Prediction of the Proximal Humerus Morphology Based on a Statistical Shape Model with Two Parameters: Comparison to Contralateral Registration Method.

(1) Background: Complex proximal humerus fractures often result in complications following surgical treatment. A better understanding of the full 3D displacement would provide insight into the fracture morphology. Repositioning of fracture elements is often conducted by using the contralateral side as a reconstruction template. However, this requires healthy contralateral anatomy. The purpose of this study was to create a Statistical Shape Model (SSM) and compare its effectiveness to the contralateral registration method for the prediction of the humeral proximal segment; (2) Methods: An SSM was created from 137 healthy humeri. A prediction for the proximal segment of the left humeri from eight healthy patients was made by combining the SSM with parameters. The predicted proximal segment was compared to the left proximal segment of the patients. Their left humerus was also compared to the contralateral (right) humerus; (3) Results: Eight modes explained 95% of the variation. Most deviations of the SSM prediction and the contralateral registration method were below the clinically relevant 2 mm distance threshold.; (4) Conclusions: An SSM combined with parameters is a suitable method to predict the proximal humeral segment when the contralateral CT scan is unavailable or the contralateral humerus is unhealthy, provided that the fracture pattern allows measurements of these parameters.

Current clinical practice of knee osteotomy in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Realignment osteotomies is gaining popularity amongst Dutch orthopaedic surgeons. Exact numbers and used standards in clinical practice concerning osteotomies are unknown due to the absence of a national registry. The aim of this study was to investigate the national statistics of performed osteotomies, utilized clinical workups, surgical techniques, and post-operative rehabilitation standards in the Netherlands. METHOD: Dutch orthopaedic surgeons, all members of the Dutch Knee Society, received a web-based survey between January and March 2021. This electronic survey contained 36 questions, subdivided into: general surgeon-related information, number of performed osteotomies, inclusion of patients, clinical workup, surgical techniques, and post-operative management. RESULTS: 86 orthopaedic surgeons filled in the questionnaire, of whom 60 perform realignment osteotomies around the knee. All the 60 responders (100%) perform high tibial osteotomies and 63.3% additionally perform distal femoral osteotomies, while 30% perform double level osteotomies. Discrepancies in surgical standards were reported regarding to inclusion criteria, clinical workup, surgical techniques, and post-operative strategies. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this study got more insight in knee osteotomy clinical practices as applied by Dutch orthopaedic surgeons. However, there are still important discrepancies which pleads for more standardization based on available evidence. A (inter)national knee osteotomy registry, and even more so, a (inter)national registry for joint preserving surgeries could be helpful to achieve more standardization and treatment insights. Such a registry could improve all aspects of osteotomies and its combinations with other joint-preserving interventions towards evidence for personalised treatments.

Visual Inspection for Lower Limb Malalignment Diagnosis Is Unreliable.

OBJECTIVE: Visual inspection of the lower limb is often part of standard clinical practice during a physical examination at the outpatient clinic. This study aims to investigate how reliable visual inspections are in terms of detecting lower limb malalignments without additional tools and physical examinations. DESIGN: This study enrolled 50 patients. Each patient underwent a whole leg radiograph (WLR); in addition, a standardized digital photograph was taken of the lower limbs. Four persons (different experience levels) visually rated the digital photograph twice (unaware of the hip knee angle [HKA] on the WLR) and placed them in the category: severe valgus (>5°); moderate valgus (2°-5°); neutral, moderate varus (2°-5°); and severe varus (>5°). Visual ratings were compared with the measured HKA on WLRs for correlation using Spearman's rho. Linear ordinal regression models with significance when P < 0.05 were used to test whether body mass index (BMI), age, gender, and HKA were possible risk factors for incorrect visual HKA assessment. RESULTS: Spearman's rho between the visual assessment and measured HKA on the WLR was moderate with 0.478 (P < 0.01). Women had an increased odds ratio of 3.7 (P = 0.001) for incorrect visual assessment. Higher HKA also increased the odds ratio for erroneous visual assessment with 1.4 (P = 0.003). BMI and age did not significantly increase the odds of erroneous visual leg axis assessments in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Visual assessment of the lower limb alignment does not provide clinically relevant information. Lower limb malalignment diagnoses cannot be performed using only a visual inspection. Physical examination tests and radiographical assessments are advised. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic level II.