Double trouble: Unmasking two hook effects on Siemens Atellica® - Total PSA and total hCG assays.

The "hook effect" or "prozone phenomenon" occurs when the concentration of a particular analyte saturates the antibodies used in the test, resulting in falsely low or negative results despite the presence of high analyte concentrations. We report two recent cases of hook effect encountered with a widely used immunoassay analyzer, the Siemens Atellica® IM1600. The first case involves a patient with advanced metastatic prostate cancer whose total PSA (tPSA) concentration dropped dramatically from his last biological control. The second case concerns a pregnant woman whose total HCG (ThCG) levels were also subject to the hook effect and who was found to have a molar pregnancy. In both cases, a dilution step enabled to overcome this analytical concern and to obtain a correct result. In addition, a comparison of the sensitivity of different immunoassay analyzers to this phenomenon was carried out. To avoid this analytical error, an additional dilution step should automatically be performed when there is a clinical suspicion of elevated levels of tumor or hormone markers. Finally, the most affected manufacturers should adapt their assays, accordingly.

Biological variation of CA 15-3, CA 125 and HE 4 on lithium heparinate plasma in apparently healthy Caucasian volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: Tumor markers are well-known for being important tools in the support of diagnosis, monitoring of treatment efficacy and follow-up of cancers. CA 125, CA 15-3 and HE 4 have demonstrated potential efficacy in other clinical indications. The main objective was to evaluate the biological variation of these glycoproteins using two different immunoassays in an apparently healthy Caucasian population. METHODS: Nineteen healthy volunteers including 11 women and 8 men were sampled weekly for 5 consecutive weeks. Samples were analyzed in duplicate on Lumipulse® G600II (Fujirebio) and on the Cobas e602 (Roche Diagnostics) analyzers. After assessment of normality, exclusion of outliers and analysis of homogeneity of variance, analytical variation (CVA), within-subject biological variation (CVI) and between-subject biological variation (CVG) were determined using a nested ANOVA. RESULTS: CVA, CVI and CVG were determined on both analyzers and both genders. For CA 125, the CVA ranges from 1.0 to 3.4%, the CVI from 5.7 to 13.8% and the CVG from 32.2 to 42.9%. For CA 15-3, the CVA is between 1.1 and 3.4%, the CVI between 3.9 and 6.5% and the CVG between 43.7 and 196.9%. Lastly, HE 4 has CVA values between 1.4 and 2.4%, CVI between 5.1 and 10.5% and CVG between 7.1 and 12.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provided updated data on the biological variation of CA 125, HE 4 and CA 15-3. These data allow to improve the clinical interpretation and thus the management of the patient.

A colossal, enigmatic, and long-lasting high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T elevation.

This case describes the incidental finding of a massive and persistent elevation of troponin T in a patient with end-stage renal disease. This high troponin T value was not consistent with the patient's clinical condition and the laboratory was called in to investigate this discrepancy. After exclusion of analytical interference and discovery of a discordance between troponin T and troponin I, a clinical investigation including cardiac and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging was performed. Magnetic resonance imaging results allowed us to exclude a cardiac origin of troponin elevation but revealed a skeletal muscle pathology. This case constitutes the first description of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T elevation due to musculoskeletal pathology without cardiac involvement in a patient with end-stage renal disease.