Effect of the lateral wall valgisation in the treatment of patients with endocrine orbitopathy.

Orbital decompression is an established procedure used to correct exophthalmos that results from excess orbital soft tissue. This study aimed to explore a new minimally-invasive technique that features three-dimensional planning and patient-specific implants for lateral valgisation (LAVA) of the orbital wall. We analysed the outcomes of this procedure in nine endocrine orbitopathy (EO) patients (32-65 years of age with a mean clinical activity score of 4.3) who underwent this procedure between 2021 and 2022, including seven patients diagnosed with dysthyroid optic neuropathy. The impact of LAVA and wall resection on orbital areas, volumes, Hertel values, visual acuity, and new-onset diplopia was determined. Among our results, we found that LAVA and resection of 18 orbital walls resulted in significant enlargement of the orbital volume from a preoperative mean of 30.8 ± 3.5 cm3 to a mean of 37.3 ± 5.8 cm3 postoperatively (mean difference, 6.2 ± 1.8 cm3; p < 0.001); this procedure also resulted in a significant reduction in the mean Hertel value, from 28.7 ± 1.9 mm to 20.0 ± 1.9 mm (mean difference, 8.7 ± 1.9 mm; p < 0.001). The procedure resulted in visual acuity declined in three patients (33.3 %) with reductions from 0.25 to 0.125, 0.8 to 0.125, and 1.2 to 0.7, respectively. No new diplopia occurred postoperatively, however, our study included five patients with preoperative diplopia that did not improve postoperatively and required additional surgical intervention. Similarly, four patients required supplemental eyelid surgery. In conclusion, our study suggests the effects of the LAVA with the partial floor resection seems to be effective, which provides a substantially improved outcome for patients undergoing surgical treatment of EO via the use of double navigation and piezosurgical methods.

How is neck dissection performed in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery? Results of a representative nationwide survey among university and non-university hospitals in Germany.

INTRODUCTION: Neck dissection (ND) is a surgical procedure addressing cervical lymph nodes and metastases in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). The aim of this study was to analyze clinical decisions regarding indications and variations of ND in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) in Germany. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A nationwide survey of the German Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery was performed using dynamic online questionnaires including 38 questions. Data about oncological centers, case numbers, and staging procedures were collected. Relevant aspects, such as inclusion of level IIb and levels IV and V to ND, uni- vs. bilateral ND, and the influence of extra-nodal extension (ENE) of metastases on extension of ND were evaluated. RESULTS: Eighty-four OMFS of university and non-university hospitals participated in the study (responding rate 21.4%). Sixty-six (78.57%) stated to work at certified cancer centers and 53.57% of the hospitals treated between 50 and 100 OSCC cases per year. CT and/or MRI of the head and neck was performed in most of the staging procedures. Level IIb was included by 71 (93.42%) of the participants in selective ND. Levels IV and V were included by 53 (69.74%) in node-positive neck. In solitary ipsilateral metastases (ENE-), 49 participants (62.82%) stated to perform exclusively an ipsilateral ND and 40 (51.95%) stated to perform only an ipsilateral ND in ENE+. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a high rate of certified cancer centers in Germany showing differences regarding staging procedures, indications, and extension of ND, especially in increasingly complex cases. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinical decisions regarding ND are dependent on case-individual aspects and must be decided individually.