Home sleep apnea tests: Conflicts of interest and funding.

OBJECTIVE: Pediatric otolaryngologists rely on HSAT literature to guide their diagnostic methods related to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Our objectives were to review the rates of presence of funding and/or potential conflict of interest (COI), as well as its relationship to the overall quality of HSAT publications in the literature over the last two decades. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Web of Science and Embase databases. REVIEW METHODS: A review was performed reviewing publications from January 2000 to December 2021. Oxford Level of Evidence (OLE) was used as a quality metric. COI and funding were recorded verbatim as self-declared in the text of the manuscript. RESULTS: Literature search yielded 4257 articles with 400 articles included in final analysis. The odds of higher quality studies (LOE 1 or 2) were higher in the last five years from 2016 to 2021 (OR, 3.6; 95% CI 1.4 to 6.9). Nearly half of all articles (43.0%) lacked a statement regarding funding or COI. There was a positive correlation between level of evidence and industry funding. The largest source of funding was from industry, comprising 39.6% of all studies that had a funding statement. Of these industry-funded studies, 37.5% reported no COI or lacked a COI statement. CONCLUSION: Despite a growing interest in HSATs for OSA evaluation, there is heterogeneity in reporting of COI and high prevalence of industry funding and COI. Re-evaluation and consensus amongst journals on guidelines for reporting disclosures are needed.

Poor Online Patient Ratings of Otolaryngologists in the United States: What are Patients Saying?

OBJECTIVES: Online patient forums have become a platform for patient education and advocacy in many areas of medicine. The anonymity provided by such forums may encourage honest, candid responses. Using patient online reviews, this study sought to explore themes that arose from negatively perceived care interactions with American otolaryngologists using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competency framework. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative thematic analysis. METHODS: Through an iterative multistep process, a qualitative thematic analysis was conducted on negative reviews (defined as ratings of two or less out of five) of all American otolaryngologists found on a popular online physician-rating website (RateMDs.com). RESULTS: A systematic search through the RateMDs website revealed 2950 separate comments of negative reviews. Of these negative reviews, 350 were randomly selected for thematic analysis. The predominant themes that emerged aligned closely with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competencies, in particularly with professionalism and interprofessional skills and communication. CONCLUSIONS: The negative reviews of American otolaryngologists revealed a number of areas where improvements could be made to quality of care. Patients value evidence-based medicine delivered by compassionate and respectful physicians. Isolating and aligning predominant themes within the ACGME framework proved a productive method to collect and organize pertinent patient feedback and integrate teaching into the post-graduate training and continuing professional development in order to avoid such negatively perceived interactions in the future.

What is the Current State of Extended Reality Use in Otolaryngology Training? A Scoping Review.

OBJECTIVE: To map current literature on the educational use of extended reality (XR) in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) to inform teaching and research. STUDY DESIGN: Scoping Review. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted, identifying literature through MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and Web of Science databases. Findings were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping review checklist. Studies were included if they involved OHNS trainees or medical students who used XR for an educational purpose in OHNS. XR was defined as: fully-immersive virtual reality (VR) using head-mounted displays (HMDs), non-immersive and semi-immersive VR, augmented reality (AR), or mixed reality (MR). Data on device use were extracted, and educational outcomes were analyzed according to Kirkpatrick's evaluation framework. RESULTS: Of the 1,434 unique abstracts identified, 40 articles were included. All articles reported on VR; none discussed AR or MR. Twenty-nine articles were categorized as semi-immersive, none used occlusive HMDs therefore, none met modern definitions of immersive VR. Most studies (29 of 40) targeted temporal bone surgery. Using the Kirkpatrick four-level evaluation model, all studies were limited to level-1 (learner reaction) or level-2 (knowledge or skill performance). CONCLUSIONS: Current educational applications of XR in OHNS are limited to VR, do not fully immerse participants and do not assess higher-level learning outcomes. The educational OHNS community would benefit from a shared definition for VR technology, assessment of skills transfer (level-3 and higher), and deliberate testing of AR, MR, and procedures beyond temporal bone surgery. Laryngoscope, 133:227-234, 2023.

Documentation in Pediatric Microlaryngoscopy/Bronchoscopy: International Modified Delphi Consensus.

BACKGROUND: Complete and accurate documentation of surgical procedures is essential for optimizing patient care, yet significant variation in operative notes persists within and across institutions. We sought to reach consensus on the most important components of an operative note for pediatric microlaryngoscopy and bronchoscopy. METHODS: A modified Delphi consensus process was used. A checklist for operative documentation, created by fellowship-trained pediatric otolaryngologists-head and neck surgeons, was sent to surgeons identified as experts in pediatric laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy. In the first round, items were rated as "keep" or "remove". In the second round, each item was rated on a 7-point Likert scale for importance. The mean score of each item was calculated to determine if consensus was reached. RESULTS: Overall, 43/74 (58.1%) surgeons responded to our survey. After two rounds of editing, 28 components reached consensus, 24 were near consensus, and 26 did not reach consensus. Items that reached final consensus had mean (SD) ratings of 6.12 (0.94) (range, 5.31-6.72). CONCLUSION: Pediatric otolaryngologists identified as bronchoscopy experts were able to create a checklist of essential components of an operative note for pediatric laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy using a Delphi method. Items reaching consensus included procedure name, description of breathing, grade of airway view, description of normal anatomic structures, grade of subglottic stenosis if present, presence and description of tracheobronchomalacia, presence of fistulae, cleft and rings, and several special cases including foreign body and tracheostomy management, as well as end of procedure disposition and complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 Laryngoscope, 133:1234-1238, 2023.

The race that never slows: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery residency applicant parameters over time.

Background: There has been an increasing number of Canadian medical graduates who have gone unmatched in the residency selection process. Medical students have been engaging in extracurricular activities outside the formal curriculum which may help to distinguish themselves from their peers in the selection process. To understand how competitiveness in residency selection shapes applicant demographic characteristics and behaviours, this study set out to explore the demographic characteristics and prevalence of reported extra-curricular activities by applicants to Canadian Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery (OTL-HNS) residency across time. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive study reviewed specific sections of the curriculum vitae (CV) of applicants to OTL-HNS programs in Canada. These sections were self-reported, and included research productivity, involvement in volunteer and leadership activities, membership in associations, and honours or awards granted. Data was quantified and analyzed descriptively. Results: Between 2013 to 2017, a total of 267 applicants reported a median of 12.6 research publications, 9.6 volunteer activities, six leadership activities, six association memberships and 9.8 honours/awards. Applicants were younger over time, with proportions of applicants over 30 years old decreasing from 56% in 2013 to 9% in 2017. Conclusion: Applicants to Canadian OTL-HNS residency programs are reporting consistently high numbers of extracurricular activities and were of increasingly younger ages. Medical students are investing significant time and energy to pursue these activities which are above and beyond the formal curriculum, possibly contributing to decreased diversity in applicants for competitive residencies, increasing the likelihood of misrepresentation in residency applications, and likely contributing to medical student burnout.

Contexte: De plus en plus de diplômés en médecine canadiens demeurent non jumelés à l'issue du processus de sélection des résidents. Certains font des activités hors programme afin de se distinguer de leurs pairs dans le processus de sélection. Pour comprendre comment la compétition dans la sélection de résidents influence les caractéristiques démographiques et les comportements des candidats, cette étude visait à explorer l'évolution des caractéristiques démographiques et la prévalence d'activités hors programme déclarées par les candidats à la résidence en oto-rhino-laryngologie ­ chirurgie cervico-faciale (ORL-CCF) à travers le temps. Méthodes: Dans le cadre d'une étude rétrospective et descriptive, nous avons parcouru des sections pertinentes du curriculum vitae (CV) des candidats aux programmes d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et chirurgie cervico-faciale au Canada. Ces sections étaient auto-déclarées et comprenaient les activités de recherche, la participation à des activités de bénévolat et de leadership, l'appartenance à des associations et les prix et distinctions obtenus. Les données ont été quantifiées et analysées de manière descriptive. Résultats: Entre 2013 et 2017, un total de 267 candidats ont déclaré une médiane de 12,6 publications de recherche, 9,6 activités de bénévolat, 6 activités de leadership, 6 adhésions à des associations et 9,8 prix et distinctions. Au fil du temps, on observe que les candidats sont de plus en plus jeunes ; ainsi, la proportion de candidats âgés de 30 ans et plus a diminué de 56 % en 2013 à 9 % en 2017. Conclusion: Les candidats aux programmes de résidence en ORL-CCF au Canada déclarent d'une année à l'autre un nombre élevé d'activités hors programme et sont de plus en plus jeunes. Les étudiants en médecine investissent beaucoup de temps et d'énergie dans ces activités qui vont au-delà du programme d'études officiel. Cela pourrait nuire à la diversité des candidats aux programmes de résidence fortement contingentés, augmenter la probabilité de fausses déclarations dans les demandes de résidence et probablement contribuer à l'épuisement professionnel des étudiants en médecine.

Assessing the acceptability of script concordance testing: a nationwide study in otolaryngology.

Background: Script concordance testing (SCT) is an objective method to evaluate clinical reasoning that assesses the ability to interpret medical information under conditions of uncertainty. Many studies have supported its validity as a tool to assess higher levels of learning, but little is known about its acceptability to major stakeholders. The aim of this study was to determine the acceptability of SCT to residents in otolaryngology ­ head and neck surgery (OTL-HNS) and a reference group of experts. Methods: In 2013 and 2016, a set of SCT questions, as well a post-test exit survey, were included in the National In-Training Examination (NITE) for OTL-HNS. This examination is administered to all OTL-HNS residents across Canada who are in the second to fifth year of residency. The same SCT questions and survey were then sent to a group of OTL-HNS surgeons from 4 Canadian universities. Results: For 64.4% of faculty and residents, the study was their first exposure to SCT. Overall, residents found it difficult to adapt to this form of testing, thought that the clinical scenarios were not clear and believed that SCT was not useful for assessing clinical reasoning. In contrast, the vast majority of experts felt that the test questions reflected real-life clinical situations and would recommend SCT as an evaluation method in OTL-HNS. Conclusion: Views about the acceptability of SCT as an assessment tool for clinical reasoning differed between OTL-HNS residents and experts. Education about SCT and increased exposure to this testing method are necessary to improve residents' perceptions of SCT.

Contexte: Le test de concordance de script (TCS) est une méthode objective d'évaluation du raisonnement clinique qui mesure la capacité d'interpréter les renseignements médicaux en contexte d'incertitude. Beaucoup d'études en appuient la validité en tant qu'outil pour évaluer l'enseignement supérieur, mais on en sait peu sur son acceptabilité auprès des principales parties prenantes. Le but de cette étude était de déterminer l'acceptabilité du TCS chez les résidents en otorhinolaryngologie ­ chirurgie de la tête et du cou (ORL ­ chirurgie tête et cou) et un groupe de référence composé d'experts. Méthodes: En 2013 et 2016, une série de questions de TCS, de même qu'un questionnaire post-test, ont été inclus dans l'examen national en cours de formation NITE (National In-Training Examination) pour l'ORL ­ chirurgie tête et cou. Cet examen est administré à tous les résidents en ORL ­ chirurgie tête et cou au Canada qui sont entre leurs deuxième et cinquième années de résidence. Les mêmes questions de TCS ont été envoyées à un groupe de chirurgiens en ORL ­ chirurgie tête et cou de 4 université canadiennes. Résultats: Pour 64,4 % des membres facultaires et des résidents, l'étude était leur première exposition au TCS. Dans l'ensemble, les résidents ont trouvé difficile de s'adapter à cette forme de test, même si les scénarios cliniques étaient clairs, et ils ont estimé que le TCS était peu utile pour évaluer le raisonnement clinique. En revanche, la grande majorité des experts ont jugé que les questions du test reflétaient la réalité des cas cliniques et recommanderaient le TCS comme méthode d'évaluation en ORL ­ chirurgie tête et cou. Conclusion: Entre les résidents et les experts en ORL ­ chirurgie tête et cou, les points de vue quant à l'acceptabilité du TCS comme outil d'évaluation du raisonnement clinique ont différé et il faudrait y exposer les résidents davantage pour améliorer leur perception du TCS.

"It's a Big Part of Being Good Surgeons": Surgical Trainees' Perceptions of Error Recovery in the Operating Room.

BACKGROUND: The burden of surgical error is high - errors threaten patient safety, lead to increased economic costs to society, and contribute to physician and resident burnout. To date, the majority of work has focused on strategies for reducing the incidence of surgical error, however, total error eradication remains unrealistic. Errors are, to some extent, unavoidable. Adequate preparation for practice should include optimal ways to manage and recover from errors; yet, these skills are rarely taught or assessed. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to explore residents' perceptions and experiences of surgical error recovery. More specifically, we documented participant definitions of error recovery, and explored factors that were perceived to influence error recovery experiences and training in the operating room. METHOD: Guided by a qualitative descriptive approach, we conducted semi-structured interviews with residents and fellows in surgical specialties in Canada and the United States. Purposive and snowball sampling were used to recruit residents and fellows in postgraduate year 1 to 5. Interviews were transcribed, analyzed and inductively coded. RESULTS: A total of 15 residents and fellows participated. When exploring the importance of error recovery for the trainees, competency and safety emerged as main themes, with error recovery being considered an indicator of overall surgical competency. Data concerning factors perceived to influence error recovery training were grouped under 4 major themes: (1) supervision (supervisor-related factors such as attending behaviors and reactions to errors), (2) self (factors such as self-assessed competency), (3) surgical context (factors related to the specific surgery or patient), and (4) situation safeness. Situational safeness was identified as a transversal theme describing factors to be considered when balancing between patient safety and the learning benefits of error recovery training. CONCLUSION: Error recovery was considered to be an important skill for safe surgical practice and was considered an important educational target for learners during surgical training. Trainees' opportunities to learn to recover from technical errors in the OR are perceived to be influenced by several factors, leading to variable experiences and inconsistent opportunities to practice error recovery skills. Focusing on factors related to "supervision," "self," "surgery," and "situational safeness" may be an initial framework on which to build initial educational interventions to support the development of error recovery skills to better support safe surgical practice.

Quality indicators for the diagnosis and management of pediatric tonsillitis.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric tonsillitis is encountered frequently across specialties, and while high quality guidelines exist, there is persistent evidence of care which is not evidence based, including antibiotic overprescribing and surgical practice variability. Quality indicators (QIs) can be utilized for initiatives to improve the quality of care and subsequent patient outcomes. We sought to develop pediatric tonsillitis QIs that are applicable across specialties and that cover aspects of both diagnosis and the spectrum of management options. METHODS: A guideline-based approach to QI development was employed. Candidate indicators (CIs) were extracted from international guidelines deemed high quality by two reviewers and evaluated by an eleven-member expert panel consisting of otolaryngology - head & neck surgeons, a pediatrician and a family physician. The final QIs were selected utilizing a modified RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology. RESULTS: Twenty-six CIs were identified after initial literature review. After the first round of evaluations, the panel agreed on thirteen candidate indicators as appropriate QIs. A subsequent expert panel meeting provided a platform to discuss areas of disagreement, discuss any recently published research, and to brainstorm additional CIs not identified from the guideline extraction. Following the second round of evaluations, the expert panel agreed upon sixteen QIs as appropriate measures of high-quality care. CONCLUSIONS: This study proposes sixteen QIs developed through a multidisciplinary lens to guide practitioners in the diagnosis and management of pediatric tonsillitis. These QIs can be used to improve transparency, accountability, and provide objective data to assist future quality improvement initiatives.

Personal protective equipment availability and usage amongst pediatric otorhinolaryngologists during the COVID-19 pandemic: An international survey.

OBJECTIVES: To survey a group of global pediatric otolaryngology specialists to assess their usage and access to personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A survey of 13 questions was created collecting information on: basic demographics of practice, types of PPE used for procedures of varying aerosolization risk, access to positive air-purifying respirator (PAPR) and patient testing for SARS-CoV-2. Pediatric otolaryngologists were invited to complete the survey via Whatsapp™. RESULTS: 96 responses were collected from 17 different countries. N95 was the most commonly utilized PPE when dealing with COVID-19 patients (64.2%-81.9% depending on aerosolization risk of the procedure). Significantly higher use of PAPR was noted in high-risk aerosolization generating medical procedures, when compared to other risks. Face covering was used consistently (91.6%). Most respondents (78.1%, n = 75) had access to PAPR or had at least requested it. The majority of patients (56.2%, n = 54) was being tested for SARS-CoV-2 prior to procedures performed in operating rooms (OR); whereas, only 1.1% (n = 1) of clinic patients were tested for SARS-CoV-2 irrespective of the history or symptomatology. CONCLUSIONS: Most pediatric otolaryngologists used N95 and some form of face covering (eg. goggles, face shields) when dealing with patients with COVID-19 positive status. PAPR was used in situations of high aerosolization risk. Majority of respondents were screening all patients prior to procedures in the operating room.

Error Detection-Based Model to Assess Educational Outcomes in Crisis Resource Management Training: A Pilot Study.

Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OTL-HNS) residents face a variety of difficult, high-stress situations, which may occur early in their training. Since these events occur infrequently, simulation-based learning has become an important part of residents' training and is already well established in fields such as anesthesia and emergency medicine. In the domain of OTL-HNS, it is gradually gaining in popularity. Crisis Resource Management (CRM), a program adapted from the aviation industry, aims to improve outcomes of crisis situations by attempting to mitigate human errors. Some examples of CRM principles include cultivating situational awareness; promoting proper use of available resources; and improving rapid decision making, particularly in high-acuity, low-frequency clinical situations. Our pilot project sought to integrate CRM principles into an airway simulation course for OTL-HNS residents, but most important, it evaluated whether learning objectives were met, through use of a novel error identification model.