RESUMO
PURPOSE: To explore the rehabilitation goals and evaluate goal attainment outcomes of people with severe acquired brain injury (ABI), and investigate the relationship between goal engagement and goal attainment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mixed-methods cohort study with twenty-nine adults with severe ABI in Australia. Demographic data, goal statements and pre-post program Goal Attainment Scale scores as well as Goal Engagement Scale scores were collected. Goals were coded using inductive content analysis and categorised by ICF component and domain. Goal attainment within ICF categories was described and compared using descriptive statistics. Pre-post program change in goal attainment was evaluated using Wilcoxon signed rank tests and correlations between goal engagement and attainment was explored using Spearman's (rho). RESULTS: 94% of 320 goals were categorised as ICF Activity and Participation. There was significant improvement in goal attainment between admission and discharge (z=-0.47, p < 0.01). There was no significant relationship between goal engagement and goal attainment however there was a positive association between engagement in goal setting at admission and discharge.Conclusions: This interdisciplinary, inpatient rehabilitation program underpinned by key-worker facilitated person-centred, role-based goal setting resulted in goal attainment in chosen goals, which were primarily activity and participation-focused.
Goal setting is a core rehabilitation practice and service delivery models that facilitate collaborative goal setting which engages patients, their significant others and health professionals as a team are necessary to enable person-centred care.Role-based goal setting effectively engaged patients with acquired brain injury and their families, facilitating goal setting and the formation of activity and participation-focused rehabilitation goals in this extended rehabilitation setting.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The cohort of people requiring in-hospital rehabilitation continues to age and experience more co-morbidities. How these changes impact the role of the rehabilitation nurse within rehabilitation teams is not clearly established. AIM: Describe how nurses work within rehabilitation teams in hospital-based rehabilitation units. DESIGN: Scoping review METHODS: Four datasets, Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science and EMBASE were searched. Studies were selected if they focused on nurses' roles in rehabilitation teams and were conducted in adult inpatient settings. Data were extracted and analysed by two researchers. An inductive descriptive approach was used for the analysis. Themes were finalised in a consensus meeting with the team. RESULTS: Twenty-four papers from Europe, United Kingdom, Canada and Australasia were found. Two themes were derived from the data: 'Nursing work is essential but rendered invisible' and 'Fluctuating teams and patient goals are momentarily stabilised through formal structures and processes'. Nurses were found to be working with three models of care, clinical, personal and rehabilitation within a culture focused only on rehabilitation. Nurses predominantly used relationship-based ad hoc communication strategies with other team members. Relationship-based interprofessional communication momentarily stabilises nurses' rehabilitation practice. CONCLUSION: Reframing rehabilitation nursing, to acknowledge the multiple models of care and communication mechanisms that are used in interprofessional teams is required. Building the team's capacity to work collaboratively in the fluctuating environment of rehabilitation requires attention to how intersubjectivity can be developed. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Scoping the role of nurses in rehabilitation care teams.
