Comparison of Foraging Interactive D-prime and Angular Indication Measurement Stereo with different methods to assess stereopsis.

PURPOSE: Stereopsis is a critical visual function, however clinical stereotests are time-consuming, coarse in resolution, suffer memorization artifacts, poor repeatability, and low agreement with other tests. Foraging Interactive D-prime (FInD) Stereo and Angular Indication Measurement (AIM) Stereo were designed to address these problems. Here, their performance was compared with 2-Alternative-Forced-Choice (2-AFC) paradigms (FInD Stereo only) and clinical tests (Titmus and Randot) in 40 normally-sighted and 5 binocularly impaired participants (FInD Stereo only). METHODS: During FInD tasks, participants indicated which cells in three 4*4 charts of bandpass-filtered targets (1,2,4,8c/° conditions) contained depth, compared with 2-AFC and clinical tests. During the AIM task, participants reported the orientation of depth-defined bars in three 4*4 charts. Stereoscopic disparity was adaptively changed after each chart. Inter-test agreement, repeatability and duration were compared. RESULTS: Test duration was significantly longer for 2-AFC (mean = 317s;79s per condition) than FInD (216s,18s per chart), AIM (179s, 60s per chart), Titmus (66s) or RanDot (97s). Estimates of stereoacuity differed across tests and were higher by a factor of 1.1 for AIM and 1.3 for FInD. No effect of stimulus spatial frequency was found. Agreement among tests was generally low (R2 = 0.001 to 0.24) and was highest between FInD and 2-AFC (R2 = 0.24;p<0.01). Stereoacuity deficits were detected by all tests in binocularly impaired participants. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement among all tests was low. FInD and AIM inter-test agreement was comparable with other methods. FInD Stereo detected stereo deficits and may only require one condition to identify these deficits. AIM and FInD are response-adaptive, self-administrable methods that can estimate stereoacuity reliably within one minute.

How Do Most Young Moderate Hyperopes Avoid Strabismus?

Purpose: Uncorrected hyperopic children must overcome an apparent conflict between accommodation and vergence demands to focus and align their retinal images. This study tested hypotheses about simultaneous accommodation and vergence performance of young hyperopes to gain insight into ocular motor strategies used to maintain eye alignment. Methods: Simultaneous eccentric photorefraction and Purkinje image tracking were used to assess accommodative and vergence responses of 26 adult emmetropes (AE) and 94 children (0-13 years) viewing cartoons. Children were habitually uncorrected (CU) (spherical equivalent refractive error [SE] -0.5 to +4 D), corrected and aligned (CCA), or corrected with a history of refractive esotropia (CCS). Accommodative and vergence accuracy, dissociated heterophoria, and vergence/accommodation ratios in the absence of retinal disparity cues were measured for 33- and 80-cm viewing distances. Results: In binocular viewing, median accommodative lags for 33 cm were 1.0 D (AE), 1.33 D (CU), 1.25 D (CCA), and 1.0 D (CCS). Median exophorias at 80 and 33 cm were 1.2 and 4.5 pd (AE), 0.8 and 2.5 pd (CU), and 0 and 1.2 pd (CCA), respectively. Without disparity cues, most response vergence/accommodation ratios were between 1 and 2 meter angle/D (∼5-10 pd/D) (69% of AE, 44% of CU, 60% of CCA, and 50% of CCS). Conclusions: Despite apparent conflict in motor coupling, uncorrected hyperopes were typically exophoric and achieved adultlike accuracy of both vergence and accommodation simultaneously, indicating ability to compensate for conflicting demands rather than bias to accurate vergence while tolerating inaccurate accommodation. Large lags and esophoria are therefore atypical. This analysis provides normative guidelines for clinicians and a deeper mechanistic understanding of how hyperopes avoid strabismus.

Vergence and accommodation responses in the control of intermittent exotropia.

PURPOSE: Individuals with different types of intermittent exotropia (IXT) may use neurally coupled accommodation and vergence responses differently from those without exotropia to achieve eye alignment. This study examined the relationship between simultaneously recorded accommodation and vergence responses in children and young adults with a range of types of IXT while aligned and deviated. METHODS: Responses of 29 participants with IXT (4-31 years) and 24 age-matched controls were recorded using simultaneous eye-tracking and eccentric photorefraction while they watched a movie in binocular or monocular viewing at varying viewing distances. Gradient response AC/A ratios and fusional vergence ranges were also assessed. Eight participants had divergence or pseudo-divergence excess type IXT, 5 had convergence insufficiency and 16 had basic IXT. RESULTS: Control and IXT participants accommodated similarly both in monocular and binocular-aligned conditions to visual targets at 80 and 33 cm. When deviated in binocular viewing, most participants with IXT exhibited changes in accommodation <0.5D relative to alignment. Gradient response AC/A ratios were similar for control [0.56 MA/D (IQR: 0.51 MA/D)] and IXT participants [0.42 MA/D (0.54 MA/D); p  = 0.60]. IXT participants showed larger vergence to accommodation ratios with changes from distance to near fixation [1.19 MA/D (1.45 MA/D)] than control participants [0.78 MA/D (0.60 MA/D); p = 0.02], especially among IXT participants with divergence or pseudo-divergence excess. Participants with IXT exhibited typical fusional divergence ranges beyond their dissociated position [8.86 Δ (7.10 Δ)] and typical fusional convergence ranges from alignment [18 Δ (15.75 Δ)]. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that control of IXT is typically neither driven by accommodative convergence alone nor associated with over-accommodation secondary to fusional convergence efforts. These simultaneous measurements confirmed that proximal vergence contributed significantly to IXT control, particularly for divergence or pseudo-divergence excess type IXT. For IXT participants in this study, achieving eye alignment did not conflict with having clear vision.