Applying PET-CT for predicting the efficacy of SBRT to inoperable early-stage lung adenocarcinoma: A Brazilian case-series.

Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a treatment option for early-stage inoperable primary lung cancer. Here we report a thorough description of the prognostic value of pre-SBRT SUVmax for predicting the efficacy of SBRT in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: This is a retrospective study of consecutive cases of early-stage inoperable lung adenocarcinoma, staged with PET-CT, treated with SBRT between 2007 and 17. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were used to assess overall survival and compare time to event between those with PET-CT SUVmax values ≤ 5.0 and those > 5. Fisher's Exact tests and the Mann-Whitney U were used to compare the patient and clinical data of those with SUVmax≤5.0 and >5.0, and those with and without any failure. Findings: Amongst 50 lung carcinoma lesions, from 47 patients (34 (68%)-T1a or 5 (p = 0.112). In addition, 5 experienced a regional failure and 4 a distant failure. Higher PET-CT SUVmax values before SBRT were associated with an increased risk of any failure (36% versus 0%, p = 0.0040 on Fisher's Exact test) and faster time to event (p = 0.010, log rank test). Both acute and late toxicities profile were acceptable. Interpretation: Patients with early-stage inoperable lung adenocarcinoma present good clinical outcomes when treated with SBRT. We raised the hypothesis that the value of PET-CT SUVmax before SBRT may be an important predictive factor in disease control. Funding: None.

Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy for spinal metastases: experience at a single Brazilian institution.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the clinical outcomes of patients with spine metastases who underwent stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) as part of their treatment. SABR has arisen as a contemporary treatment option for spinal metastasis patients with good prognoses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 2010 and September 2018, Spinal SABR was performed in patients with metastatic disease in different settings: radical (SABR only), postoperative (after decompression and/or fixation surgery), and reirradiation. Local control (LC), pain control, overall survival (OS) and toxicities were reported. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients (corresponding to 96 treatments) with spine metastases were included. The median age was 59 years (range, 23-91). In most SA BR (82.3%, n = 79) was performed as the first local spine treatment, while in 12 settings (12.5%), fixation and/or decompression surgery was performed prior to SABR. Two-year overall survival rate was 74.1%, and median survival was 19 months. The LC rate at 2 years was 72.3%. With regard to pain control, among 67 patients presenting with pain before SA BR, 83.3% had a complete response, 12.1% had a partial response, and 4.6% had progression. Vertebral compression fractures occurred in 10 patients (11.7%), of which 5 cases occurred in the reirradiation setting. Radiculopathy and myelopathy were not observed. No grade III or IV toxicities were seen. CONCLUSION: This is the first study presenting a Brazilian experience with spinal SA BR, and the results confirm its feasibility and safety. SABR was shown to produce good local and pain control rates with low rates of adverse events.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for the Management of Spinal Metastases: A Review.

Importance: Rising cancer incidence combined with improvements in systemic and local therapies extending life expectancy are translating into more patients with spinal metastases. This makes the multidisciplinary management of spinal metastases and development of new therapies increasingly important. Spinal metastases may cause significant pain and reduced quality of life and lead to permanent neurological disability if compression of the spinal cord and/or nerve root occurs. Until recently, treatments for spinal metastases were not optimal and provided temporary local control and pain relief. Spinal stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is an effective approach associated with an improved therapeutic ratio, with evolving clinical application. Objective: To review the literature of spinal SABR for spinal metastases, discuss a multidisciplinary approach to appropriate patient selection and technical considerations, and summarize current efforts to combine spinal SABR with systemic therapies. Evidence Review: The MEDLINE database was searched to identify articles reporting on spinal SABR to September 30, 2018. Articles including clinical trials, prospective and retrospective studies, systematic reviews, and consensus recommendations were selected for relevance to multidisciplinary management of spinal metastases. Results: Fifty-nine unique publications with 5655 patients who underwent SABR for spinal metastases were included. Four comprehensive frameworks for patient selection were discussed. Spinal SABR was associated with 1-year local control rates of approximately 80% to 90% in the de novo setting, greater than 80% in the postoperative setting, and greater than 65% in the reirradiation setting. The most commonly discussed adverse effect was development of a vertebral compression fracture with variable rates, most commonly reported as approximately 10% to 15%. High-level data on the combination of SABR with modern therapies are still lacking. At present, 19 clinical trials are ongoing, mainly focusing on combined modality therapies, radiotherapy prescription dose, and oligometastic disease. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that spinal SABR may be an effective treatment option for well-selected patients with spinal metastases, achieving high rates of local tumor control with moderate rates of adverse effects. Optimal management should include review by a multidisciplinary care team.