Anterior exposure of the spine for removal of lumbar interbody devices and implants.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of a consecutive series of 14 patients operated on between March 1998 and April 2005. OBJECTIVES: To report on patients having undergone revision lumbar surgery anteriorly to remove interbody devices placed anteriorly or posteriorly and to determine the incidence of associated complications. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The popularity of interbody lumbar surgery has grown in recent years. Consequently, the number of anterior revision procedures has increased. The risks associated with anterior approach for revision procedures and interbody device removal, in particular, have not been reported. METHODS: The results of 13 consecutive patients who had removal of interbody devices through an anterior approach and 1 patient with removal of anterior fixation (7 males, 7 females; mean age 43 years) were reviewed. The procedure during which the original implant was placed was a posterior lumbar interbody fusion in 4, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 5, and anterior lumbar interbody fusion in 5 patients. Four attending spine surgeons performed the procedures with the assistance of 4 experienced access surgeons. RESULTS: Ten of 14 (71%) patients had complications associated with anterior exposure of revision surgery. Vascular injury is the most common complication (57%). Vascular complications occurred in 100% (4/4) of the revisions of previous posterior lumbar interbody fusions and 80% (4/5) of previous anterior lumbar interbody fusions. The complication rate at L4-5 and L5-S1 was 89% and 40%, respectively. There was 1 postoperative mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior removal of lumbar interbody devices placed anteriorly or posteriorly has a high incidence of complication. Average blood loss and hospital stay are increased with revision anterior surgery. The vascular complication rate is 2-fold higher at L4-L5 level compared to L5-S1.

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: an independent assessment of outcomes in a difficult patient population.

BACKGROUND: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion is becoming increasingly popular for the surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative conditions. However, the outcomes following the procedure have only begun to be evaluated. MATERIAL/METHODS: The authors reviewed all patients previously treated by TLIF at our tertiary center with minimum two year follow-up. Between 1997 and 2001, twenty-seven patients underwent the procedure. They were evaluated clinically and radiographically at regular intervals for a minimum two years following surgery and longer term follow-up was carried out by telephone interview. Long-term follow-up was undertaken by an independent assessor (a spine surgeon not directly involved in the patient's care) and outcomes were assessed using the measure designed by Macnab/McCulloch/An. Follow-up averaged 30 months and ranged from 24 to 42 months. RESULTS: All but two patients obtained a solid radiographic arthrodesis and complications were few. However, only eleven patients obtained excellent or good clinical results, while 16 had fair or poor outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: TLIF is a technically demanding procedure which can be done with relatively few complications and offers excellent rates of arthrodesis. However, the outcomes of the procedure and indications for the procedure in difficult patient populations clearly require further study.

Rheumatoid arthritis of the cervical spine.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Rheumatoid arthritis affects over 2 million patients in the United States. It is the most common inflammatory disorder of the cervical spine. The natural history is variable. Women tend to be more commonly involved than men. Atlantoaxial instability is the most common form of cervical involvement and may occur either independently or concomitantly with cranial settling and subaxial instability. Cervical spine involvement can be seen in up to 86% of patients and neurologic involvement in up to 58%. Myelopathy is rare but when present portends a poor prognosis. What is frustrating for clinicians treating these patients is that pain cannot be equated with instability or instability with neurologic symptoms. The goal is to identify patients at risk before the development of neurologic symptoms. Both radiographic and nonradiographic risk factors play an important role in the surgical decision-making process. PURPOSE: We will describe the current concepts in rheumatoid arthritis of the cervical spine. Emphasis is placed on the natural history, anatomy, pathophysiology and decision-making process. STUDY DESIGN: A review of the current concepts of rheumatoid arthritis of the cervical spine. METHODS: MEDLINE search of all English literature published on rheumatoid arthritis of the cervical spine. RESULTS: Rheumatoid arthritis of the cervical spine was first described by Garrod in 1890. The prevalence has been estimated to be 1% to 2% of the world's adult population. Despite its prevalence, the etiology of rheumatoid arthritis remains unknown. Because of its potentially debilitating and life-threatening sequelae in advanced disease, rheumatoid arthritis in the cervical spine today remains a high priority to diagnose and treat. CONCLUSIONS: Many aspects of the natural history and pathophysiology of the rheumatoid spine remain unclear. The timing of operative intervention in patients with radiographic instability and no evidence of neurologic deficit is an area of considerable controversy. Continued surveillance into the natural history of the rheumatoid spine is required.

Osteoporotic vertebral burst fractures with neurologic compromise.

A retrospective study was performed on the operative results following osteoporotic burst fractures with neurologic compromise. We sought to investigate the results of operative decompression and stabilization in patients with neurologic deficit as a result of an osteoporotic burst fractures. We examined the postoperative radiographic outcomes, level of disability, functional outcomes, and complications. Compression fractures of the anterior vertebral column secondary to osteoporosis and minimal trauma are a common clinical entity. These fractures are often effectively treated by nonoperative means. However, compressive failure of the middle vertebral column can lead to retropulsion of vertebral body fragments with significant canal compromise and neurologic injury. Treatment of these more severe injuries becomes more difficult and is less well established. Functional outcomes and disability from pain have not been examined. Previous reports on this subject have documented generally good results but have given few specific data regarding outcomes. We retrospectively report on a series of 10 patients, from 1995 to 1998, with osteoporotic burst fractures, which led to varying degrees of neurologic compromise. There were nine female and one male patient with a mean age of 76 years. Nine of the 10 patients presented more than 1 month following the onset of neurologic symptoms; 70% of the fractures occurred at the thoracolumbar junction (T11-L2). Mean loss of anterior column height was 59%, with significant kyphosis (mean 28 degrees) in nine of the 10 fractures. Mean canal compromise was 41%. At presentation, seven patients were Frankel grade D and three were Frankel grade C. All patients were treated operatively with decompression and arthrodesis. Mean time to follow-up was 16 months. Six of the 10 patients had improvement of their Frankel grade postoperatively and one deteriorated neurologically. Seven of the eight surviving patients completed the Oswestry questionnaire with a mean score of 44%, representing severe disability secondary to low back pain. The Physical Component score of the SF-36 was at or below the national mean for each patient. Complications were present in six of the eight surviving patients. Osteoporotic fractures are not benign. Careful evaluation for neurologic deterioration is warranted. Neurologic recovery occurred in six of the 10 patients; however, significant disability secondary to pain was common.

Intermediate term follow-up of calcaneal osteotomy and flexor digitorum longus transfer for treatment of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.

Twenty-three patients with stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction who had failed non-surgical therapy were treated with flexor digitorum longus transfer and calcaneal osteotomy. At latest follow-up averaging 35 +/- 7 months (range, 24 to 51 months), 22 patients (96%) were subjectively "better" or "much better." No patient had difficulty with shoe wear; however, four patients (17%) required routine orthotic use consisting of a molded shoe insert. AOFAS scores were available on 21 patients and improved from a preoperative mean of 50 +/- 14 (range, 27 to 85) to a postoperative mean of 89 +/- 10 (range, 70 to 100). Our experience, at an intermediate date follow-up is that calcaneal osteotomy and flexor digitorum longus transfer is a safe and effective form of treatment for stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.