infarction of less than 6 hours duration being given either streptokinase or placebo. Serial blood samples for measurement of cardiac enzymes were drawn within the first 50 hours. In the streptokinase group the time to peak concentration of CK-MB activity was significantly lower (mean 10.9 hours vs 16.1 hours following initiation of treatment) as was the area under the CK-MB curve indicating reduction of infarct size (Table 2). A substudy investigating the myoglobin release in 120 patients having received streptokinase or placebo demonstrated higher maximum values in the streptokinase group (mean 3008 vs 2097 ng/ml), a shorter time to peak interval following treatment (3.4 vs 6.5 hours) and a reduction in infarct size as suggested by a smaller area under the myoglobin curve (17,377 vs 23,240 ng/ml x h) (Table 3). For LDH/alpha-HBDH the reduction in time to peak intervals was less impressive (Table 4). In angiographic studies with TIMI flow 3 at 90 minutes in the infarct related artery in 22 patients (Figure 5) the maximum myoglobin value was reached in less than 4.2 hours (mean value plus SEM) following treatment (9.5 hours for CK-MB activity). Therefore, myoglobin seems to be the preferred marker in reperfusion assessment.

Recombinant hirudin (lepirudin) for the improvement of thrombolysis with streptokinase in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results of the HIT-4 trial.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare recombinant hirudin and heparin as adjuncts to streptokinase thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: Experimental studies and previous small clinical trials suggest that specific thrombin inhibition improves early patency rates and clinical outcome in patients treated with streptokinase. METHODS: In a randomized double-blind, multicenter trial, 1,208 patients with AMI < or =6 h were treated with aspirin and streptokinase and randomized to receive recombinant hirudin (lepirudin, i.v. bolus of 0.2 mg/kg, followed by subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of 0.5 mg/kg b.i.d. for 5 to 7 days) or heparin (i.v. placebo bolus, followed by s.c. injections of 12,500 IU b.i.d. for 5 to 7 days). A total of 447 patients were included in the angiographic substudy in which the primary end point, 90-min Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3 of the infarct-related artery, was evaluated, while the other two-thirds served as "safety group" in which only clinical end points were evaluated. As an additional efficacy parameter the ST-segment resolution at 90 and 180 min was measured in all patients. RESULTS: TIMI flow grade 3 was observed in 40.7% in the lepirudin and in 33.5% in the heparin group (p = 0.16), respectively. In the entire study population the proportion of patients with complete ST resolution at 90 min (28% vs. 22%, p = 0.05) and at 180 min (52% vs. 48%, p = 0.18) after start of therapy tended to be higher in the lepirudin group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of hemorrhagic stroke (0.2% vs. 0.3%) or total stroke (1.2% vs. 1.5%), reinfarction rate (4.6% vs. 5.1%) and total mortality rate (6.8% vs. 6.4%) at 30 days, as well as the combined end point of death, nonfatal stroke, nonfatal reinfarction, rescue-percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and refractory angina (22.7 vs. 24.3%) were not statistically different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Lepirudin as adjunct to thrombolysis with streptokinase did not significantly improve restoration of blood flow in the infarct vessel as assessed by angiography, but was associated with an accelerated ST resolution. There was no increase in the risk of major bleedings with lepirudin compared to heparin.

[Therapy of acute myocardial infarct--primary PTCA or thrombolysis?]. / Therapie des akuten Myokardinfarkts--Primäre PTCA oder Thrombolyse?

Since reperfusion of the infarct-related coronary artery has been established as a mainstay in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) mechanical recanalization by direct angioplasty has been used as an alternative to the standard treatment with thrombolysis. Direct PTCA is more efficient than thrombolysis in terms of reperfusion rates, whereas thrombolysis is more readily available. Thrombolysis reduces mortality from AMI by approximately 25%. The clinical efficacy is strongly time-dependent, and treatment within the first hour of AMI improves survival by nearly 50% by preventing transmural infarction in a significant proportion of the patients. The disadvantage of thrombolysis is its limited efficacy in terms of rapid, complete and sustained patency of the infarct vessel yielding optimal results in only 50% of the patients. Direct PTCA is generally agreed to be more efficient to recanalize the infarct vessel, but its clinical advantage remains controversial. The first randomized studies of direct PTCA in AMI from highly specialized centers in selected patients reported success rates of coronary reperfusion up to 97% resulting in a trend to less death and reinfarction, but the differences were significant only in a metaanalysis of these small studies. The real world of direct PTCA has been depicted by a large registry in Germany of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Kardiologischer Krankenhausärzte (ALKK) now including more than 4,000 direct PTCA-procedures since 1994. In this registry, the success rate of direct PTCA was 87% as defined by a final TIMI-grade 3 perfusion of the infarct vessel which is close to the data of the MITI-registry and the GUSTO IIb study. Failed PTCA was associated with an exceptionally high mortality rate of 36% confirming earlier observational reports. The non-randomized comparison of thrombolysis and direct PTCA in the MITI-registry showed no differene in survival or reinfarction rates, and the randomized GUSTO IIb substudy of direct PTCA versus front-loaded alteplase showed a small advantage in death and reinfarction rates at 30 days which dissipated over time leaving no significant clinical advantage of direct PTCA over thrombolysis at 6 months. Thus, in myocardial infarction in general the advantage of direct PTCA over thrombolysis is at best minimal. The reason is very probably the longer time lag until the procedure is started, the lower success rate as compared to the first reports of some specialized centers, and the clearly negative impact of failed PTCA on survival. Moreover, the immediate success of direct PTCA seems to be overestimated by the operator as demonstrated by comparison of central and local estimates of the TIMI flow rates in GUSTO IIb. Improvements of direct PTCA in AMI might be possible by coronary stenting which has markedly increased to more than 60% during the last year in the ALKK-registry. This was accompanied by a slight decrease in death and reinfarction rates. Further improvements can be expected from GP IIb/IIIa platelet antagonists which are under clinical investigation. It has been claimed, that in cardiogenic shock direct PTCA is more effective than thrombolysis. This hypothesis is based on comparison of failed versus successful PTCA-attempts, but this comparison is not valid since failed procedures clearly increase mortality. In the GUSTO-1 study patients with cardiogenic shock had lower mortality with than without an early coronary angiogram. This survival advantage, however, was independent of revascularization since only half of the patients with an early angiogram had PTCA. The same was observed in the International Shock Registry, reflecting significant selection bias in that patients in relatively better condition will be taken to the cathlab whereas apparently hopeless cases will not. In the ALKK-registry half of the patients in cardiogenic shock died after direct PTCA casting doubt on the presumed high clinical efficacy of this strategy. (ABST

[Prognostic significance of ST segment change in acute myocardial infarct]. / Prognostische Bedeutung der ST-Strecken-Veränderung beim akuten Myokardinfarkt.

The extent of ST segment elevation resolution (STR) 180 minutes after initiation of streptokinase treatment for acute myocardial infarction within 6 hours after onset of symptoms is an excellent early prognostic indicator that can be easily determined in all patients. This presentation is based on a meta-analysis from 3 thrombolysis studies including 3,912 patients. About 50% of patients had complete STR (> or = 70%). They had small enzymatic infarct sizes and well preserved left ventricular function associated with an excellent chance of survival. Patients with partial STR (< 70 to 30%) developed larger infarcts, but had still a relatively low mortality. To assess the optimal cut-off point that best predicts an increased mortality risk, the squared standardized log odds ratio statistics as a function of the hypothetical cut-off points in STR was used. A cut-off point around 30% STR was associated with an extraordinarily strong predictive power. The 35-day cardiac mortality with STR < 30% was 12.7% as compared to 2.1% for patients who had complete STR and 4.2% for those who had partial STR. Based on STR, age, medical history, and simple parameters at admission, a low risk population can be defined that includes about 50% of all patients aged < or = 70 years, and 20% of older patients. The 35-day and 1-year mortality rates for the group of younger patients was 1.4% and 2.7%, respectively, and for the older age group 5.0% and 7.9%. It appears highly unlikely that aggressive testing and interventions would have any measurable beneficial effect on such a good outcome. In thrombolytic therapy comparative trials STR may perform well as a surrogate endpoint, since it is more powerful than 90 minutes post-thrombolytic patency rates and early mortality, in a statistical sense. This is especially true for Phase-II dose-finding studies and the use as a surrogate or even primary endpoint in phase-III trials. In addition, STR may be very helpful for safety monitoring, interim analyses, and subgroup analyses in megatrials with the endpoint mortality. Use of STR can result in a substantial reduction in the required sample size. However, at least 1 pivotal mortality trial cannot be replaced by STR trials, since STR does not reflect the risk of intracranial hemorrhages and other bleeding complications.

[30-day mortality after heart surgery: a pilot project of the Working Party of Directors of Hospital Cardiology Departments]. / 30-Tage-Sterblichkeit nach Herzoperation. Ein Modellprojekt der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Kardiologischer Krankenhausärzte.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: 30-day mortality after operation is generally accepted as a central standard of quality, especially in regard to cardiac operations. The Working Party of Directors of Hospital Cardiology Departments (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Kardiologischer Krankenhausärzte, ALKK) in Germany set up a pilot project to analyse whether by direct communication with patients by a database centre the expenditure incurred in collecting complete data can be decisively reduced and full documentation of outcome can in this way be obtained even for a large multi-centre patient cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1.6.1997 and 31.3.1998, data were consecutively collected by questionnaire on all patients registered for a cardiac operation at 85 of the 135 ALKK centres. The questionnaire included data about each patient and the indication for operation as well as the estimate of operative risk, assigned to one of five risk categories by the referring cardiologist either alone or in conjunction with the cardiac surgeon. RESULTS: Until 30.9.1998, the data were obtained on 11,349 patients who had given informed consent (response rate 99.99%), including survival figures. 824 (7.3%) patients had not undergone the planned cardiac surgery, 134 having died before the data of operation. The 30-day postoperative mortality, obtained in 99.99% of the 10,525 patients, was 3.92%. The operative mortality was lowest, at 3.73%, for aortocoronary bypass only (n = 7932), highest for aortocoronary bypass plus valvular operation (n = 785), at 8.04%. There was good agreement between the cardiologists' preoperative risk assessment and the observed mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The 30-day mortality after cardiac operation can be obtained almost completely and with reasonable expenditure even for a large patient cohort. The results confirm that hospital mortality data definitely understate the overall operative risk. The methodology used in this pilot project, namely the inclusion of information from the patients by questionnaire, can also be applied to clinical results in other areas.

Comparison of the predictive value of ST segment elevation resolution at 90 and 180 min after start of streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. A substudy of the hirudin for improvement of thrombolysis (HIT)-4 study.

AIMS: Previous studies revealed that >/=70% or <30% ST segment elevation resolution 180 min after the start of thrombolysis is a strong predictor of either favourable or poor outcome. The aim of this study was to compare the prognostic value of ST segment elevation resolution at 90 and 180 min after the start of streptokinase infusion. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Hirudin for Improvement of Thrombolysis (HIT)-4 study of 1208 patients compared streptokinase therapy in conjunction with either r-hirudin or heparin. Complete ST segment elevation resolution (>/=70%) at 90 and 180 min identified 25% and 50%, respectively, of all patients with a 30 day cardiac mortality of less than 2%. Forty-four percent of patients had no ST segment elevation resolution (<30%) at 90 min and the 30 day cardiac mortality was 7.3%. At 180 min, the no ST segment elevation resolution group decreased to 15% of all patients while the mortality risk increased to 13.6%. CONCLUSIONS: ST segment elevation resolution is a useful tool for early risk stratification and the strategy of rescue angioplasty. Complete ST segment elevation resolution within 180 min of the start of streptokinase therapy indicates excellent survival prospects in 50% of patients. A half of these low risk patients can be identified at 90 min. A high risk group appears to be best characterized by no ST segment elevation resolution at 180 min rather than at 90 min.

Clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction.

Long-term follow-up of placebo-controlled thrombolysis trials has proven that the survival benefit from thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is maintained for up to 10 years. Ongoing research is being conducted with the aim to further improve early restoration of blood flow in the infarct vessel and, thus, reperfusion of the infarcted myocardium in patients with AMI, with the ultimate goal to improve survival. In two recent mega-trials, two new single-bolus fibrinolytics (lanoteplase and TNK-tissue plasminogen activator) were shown to be equivalent to front-loaded alteplase in reducing infarct mortality. The ease of application of these agents might help reduce the time from symptom onset to start of therapy. More potent thrombin inhibitors such as hirudin and hirulog seem to speed up thrombolysis with streptokinase and reduce the rate of reinfarctions. Very promising results are derived from angiographic trials combining reduced doses of thrombolytics with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Advances in mechanical revascularization can be achieved with the use of stents and better conjunctive therapies. All of these developments are expected to further improve clinical outcome of patients with AMI in the near future.