A randomized controlled study of acupuncture for pain relief during first trimester surgical termination of pregnancy performed under local analgesia.

BACKGROUND: Acupuncture reduces pain levels in many painful conditions. This study compared pain levels during surgical termination of first trimester pregnancy by suction evacuation (SE) under local analgesia with and without the use of acupuncture. METHODS: In all, 60 nulliparous women undergoing SE before 10 weeks of gestation were randomly assigned into one of the following three groups in a 1:1:1 ratio according to a computer-generated randomization list. In the control group, women received oral diazepam 5 mg and intramuscular (i.m.) injection of pethidine 30 and 15 min, respectively, prior to SE. In the acupuncture group, women received acupuncture 10 min before SE until the end of SE while oral diazepam 5 mg and i.m. injection of normal saline were given. In the combined group, women received acupuncture in addition to the drugs in the control group. Data from 52 participants were analysed. Pain scores during and after SE, post-operative side-effects and satisfaction levels were compared. RESULTS: The three groups had similar baseline characteristics. The median pain levels during SE differed significantly between the control, acupuncture, and combined groups (80, 50 and 66 mm, respectively, p = 0.03). Pain levels during SE in the acupuncture and combined groups were significantly lower than that of the control group. However, the anxiety scores did not differ between the three groups after SE (p = 0.86). CONCLUSION: Acupuncture can provide additional benefit in terms of pain relief in women undergoing first trimester termination of pregnancy by SE under local analgesia.

Use of music in reducing pain during outpatient hysteroscopy: Prospective randomized trial.

AIM: To evaluate the effect of music in reducing pain during outpatient hysteroscopy under no anesthesia. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial From June 2019 to December 2019 in Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital in Hong Kong. A total of 107 patients were randomized to music group (n = 54) or non-music group (n = 53). Music was played during outpatient hysteroscopy in the music group. Patients in the non-music group had the procedure done in the same setting without music. Primary outcome was the level of pain measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) score before and during the procedure. Secondary outcomes were vital parameters that reflect the level of pain including blood pressure and heart rate. RESULTS: Patients in the music group experienced significantly less pain during outpatient hysteroscopy (VAS score 4.54 ± 2.89 vs 5.88 ± 2.90; P = 0.02). The anticipated pain level was similar in both groups (VAS score 5.59 ± 2.27 vs 6.11 ± 2.43; P = 0.27). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in all the vital parameters. CONCLUSION: Listening to music during outpatient hysteroscopy under no anesthesia significantly reduces pain in a well-matched Chinese population. Music is easy to provide with low-cost equipment and manpower. We recommend the routine use of music during outpatient hysteroscopy to improve patient care.

Use of oral progestogen in women with threatened miscarriage in the first trimester: a randomized double-blind controlled trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Will use of oral progestogen in women with threatened miscarriage in the first trimester reduce the miscarriage rate when compared with placebo? SUMMARY ANSWER: Use of oral progestogen in women with threatened miscarriage in the first trimester did not reduce miscarriage before 20 weeks when compared with placebo. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Miscarriage is a common complication of pregnancy and occurs in 15-20% of clinically recognized pregnancies. Use of vaginal progestogens is not effective in reducing miscarriage but there is still no good evidence to support use of oral progestogen for the treatment of threatened miscarriage. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a randomized double-blind controlled trial. A total of 406 women presenting with threatened miscarriage in the first trimester were recruited from 30 March 2016 to May 2018. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Women attending Early Pregnancy Assessment Clinics because of vaginal bleeding during the first trimester were recruited and randomly assigned to use dydrogesterone 40 mg orally, followed by 10 mg orally three times a day or placebo until 12 completed weeks of gestation or 1 week after the bleeding stopped, whichever was later. The primary outcome was the miscarriage rate before 20 weeks of gestation. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The two groups of women had comparable age, BMI, number of previous miscarriages, gestation and ultrasound findings at presentation. The miscarriage rate before 20 weeks of gestation was similar in both groups, being 12.8% (26/203) in the progestogen group and 14.3% (29/203) in the placebo group (relative risk 0.897, 95% CI 0.548-1.467; P = 0.772). The live birth rate was 81.3% in the progestogen group versus 83.3% in the placebo group (P = 0.697). No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of obstetric outcomes and side effects. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The primary outcome was the miscarriage rate, rather than the live birth rate. Women were recruited from Early Pregnancy Assessment Clinics and those with heavy vaginal bleeding might be admitted into wards directly instead of attending Early Pregnancy Assessment Clinic. The severity of vaginal bleeding was subjectively graded by women themselves. The sample size was not adequate to demonstrate a smaller difference in the miscarriage rate between the progestogen and placebo groups. We did not exclude women with multiple pregnancy, which increased the risk of miscarriage although there was only one set of twin pregnancy in the placebo group. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Use of oral progestogen is not recommended in women with threatened miscarriage in the first trimester. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by the Health and Medical Research Fund, HKSAR (reference number 12132341). All authors declared no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov with an identifier NCT02128685. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 1 May 2014. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 30 March 2016.

Performance of ovarian response prediction index (ORPI) in predicting ovarian response and livebirth in the in-vitro fertilisation cycle using a standard stimulation with corifollitropin alpha in a GnRH antagonist protocol.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of ovarian response prediction index (ORPI) in predicting ovarian response and livebirth of women undergoing their first in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycle. This is a retrospective analysis of 285 women from 2013 to 2016. The outcome measures were area (AUC) under the receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves for prediction of excessive and poor response, livebirth in the fresh cycle and cumulative livebirth. The ORPI was significantly correlated with the oocyte number. For prediction of excessive response, AUC for ORPI was comparable to AMH and significantly higher than AFC and female age. At a cut-off of 0.42, ORPI has a sensitivity and specificity of 84% and 77% respectively for prediction of excessive response. For prediction of poor response, AUC for ORPI was significantly higher than AFC, AMH and female age. At a cut-off of 0.12, ORPI has a sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 89% respectively for prediction of poor response. For prediction of livebirth, AUCs of ORPI were not significantly different from AFC and female age. Therefore, ORPI is not a good predictor of livebirth. Its prediction of excessive and poor ovarian response is comparable to that of serum AMH.