Incidence of Pneumonitis Among Limited Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Exposed to Concurrent Chemoradiation: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

Severe pneumonitis (≥ grade 3 by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE]) is a toxicity associated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT), which is the standard first-line treatment for patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). We summarize and quantify the risk of pneumonitis in LS-SCLC patients receiving first-line CCRT. A systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases were searched to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, and non-randomized trials between 2014 to July 16, 2020. The primary outcome was incidence of pneumonitis. Thirteen studies were included in the SLR and 1539 pooled patients from 10 studies were included in the base-case meta-analysis. The pooled incidence of ≥ grade 3 pneumonitis was 3.28% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.52%-5.04%) in RCTs, and 6.34% (95% CI: 3.64%-9.04%) in non-RCTs. The pooled incidence risk of grade 5 (fatal) pneumonitis was 0.29% (95% CI: 0.00%-0.62%) in RCTs and 0.88% (95% CI: 0.02%-1.74%) in non-RCT. Results from sensitivity analyses were consistent with the base-case analysis. The results from this analysis show that the incidence of ≥ grade 3 pneumonitis in patients with LS-SCLC was 3.28% to 6.34%. The incidence of pneumonitis was higher in studies conducted in non-RCTs compared to RCTs. These results can be used to understand the safety, with regard to pneumonitis, of novel therapeutic agents when administered with CCRT to treat patients with LS-SCLC. To summarize and quantify the risk of pneumonitis in LS-SCLC patients receiving first-line CCRT, a systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines.

Comparative Efficacy of Dual and Single Initiation of Add-On Oral Antihyperglycemic Agents in Type 2 Diabetes Uncontrolled on Metformin Alone: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines recommend adding an oral antihyperglycemic agent (AHA) to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) uncontrolled on metformin. Recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that adding dual AHAs instead of a single AHA provided more effective glycemic control. However, the comparative efficacy of approved single and dual initiation strategies is unknown. Therefore, we conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of dual and single add-on oral AHAs in patients uncontrolled on metformin. METHODS: A systematic literature review of RCTs was conducted following Cochrane and ISPOR guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to November 19, 2019. Approved oral doses of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in single or dual initiation therapies were indirectly compared. Outcomes focused on efficacy and included mean change from baseline in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), weight, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure, and achieving HbA1c target < 7% at 24-26 weeks. Fixed and random effects models with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations were used. RESULTS: Of 1955 unique records screened, 25 RCTs (14,264 participants) were included. In patients uncontrolled on metformin, dual AHA added to metformin had statistically significant or a trend of greater reduction in HbA1c compared to single AHAs, with ertugliflozin + sitagliptin showing the greatest improvement. Statistically significant reductions in weight and SBP were observed with ertugliflozin + sitagliptin, ertugliflozin, or canagliflozin compared to single initiation DPP-4 inhibitors. CONCLUSION: For reduction of HbA1c, weight, and SBP in patients uncontrolled on metformin, add-on dual AHAs showed greater improvement compared to single AHAs. These findings can further inform the treatment of T2DM patients uncontrolled on metformin.