Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23235904

RESUMO

Every year a large number of patients suffer from cardiac arrest and must be reanimated. The German Resuscitation Registry was founded in 2007 in order to analyze and optimize these measures. The registry documents the course of reanimated patients at the time points "first aid", "further management" and "long-term outcome" and can thus provide a complete presentation of the procedures and the quality of the outcome. Furthermore, important scientific questions can be answered from the database containing at present details of 24,000 resuscitations: for example, a score for benchmarking the outcome quality after out-of-hospital resuscitation (the so-called RACA score) has been developed. In addition, the major significance of percutaneous catheter interventions and active cooling after cardiac arrest has been demonstrated. In future, the platform of the German Resuscitation Registry will be further expanded to enable an interdisciplinary exchange of information as well as scientific research.


Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Primeiros Socorros/estatística & dados numéricos , Traumatismo Múltiplo/epidemiologia , Traumatismo Múltiplo/terapia , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Ressuscitação/estatística & dados numéricos , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Traumatismo Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco
2.
Crit Care ; 15(6): R282, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22112746

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Sudden cardiac arrest is one of the most frequent causes of death in the world. In highly qualified emergency medical service (EMS) systems, including well trained emergency physicians, spontaneous circulation may be restored in up to 53% of patients at least until admission to hospital. Compared with these highly qualified EMS systems, in other systems markedly lower success rates are observed. These data clearly show that there are considerable differences between EMS systems concerning treatment success following cardiac arrest and resuscitation, although in all systems international guidelines for resuscitation are used. This study investigates the impact of response time reliability (RTR) on cardio pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) incidence and resuscitation success using return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after cardiac arrest (RACA) score and data from seven German EMS systems participating in the German Resuscitation Registry. METHODS: Anonymized patient data after out of hospital cardiac arrest from 2006 to 2009 of seven EMS systems in Germany were analysed to socioeconomic factors (population, area, EMS unit hours), process quality (response time reliability, CPR incidence, special CPR measures, prehospital cooling), patient factors (age, gender, cause of cardiac arrest, bystander CPR). Endpoints were defined as ROSC, admission to hospital, 24 hour survival and hospital discharge rate. For statistical analyses, chi-square, odds-ratio and Bonferroni correction were used. RESULTS: 2,330 prehospital CPR from seven centres were included in this analysis. Incidence of sudden cardiac arrest differs from 36.0 to 65.1/100,000 inhabitants/year. We identified two EMS systems (RTR < 70%) reaching the patients within eight minutes in 62.0% and 65.6% while the other five EMS systems (RTR > 70%) achieved 70.4 up to 95.5%. EMS systems arriving relatively later at the patients side (RTR < 70%) less frequently initiate CPR and admit fewer patients alive to hospital (calculated per 100,000 inhabitants/year) (CPR incidence (1/100,000 inhabitants/year) RTR > 70% = 57.2 vs RTR < 70% = 36.1, OR = 1.586 (99% CI = 1.383 to 1.819); P < 0.01) (admitted to hospital with ROSC (1/100,000 inhabitants/year) RTR > 70% = 24.4 vs RTR < 70% = 15.6, OR = 1.57 (99% CI = 1.274 to 1.935); P < 0.01). Using ROSC rate and the multivariate RACA score to predict outcome, the two groups did not differ, but ROSC rates were higher than predicted in both groups (ROSC RTR > 70% = 46.6% vs RTR < 70% = 47.3%, OR = 0.971 (95% CI = 0.787 to 1.196); P = n.s.) (ROSC RACA RTR > 70% = 42.4% vs RTR < 70% = 39.5%, OR = 1.127 (95% CI = 0.911 to 1.395); P = n.s.). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that on the level of EMS systems, faster ones will more often initiate CPR and will increase number of patients admitted to hospital alive. Furthermore it is shown that with very different approaches, all adhering to and intensely training in the ERC guidelines 2005, superior and, according to international comparison, excellent success rates following resuscitation may be achieved.


Assuntos
Reanimação Cardiopulmonar/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Benchmarking , Reanimação Cardiopulmonar/normas , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Sistema de Registros , Distribuição por Sexo , Análise de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...