Facial Trauma Operative Volume Demonstrates Consistent and Significant Yearly Periodicity.

PURPOSE: Facial trauma requiring operative care increases during the summer and fall months, which is colloquially referred to as trauma season. The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a quantifiable and statistically significant yearly periodicity of operative facial trauma volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To confirm the existence and quantify the magnitude of trauma season, we conducted a retrospective cohort study. The Plastic Surgery divisional billing database was queried for Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes related to acute facial trauma. The outcome variable is monthly CPT code volume and calendar month is the predictor. Monthly CPT volume was tabulated for 120 consecutive months. Raw data were plotted as a time series and transformed as a ratio to the moving average. Autocorrelation was applied to the transformed dataset to detect yearly periodicity. Multivariable modeling quantified the proportion of volume variability (R2) attributable to yearly periodicity. Subanalysis assessed presence and strength of periodicity in 4 age groups. Patient identifiers, demographic information, surgeon, and date of surgery were collected as covariates. RESULTS: One thousand six hundred fifty eight CPT codes obtained through Plastic Surgery billing records were included. Mean age at presentation was 32.5 ± 16.3 years (range = 85.05). Monthly trauma-related CPT volume was highest in June-September and lowest in December-February. Time series analysis revealed yearly oscillation, in addition to a growth trend. Autocorrelation revealed statistically significant positive and negative peaks at a lag of 12 and 6 months, respectively, confirming the presence of yearly periodicity. Multivariable linear modeling revealed R2 attributable to periodicity of 0.23 (P = .008). Periodicity was strongest in younger populations and weaker in older populations. R2 = 0.25 for ages 0-17, R2 = 0.18 for ages 18-44, R2 = 0.16 for ages 45-64, and R2 = 0.034 for ages ≥ 65. CONCLUSION: Operative facial trauma volumes peak in the summer and early fall and reach a winter nadir. This periodicity is statistically significant and accounts for 23% of overall trauma volume variability at our Level 1 trauma hospital. Younger patients drive the majority of this effect. Our findings have implications for operative block time and personnel allocation, in addition to expectation management over the course of the year.

Cutting Edge Craniomaxillofacial Trauma Reconstruction.

Facial injuries remain a significant source of morbidity in trauma. Due to the variety and unpredictable patterns of injuries associated with either blunt or ballistic mechanisms, advanced diagnostic imaging and complex management options are necessary. Multidisciplinary collaboration is essential to optimize the care of craniomaxillofacial trauma.

Timing of Cleft Palate Repair in Patients With and Without Robin Sequence.

BACKGROUND: This cohort study aimed to assess how age at repair affects outcomes in nonsyndromic patients with and without Robin Sequence using a national database of commercial healthcare claims. METHODS: Children under 4 years of age undergoing palatoplasty were identified in the IBM MarketScan Commercial Database based on ICD-9-CM and CPT procedure codes. They were divided into Robin and non-Robin cleft palate groups, and further divided by time of initial cleft palate repair: Robin Sequence into 2 groups: age ≤10 months or >10 months; non-Robin cleft palate into 3 groups: age ≤10 months, >10-14 months, or >14 months age. Time to cleft palate revision within each group was assessed using Cox proportional-hazard models. RESULTS: A total of 261 patients with Robin Sequence and 3046 with non-Robin cleft palate were identified. In patients with Robin, later repair was associated with decreased risk of secondary procedures compared with early repair (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.19, 95%CI 0.09-0.39, P < 0.001). In patients with non-Robin cleft palate, decreased risk of revision compared to early repair was associated both with repair at >10-14 months (adjusted HR 0.40, 95%CI 0.31-0.52, P < 0.001) and > 14 months (adjusted HR 0.71, 95%CI 0.57-0.88, P = 0.002). Adjusting for timing of repair, patients with non-Robin cleft palate were at significantly increased risk of secondary procedure if diagnosed with failure to thrive or anemia in the 30 days prior to palatoplasty. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with and without Robin sequence, cleft palate repair at or before 10 months of age was associated with higher risk for secondary procedures.

Algorithm for Management of Mandibular Condylar Base Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests that open reduction and internal fixation of condylar base fractures in adults results in improved outcomes in regard to interincisal opening, jaw movement, pain, and malocclusion. However, most of the condylar fractures are managed by maxillomandibular fixation alone due to the need for specialized training and equipment. Our aim was to present an algorithm for condylar base fractures to simplify surgical management. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients (n = 22) with condylar base fractures treated from 2016 to 2020. Patients who presented with operative fractures that require open treatment underwent 1 of 2 different techniques depending on the fracture type: a preauricular approach with a transoral approach if the condyle was dislocated (n = 2) or a transoral only approach (n = 20) in nondislocated cases. Operative time, occlusion, range of motion, and postoperative complications were assessed. RESULTS: Condylar base fractures were combined with other mandibular fractures in 16 of 22 patients. Patients with condylar dislocation were managed with a preauricular approach with a secondary transoral incision (n = 2, median 147 minutes). Those without dislocation were treated with a transoral approach (n = 20, median 159 minutes). Most patients were restored to their preoperative occlusion without long-term complications. CONCLUSIONS: We present a simplified algorithm for treating condylar base fractures. Our case series suggests that reduction in operative time and clinical success can be achieved with open reduction and internal fixation using a transoral approach alone or in combination with a preauricular approach for dislocated fractures.

School-Aged Anthropometric Outcomes After Endoscopic or Open Repair of Metopic Synostosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Metopic craniosynostosis can be treated by fronto-orbital advancement or endoscopic strip craniectomy with postoperative helmeting. Infants younger than 6 months of age are eligible for the endoscopic repair. One-year postoperative anthropometric outcomes have been shown to be equivalent, with significantly less morbidity after endoscopic treatment. The authors hypothesized that both repairs would yield equivalent anthropometric outcomes at 5-years postoperative. METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review of 31 consecutive nonsyndromic patients with isolated metopic craniosynostosis treated with either endoscopic or open correction. The primary anthropometric outcomes were frontal width, interfrontal divergence angle, the Whitaker classification, and the presence of lateral frontal retrusion. Peri-operative variables included estimated blood loss, rates of blood transfusion, length of stay, and operating time. RESULTS: There was a significantly lower rate of lateral frontal retrusion in the endoscopic group. No statistically significant differences were found in the other 3 anthropometric outcomes at 5-years postoperative. The endoscopic group was younger at the time of surgery and had improved peri-operative outcomes related to operating time, hospital stay and blood loss. Both groups had low complication and reoperation rates. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of school-aged children with isolated metopic craniosynostosis, patients who underwent endoscopic repair had superior or equivalent outcomes on all 4 primary anthropometric measures compared with those who underwent open repair. Endoscopic repair was associated with significantly faster recovery and decreased morbidity. Endoscopic repair should be considered in patients diagnosed with metopic craniosynostosis before 6 months of age.

Partial Suture Fusion in Nonsyndromic Single-Suture Craniosynostosis.

INTRODUCTION: Partial synostosis of cranial sutures has been shown to have clinical and diagnostic significance. However, there is limited published information about how suture fusion progresses over time. In this study, we evaluate patients with nonsyndromic single-suture synostosis. We aim to define the incidence of partial versus complete suture fusion and whether a correlation exists between the degree of suture fusion and age. METHODS: Two hundred fifty-four patients with nonsyndromic single-suture synostosis were evaluated. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were rendered in 3-dimensions, all sutures were visualized and assessed for patency or fusion, and length of fusion was measured. Findings were grouped according to suture type (sagittal, coronal, metopic, or lambdoid), the degree of fusion (full, >50%, or <50%), and patient age at time of CT scan (0-90, 91-180, 181-360, or >360 days). Data were analyzed to correlate patient age versus the degree of suture fusion. RESULTS: For all patients, 72% had complete and 28% had partial synostosis. Ratios of full to partial fusion for each suture type were as follows: sagittal 97:36, coronal 35:22, metopic 46:4, and lambdoid 4:10. The sagittal, coronal, and metopic groups demonstrated greater probabilities of complete suture fusion as patient age increases (P = .021, P < .001, P = .001, respectively). This trend was also noted when all sutures were considered together by age-group (P < .001). CONCLUSION: We note a partial suture fusion rate of 28.3%. Our analysis shows a correlation between the extent of suture synostosis and patient age. Finally, we demonstrate that different sutures display different patterns of partial and complete fusion.

Evaluation of Direct Surgical Remodeling of Frontal Bossing in Patients With Sagittal Synostosis.

BACKGROUND: The need for surgical correction of frontal bossing in patients with sagittal synostosis is currently debated. The authors retrospectively analyzed frontal bossing in patients with isolated, nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis who underwent calvarial remodeling with and without frontal craniotomy and compared with control subjects. METHODS: The authors analyzed computed tomography (CT) scans of patients with sagittal synostosis <9 months of age (6.2 ±â€Š1.6 months) who underwent modified-pi procedure either with frontal craniotomy (FC, n = 15) or without frontal craniotomy (NFC, n = 10). Only patients treated with both pre-operative and 1-year post-operative CT scans were included. Non-synostotic age-matched control scans were also analyzed. Cephalic index (CI), 3 previously validated measures of frontal bossing (bossing angle, horizontal bossing ratio, and vertical bossing ratio), and pre-nasion volume ratio were obtained. Additionally, three-dimensional photographs of 10 FC patients were evaluated for frontal bossing between 1 and 8 years post-operatively. RESULTS: Pre-operatively, no significant differences were found between the 2 groups (.064

One hundred consecutive endoscopic repairs of sagittal craniosynostosis: an evolution in care.

OBJECTIVE Endoscope-assisted repair of sagittal craniosynostosis was adopted at St. Louis Children's Hospital in 2006. This study examines the first 100 cases and reviews the outcomes and evolution of patient care protocols at our institution. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective chart review of the first 100 consecutive endoscopic repairs of sagittal craniosynostosis between 2006 and 2014. The data associated with length of hospital stay, blood loss, transfusion rates, operative times, cephalic indices (CIs), complications, and cranial remolding orthosis were reviewed. Measurements were taken from available preoperative and 1-year postoperative 3D reconstructed CT scans. RESULTS The patients' mean age at surgery was 3.3 ± 1.1 months. Of the 100 patients, 30 were female and 70 were male. The following perioperative data were noted. The mean operative time (± SD) was 77.1 ± 22.2 minutes, the mean estimated blood loss was 34.0 ± 34.8 ml, and the mean length of stay was 1.1 ± 0.4 days; 9% of patients required transfusions; and the mean pre- and postoperative CI values were 69.1 ± 3.8 and 77.7 ± 4.2, respectively. Conversion to open technique was required in 1 case due to presence of a large emissary vein that was difficult to control endoscopically. The mean duration of helmet therapy was 8.0 ± 2.9 months. Parietal osteotomies were eventually excluded from the procedure. CONCLUSIONS The clinical outcomes and improvements in CI seen in our population are similar to those seen at other high-volume centers. Since the inception of endoscope-assisted repair at our institution, the patient care protocol has undergone several significant changes. We have been able to remove less cranium using our "narrow-vertex" suturectomy technique without affecting patient safety or outcome. Patient compliance with helmet therapy and collaborative care with the orthotists remain the most essential aspects of a successful outcome.

Anthropometric Outcome Measures in Patients With Metopic Craniosynostosis.

PURPOSE: Treatment of metopic craniosynostosis is performed by either fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) or endoscopic-assisted techniques. Interfrontal angle (IFA) is a validated measure of trigonocephaly, but requires a computed tomography scan. The most common direct measure to assess surgical outcome in patients with trigonocephaly is frontal width (ft-ft). The aim of this study is to determine if frontal width correlates with IFA and successful surgical correction 1 year after treatment. A review of current morphologic assessment techniques is also provided. METHODS: Three-dimensional computed tomography scans (preoperative and 1 year postoperative) of patients who underwent FOA (n = 13) or endoscopic (n = 13) treatment of metopic craniosynostosis were reviewed. Age-matched scans of unaffected patients served as controls. Frontal width was measured by a straight line between the bilateral frontotemporal points. Measurements were performed by 2 experienced observers and compared to IFA. RESULTS: Mean frontal width at preoperative scan for endoscopic and open patients was 55 ±â€Š0.6 and 64 ±â€Š0.7 mm, respectively (Z-score 1.6 and -3.7). Mean frontal width at postoperative scan for endoscopic and open patients was 80 ±â€Š0.4 and 81 ±â€Š0.7 mm (Z-score 0.0 for both groups). Frontal width for endoscopic correction significantly correlated with IFA (r = 0.536, P = 0.005), as well as for the open patients (r = 0.704, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Frontal width normalizes 1 year after operation, regardless of technique. Advantage of frontal width is that it can be measured in the clinic using a spreading vernier caliper. It correlates well with IFA and can be used as a metric for morphologic outcome.

Adult Quality of Life Post Cleft Palate Repair: A Comparison of Two Techniques.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In 1989, the Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal published the first randomized prospective cleft surgery study, comparing the Kriens intravelar veloplasty (IVV) with a non-IVV 2-flap repair. Results in that and follow-up publications yielded no difference between the 2 groups for need for secondary velopharyngeal management. The subjects have now reached adulthood. This study was designed to ask: Is there any difference between the groups in the outcomes that multidisciplinary team care addresses: speech intelligibility, facial growth, breathing while awake and asleep, attainment of education, and long-term socioeconomic status? METHODS: Enrollees from the original published study were invited to participate in a survey. Subjects responded to questions about speech therapy and speech satisfaction, additional surgery, breathing patterns, sleep quality/sleep disorder, and dental occlusion. Demographic information, information on education level, profession, and socio-economic status were queried. Student t test and Fisher exact test were used to compare results. RESULTS: Forty-two of the original 200 patients (20 Kriens IVV and 19 non-IVV) chose to participate. Average age at survey was 25 ±â€Š3 years. Analysis yielded no difference between the 2 respondent groups for need for secondary velopharyngeal management. There were no differences in speech outcome and satisfaction (8 questions, 0.30 < P < 0.97), sleep concerns (3 questions, 0.16 < P < 0.39), and dental occlusion (P = 0.69). Equivalent proportions of the 2 groups had been in speech therapy (P = 0.22). There was no difference in education attainment of the 2 groups (P = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: The original randomized prospective trial suggested that there was no difference between the 2 surgery types in need for secondary velopharyngeal management. This long-term survey study on the same group of patients suggests that in young adulthood, the 2 groups have similar outcomes in terms of education, career choice, speech satisfaction, dental occlusion, and sleep disorder.

Single Z-Plasty Versus Double-Opposing Z-Plasty: A Cadaveric Study of Palatal Lengthening.

OBJECTIVE: The double-opposing Z-plasty is an effective method of repairing the cleft palate due to its reorientation of the palatal musculature and lengthening of the soft palate. A technique for lengthening the palate with a single oral Z-plasty has also been described. The authors hypothesize that these 2 techniques have equivalent effects on palate length. METHODS: A cadaver study was performed. Ten fresh adult cadaver heads were used.All palates were divided in the midline. In 5 specimens, a modified double-opposing Z-plasty technique was used; 5 other specimens underwent an oral Z-plasty with a straight-line repair of the nasal mucosa. In both groups, the levator veli palatini muscles were separately dissected and reapproximated with an intravelar veloplasty. The velar length, defined in this study as the distance from the posterior nasal spine to the tip of uvula, was measured before and after the surgical procedure. RESULTS: The double-opposing Z-plasty produced a mean increase of 1.0 ±â€Š0.6 cm in velar length (P = 0.023). The single Z-plasty repair resulted in a mean gain of 1.1 ±â€Š0.3 cm (P = 0.001). There was no difference in change in palate length between the 2 procedures (P = 0.941), and no difference in the percentage of soft palate lengthening (24% vs 29%, respectively; P = 0.565). CONCLUSIONS: A single oral Z -plasty provides palatal lengthening equivalent to that of a double-opposing Z-plasty procedure.

Improving Results in Closed Nasal Reduction: A Protocol for Reducing Secondary Deformity.

BACKGROUND: Nasal fractures are the most common facial fracture. Improper reduction is a common occurrence, resulting in a residual deformity that requires secondary surgery. A treatment protocol for nasal fracture management is presented with the aim of reducing secondary deformities requiring corrective surgery. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of all closed nasal reductions performed by a single surgeon between 2006 and 2015 was conducted. Patient age, sex, presence of secondary deformity, and need for a correctional operation were recorded. Clinical records were analyzed for evidence of postoperative deformity and need for subsequent manipulation or surgery. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients with nasal bone fractures who underwent closed nasal reduction were identified. The mean age of patients was 24.9 years. The male-to-female ratio was 2.2:1. Postoperative deformity was reported in 14 patients (15.6 percent). Four of the 90 patients (4.4 percent) were found to have avulsion of their upper lateral cartilage from the nasal bone. Nine of the 14 subjects (64.3 percent) presenting with secondary deformity were managed with external manipulation, avoiding a secondary operation. Five patients (5.5 percent) from the original cohort of 90 underwent revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: By using the described protocol to treat nasal fractures, we have seen a low rate of postreduction deformity and a small percentage of need for secondary operation. The overall success rate of closed nasal reduction with postoperative manipulation (when necessary) was identified to be 94.5 percent. Using this protocol, surgeons may see a decrease in secondary deformities following closed nasal reduction procedures. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Comparison of Resorbable Plating Systems: Complications During Degradation.

INTRODUCTION: Several bioresorbable plating systems have become standard in pediatric craniosynostosis reconstruction. A comparison of these systems is needed to aid surgeons in the preoperative planning process. The authors aim to evaluate 1 institution's experience using Resorb-X by KLS Martin and Delta Resorbable Fixation System by Stryker (Stryker Craniomaxillofacial, Kalamazoo, MI). METHODS: A sample of patients with single-suture nonsyndromic craniosynostosis treated at St Louis Children's Hospital between 2007 and 2014 using either Resorb-X or Delta bioresorbable plating systems were reviewed. Only patients with preoperative, immediate, and long-term 3-dimensional photographic images or computed tomography scans were included. A comparison of plating system outcomes was performed to determine the need for clinic and emergency room visits, imaging obtained, and incidence of subsequent surgical procedures due to complications. RESULTS: Forty-six patients (24 Resorb-X and 22 Delta) underwent open repair with bioabsorbable plating for single suture craniosynostosis. The mean age at each imaging time point was similar between the 2 plating systems (P > 0.717). Deformity-specific measures for sagittal (cranial index), metopic (interfrontotemporale), and unicoronal (frontal asymmetry) synostosis were equivalent between the systems at all time points (0.05 < P < 0.904). A single Delta patient developed bilateral scalp cellulitis and abscesses and subsequently required operative intervention and antibiotics. CONCLUSION: Bioabsorbable plating for craniosynostosis in children is effective and has low morbidity. In our experience, the authors did not find a difference between the outcomes and safety profiles between Resorb-X and Delta.

Fenestration of Solid Orbital Implants: Reducing Retrobulbar Hematoma Rate.

PURPOSE: Retrobulbar hematoma is an uncommon but potentially devastating complication following repair of orbital fractures. Since 2007, the senior author routinely fenestrates the solid porous polyethylene implants commonly used for orbital reconstruction. The perforated implant may facilitate drainage of postoperative bleeding and may potentially reduce the risk of retrobulbar hematoma. This study examines the rates of retrobulbar hematoma in patients who underwent orbital fracture reconstruction with placement of fenestrated or nonfenestrated implants. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients with orbital fracture reconstruction using an implant performed by the senior author between 2006 and 2016 was conducted. Data collected included age, sex, implant type, and presence of retrobulbar hematoma. RESULTS: One hundred four patients were included in the study. One patient who was treated with a nonperforated implant was found to have a postoperative retrobulbar hematoma. The retrobulbar hematoma did not cause visual changes or increased intraocular pressure, so the patient was observed and did not undergo any surgical intervention. The hematoma resolved spontaneously without further sequela. No patients with fenestrated implants had a retrobulbar hematoma. CONCLUSIONS: Fenestration of solid implants used in orbital floor reconstruction is simple and easy to perform, and may reduce the incidence of postoperative retrobulbar hematoma.

A Comparison of the Need for Speech Therapy After 2 Palatal Repair Techniques.

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of the levator musculature during cleft palate repair has been suggested to be important in long-term speech outcomes. In this study, we compare the need for postoperative speech therapy between 2 intravelar veloplasty techniques. METHODS: Chart review was performed for patients with nonsyndromic cleft palate who underwent either primary Kriens or overlapping intravelar veloplasty before 18 months of age. All subjects completed a follow-up visit at approximately 3 years of age. Data obtained included documentation of ongoing or recommended speech therapy at age 3 years and reasons for speech therapy, which were categorized as cleft-related and non-cleft-related by a speech-language pathologist. RESULTS: One surgeon performed all Kriens procedures (n = 81), and the senior author performed all overlapping procedures (n = 25). Mean age at surgery (Kriens = 13.5 ± 1.4 months; overlapping = 13.1 ± 1.5 months; P = 0.188) and age at 3-year follow-up (Kriens = 3.0 ± 0.5 years; overlapping = 2.8 ± 0.5 years; P = 0.148) were equivalent in both groups. Cleft severity by Veau classification (P = 0.626), prepalatoplasty pure tone averages, (P = 0.237), pure tone averages at 3-year follow-up (P = 0.636), and incidence of prematurity (P = 0.190) were also similar between the 2 groups. At 3 years of age, significantly fewer overlapping intravelar veloplasty patients required cleft-related speech therapy (Kriens = 47%; overlapping = 20%; P = 0.015). The proportions of patients requiring non-cleft-related speech therapy were equivalent (P = 0.906). CONCLUSIONS: At 3 years of age, patients who received overlapping intravelar veloplasty were significantly less likely to need cleft-related speech therapy compared with patients who received Kriens intravelar veloplasty. Cleft severity, hearing loss, and prematurity at birth did not appear to explain the difference found in need for speech therapy.

Current Management of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures: A Multidisciplinary Survey and Literature Review.

Despite the prevalence of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures, there is no consensus regarding the best approach to management. The aim of this study is to determine differences in ZMC fracture treatment among various surgical specialties. A survey was conducted regarding treatment of patients with different ZMC fractures that included a minimally displaced fracture (Case 1), a displaced fracture without diplopia (Case 2), a displaced fracture with diplopia (Case 3), and a complex comminuted fracture (Case 4). The survey was distributed to members of plastic surgery, oral maxillofacial surgery, and otolaryngology societies. The rates of surgical treatment, exploration of the orbital floor, and plating three or more buttresses were analyzed among the specialties. A total of 173 surgeons participated (46 plastic and reconstructive surgeons, 25 oral and maxillofacial surgeons, and 102 otolaryngologists). In Case 1, a significantly higher percentage of plastic surgeons recommend an operation (p < 0.01) compared with other specialties. More than 90% of surgeons would perform an operation on Case 2. Plastic surgeons explored the orbital floor (p < 0.01) and also fixated three or more buttresses more frequently (p < 0.01). More than 93% of surgeons would operate on Case 3, with plastic surgeons having the greatest proportion who fixed three or more buttresses (p < 0.01). In Case 4, there was no difference in treatment patterns between specialties. Across the specialties, more fixation was placed by surgeons with fewer years in practice (<10 years). Conclusion There is no consensus on standard treatment of ZMC fractures, as made evident by the survey. Significant variability in fracture type warrants an individualized approach to management. A thorough review on ZMC fracture management is provided.

Endoscope-assisted management of sagittal synostosis: wide vertex suturectomy and barrel stave osteotomies versus narrow vertex suturectomy.

OBJECTIVE Endoscope-assisted methods for treatment of craniosynostosis have reported benefits over open calvarial vault reconstruction. In this paper, the authors evaluated 2 methods for endoscope-assisted correction of sagittal synostosis: wide vertex suturectomy and barrel stave osteotomies (WVS+BSO) and narrow vertex suturectomy (NVS). METHODS The authors evaluated patients with nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis treated with either wide vertex suturectomy (4-6 cm) and barrel stave osteotomies (WVS+BSO) or narrow vertex suturectomy (NVS) (approximately 2 cm) between October 2006 and July 2013. Prospectively collected data included patient age, sex, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative hemoglobin level, number of transfusions, complications, and cephalic index. Fourteen patients in the NVS group were age matched to 14 patients in the WVS+BSO group. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and Student t-tests were used to compare prospectively obtained data from the WVS+BSO group with the NVS group in a series of univariate analyses. RESULTS The mean age at surgery was 3.9 months for WVS+BSO and 3.8 months for NVS. The mean operative time for patients undergoing NVS was 59.0 minutes, significantly less than the 83.4-minute operative time for patients undergoing WVS+BSO (p < 0.05). The differences in mean EBL (NVS: 25.4 ml; WVS+BSO: 27.5 ml), mean postoperative hemoglobin level (NVS: 8.6 g/dl; WVS+BSO: 8.0 g/dl), mean preoperative cephalic index (NVS: 69.9; WVS+BSO: 68.2), and mean cephalic index at 1 year of age (NVS: 78.1; WVS+BSO: 77.2) were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS The NVS and WVS+BSO produced nearly identical clinical results, as cephalic index at 1 year of age was similar between the 2 approaches. However, the NVS required fewer procedural steps and significantly less operative time than the WVS+BSO. The NVS group obtained the final cephalic index in a similar amount of time postoperatively as the WVS+BSO group. Complications, transfusion rates, and EBL were not different between the 2 techniques.

Evidence for Use of Frontozygomaticus and Contralateral Eurion as Hand-Caliper Landmarks for Assessment of Deformational Plagiocephaly.

The severity of deformational plagiocephaly is frequently measured by cranial vault asymmetry (CVA). Cranial vault asymmetry is a simple linear proxy for the three-dimensional deformity. Different anthropometric landmarks have been suggested as the endpoints of the cross-cranial diagonals that determine CVA. One promising albeit counterintuitive set of digital landmarks is the frontozygomaticus and contralateral eurion. The validity of nondigital caliper measures associated with the diagonals defined by the frontozygomaticus and contralateral eurions has not been tested. In this study, the authors compare caliper measures against stereophotogrammetric measures that have been documented to correlate strongly with overall skull asymmetry.Cranial vault asymmetry was assessed by direct anthropometry with 2 different measures on 36 patients. Frontozygomaticus and contralateral eurion (fz-eu) and 30 degrees off the anteroposterior diameter (30offAP). Three-dimensional photographs were obtained and also used to quantify CVA in these subjects; digital measures of fz-eu and an overall measure of plagiocephaly (Global) were calculated. Global and 30offAP obtained at 31 patient visits in 2011 were also included.The measure best-correlated with overall Global asymmetry was digital fz-eu (R = 0.80). Caliper fz-eu was not strongly correlated with Global asymmetry (R = 0.27) or with digital fz-eu (R = 0.34). Differences between the digital and caliper fz-eu measures were 5 ±â€Š4 mm (mean ±â€Šst. dev.). Differences between the caliper fz-eu and 30offAP measures were 6 ±â€Š4 mm.Digital fz-eu shows an excellent correlation to Global asymmetry. However, attempts to replicate this result in the clinical setting by measuring fz-eu with calipers were unsuccessful.

Five surgical maneuvers on nasal mucosa movement in cleft palate repair: A cadaver study.

INTRODUCTION: This biomechanical study aims to characterize the nasal mucosa during palatoplasty, thereby describing the soft tissue attachments at different zones and quantifying movement following their release. METHODS: Palatal nasal mucosa was exposed and divided in the midline in 10 adult cadaver heads. Five consecutive maneuvers were performed: (1) elevation of nasal mucosa off the maxilla, (2) dissection of nasal mucosa from soft palate musculature, (3) separation of nasal mucosa from palatine aponeurosis, (4) release of mucosa at the pterygopalatine junction, and (5) mobilization of vomer flaps. The mucosal movements across the midline at the midpalate (MP) and posterior nasal spine (PNS) following each maneuver were measured. RESULTS: At the MP, maneuvers 1-4 cumulatively provided 3.8 mm (36.9%), 4.9 mm (47.6%), 6.1 mm (59.2%), and 10.3 mm, respectively. Vomer flap (10.5 mm) elevation led to mobility equivalent to that of maneuvers 1-4 (p = 0.72). At the PNS, cumulative measurements after maneuvers 1-4 were 1.3 mm (10%), 2.4 mm (18.6%), 5.7 mm (44.2%), and 12.9 mm. Here, vomer flaps (6.5 mm) provided less movement (p < 0.001). Maneuver 4 yielded the greatest amount of movement of the lateral nasal mucosa at both MP (4.2 mm, 40.8%) and PNS (7.2 mm, 55.8%). CONCLUSION: At the MP, complete release of the lateral nasal mucosa achieves as much movement as the vomer flap. At the hard-soft palate junction, the maneuvers progressively add to the movement of the lateral nasal mucosa. The most powerful step is release of attachments along the posterior aspect of the medial pterygoid.