Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Prz Gastroenterol ; 18(3): 313-319, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37937111

RESUMO

Introduction: Gastrointestinal-specific anxiety (GSA) is considered as an important factor in the course of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). GSA may be evaluated by the visceral sensitivity index (VSI). Aim: To translate original English version of the VSI into Ukrainian language (VSI-UA) and then to test its validity and reliability in patients with IBS. Material and methods: 108 patients of both sexes, aged 18-44 years, with IBS were assessed by the VSI-UA, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: depression (HADS-Dep) and anxiety (HADS-Anx). Reliability was checked by Cronbach's α and test-retest method with calculation of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Content validity was assessed by calculation of the content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (CVI). The construct validity was assessed by estimating Pearson`s correlation between VSI-UA, PHQ-9, BDI, HADS-Anx, and HADS-Dep. Results: Cronbach's α for VSI-UA was 0.84; the ICC between the first measurement and the one repeated 4 weeks after administration of VSI-UA was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87-0.95). The calculated CVR for each item of the VSI-UA was higher than the critical value of 0.56, and the CVI was 0.94. A moderate positive correlation was found between VSI-UA and PHQ-9 (r = 0.65), BDI (r = 0.69), HADS-Anx (r = 0.61), and HADS-Dep (r = 0.48); p < 0.05 in all correlations. Conclusions: VSI-UA is a reliable and valid tool for the assessment of GSA in Ukrainian-language patients with IBS, and it could be implemented in routine clinical practice to manage patients with IBS.

3.
Prz Gastroenterol ; 18(4): 442-448, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38572453

RESUMO

Introduction: It is assumed that up to 50% of patients with functional bowel disorders with diarrhoea may suffer from bile acid (BA) malabsorption, which is considered as an underrecognized cause of chronic diarrhoea.Aim: To evaluate the indicators of BA metabolism in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Material and methods: The study population included 28 healthy adults (control group), 108 patients with IBS with diarrhoea (IBS-D) and 37 with constipation (IBS-C), aged 18-44 years. All participants were assessed by symptoms questionnaires: VSI and FBDSI. High-performance liquid chromatography - mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) was used to measure serum and faecal BA (sBA and fBA). Ultra-performance liquid chromatography - mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS) was used to evaluate the relative activity (RA) of gut bacterial bile salt hydrolase (BSH). Results: Primary sBA in absolute and percentages, total fBA, and primary fBA in absolute and percentages were higher, and secondary sBA and fBA in percentages were lower in the IBS-D group compared to the control and IBS-C groups (p < 0.01). The RA of gut bacterial BSH was lower in IBS-D compared to the control and IBS-C groups (p < 0.01). RA of gut bacterial BSH, secondary sBA and fBA correlated negatively with abdominal pain, bloating, stool frequency, Bristol scale, VSI, and FBDSI (p < 0.05 in all). Total fBA, primary sBA, and fBA correlated positively with the same clinical parameters (p < 0.05 in all). Conclusions: IBS-D patients had altered parameters of BA metabolism that were associated with the severity of clinical symptoms, disease severity, visceral sensitivity, and stool appearance and frequency.

4.
ARYA Atheroscler ; 17(4): 1-10, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35685234

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Reduction of cardiovascular risk (CVR) is based on the correction of risk factors, especially dyslipidemia. Due to the limiting factors of conventional lipid-lowering medications, the investigation of alternative approaches is necessary. METHODS: The present open, comparative, randomized, and parallel investigation was conducted on 77 patients. Participants were of both sexes, 40-74 years-of-age, and had dyslipidemia. The participants were divided into 2 groups; the treatment group (n = 41) received a combination of Lactobacillus plantarum and simvastatin 20 mg once a day, and the control group (n = 36) received simvastatin 20 mg once a day. The trial included 5 visits; screening on the first 2, and treatment on the next 3 (on weeks 4, 8, and 12). On visits 1, 3, 4, and 5, the lipid profile was evaluated and CVR was calculated using 5 tools. RESULTS: The combination treatment led to a more pronounced decrease in total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoproteins (LDL) after 8 weeks (P = 0.002 and 0.016, respectively), that persisted after 12 weeks (P < 0.001 and 0.002, respectively). Reduction in TC and LDL by ³ 20% was observed more predominantly in the treatment group. A significant reduction was observed in CVR in the treatment group according to the Prospective Cardiovascular Münster (ýPROCAM) score (P = 0.004). Reduction of CVR by ³ 20% was mostly observed as a result of prescribing combination therapy according to the Framingham Risk Score ý(70.7%; P = 0.003), 2013 ACC/AHA ASCVD Risk Calculator ý(51.2%; P = 0.035), PROCAM (65.9%; P < 0.001), and WHO CVD risk chart (56.1%; P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Additional supplementation with Lactobacillus plantarum was more effective in the reduction of TC, LDL, and CVR according to PROCAM and the attainment of treatment goals regarding lipid profile and CVR levels.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...