Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Synapse ; 48(3): 131-7, 2003 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12645038

RESUMO

Exposure to methamphetamine (METH) during the preweanling period produces few, if any, neurotoxic effects (using criteria established in adult rats), yet it has substantial long-term effects on a variety of behavioral measures (e.g., locomotor activity, acoustic startle response, and spatial learning). The purpose of the present study was to examine the long-term changes in dopaminergic functioning brought about by early METH exposure. Rats were injected with METH (10 mg/kg) or saline four times daily on postnatal days (PD) 11-20 and housed undisturbed until PD 90, at which time they were killed and their dorsal striata (i.e., caudate-putamen) were removed and frozen for assay. The ability of early METH exposure to alter protein kinase A (PKA) activity and dopamine (DA) D(2)-like binding sites, as well as DA and DOPAC content, were assessed. Results showed that METH exposure on PD 11-20 caused long-term reductions in all of the dopaminergic markers assayed. METH-induced reductions in DA content and D(2)-like receptors were observed. Some sex differences were apparent, as the METH-induced decreases in PKA activity and DOPAC content were more evident in male rats. In conclusion, preweanling METH exposure caused changes in DA markers that were still detectable at PD 90; however the magnitude of many of these effects (e.g., the reductions in DA and DOPAC levels) was substantially less than typically reported for rats treated with METH in adulthood. The ability of METH to cause long-term reductions in PKA activity may partially account for some of behavioral deficits exhibited by rats exposed to METH prior to weaning.


Assuntos
Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/toxicidade , Corpo Estriado/efeitos dos fármacos , Metanfetamina/toxicidade , Ácido 3,4-Di-Hidroxifenilacético/metabolismo , Animais , Animais Recém-Nascidos , Sítios de Ligação/efeitos dos fármacos , Ligação Competitiva , Peso Corporal/efeitos dos fármacos , Corpo Estriado/metabolismo , Proteínas Quinases Dependentes de AMP Cíclico/efeitos dos fármacos , Proteínas Quinases Dependentes de AMP Cíclico/metabolismo , Dopamina/metabolismo , Feminino , Masculino , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Caracteres Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 159(4): 407-14, 2002 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11823893

RESUMO

RATIONALE: The role played by D(1)-like receptors in amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization has been examined using both the D(1)-like receptor antagonist, SCH 23390, and the D(1A) receptor knockout mouse (i.e. D(1A)-deficient mice). Studies using these two approaches have provided conflicting evidence about the importance of D(1)-like receptors for amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to determine: (a) whether D(1A)-deficient mice exhibit amphetamine-induced locomotor sensitization after 3 and 17 drug abstinence days, and (b) whether SCH 23390, which binds to both D(1A) and D(1B) receptor subtypes, blocks development of amphetamine sensitization in wild-type and D(1A)-deficient mice. METHODS: In the first experiment, adult wild-type and D(1A)-deficient mice were injected with amphetamine (0, 1, 2, 4, or 8 mg/kg, IP) for 7 consecutive days. In the second experiment, wild-type and D(1A)-deficient mice were pretreated with SCH 23390 (0, 0.15, or 0.5 mg/kg, IP) 30 min prior to being injected with amphetamine (0 or 8 mg/kg, IP). After each daily amphetamine injection, mice were placed in activity chambers where distance traveled (i.e. horizontal locomotor activity) was measured for 60 min. On the test days, which occurred after 3 or 17 drug abstinence days, mice were injected with 1 mg/kg amphetamine and locomotion was measured for 120 min. RESULTS: Both wild-type and D(1A)-deficient mice exhibited amphetamine-induced locomotor sensitization. Pretreatment with 0.5 mg/kg SCH 23390 blocked the development of locomotor sensitization in wild-type mice, but did not alter the sensitized responding of D(1A)-deficient mice. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that D(1)-like receptors are necessary for the development of amphetamine sensitization in wild-type mice, while neither the D(1A) nor D(1B) receptor subtypes are necessary for the amphetamine-induced locomotor sensitization of D(1A)-deficient mice. A possible explanation for these conflicting results is that D(1A)-deficient mice may have a compensatory mechanism (not involving D(1B) receptors) that allows them to exhibit amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization in the absence of the D(1A) receptor.


Assuntos
Anfetamina/farmacologia , Dopaminérgicos/farmacologia , Atividade Motora/efeitos dos fármacos , Receptores de Dopamina D1/deficiência , Animais , Benzazepinas/farmacologia , Antagonistas de Dopamina/farmacologia , Feminino , Masculino , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Camundongos Knockout , Atividade Motora/fisiologia , Receptores de Dopamina D1/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptores de Dopamina D1/genética , Receptores de Dopamina D1/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...