RESUMO
This was the third annual validity study designed to assess the accuracy of the HESI Exit Exam (E) in predicting NCLEX success for graduating registered and practical nursing students. As in year I (N = 2,725) and year II (N = 3,752), in year III (N = 6,277), the E was highly predictive of NCLEX success for associate degree nursing, bachelor of science nursing, diploma, and practical nursing students. Unlike previous years, in year III, monitoring was not a significant factor in the predictive accuracy of the E. NCLEX success of low-scoring E students, first examined in year II, was also examined in year III. As in year II, low-scoring E students were significantly more (P = .001) likely to fail the licensure examination than high-scoring E students. In year III, unlike year II, there was no significant difference in the pass rate of low-scoring E students who participated in a remediation program and those who did not. The authors recommended that a more definitive definition of remediation be used in future studies and that such studies focus on E implementation strategies and their relationship to NCLEX success.
RESUMO
The fourth annual validity study of the Health Education Systems, Inc. (HESI) Exit Exam was designed to examine not only the accuracy of the examination in predicting NCLEX success but also the degree of risk for failure of the licensure examination associated with specific scoring intervals. A descriptive comparative design was used to examine the data provided by schools of nursing regarding students' NCLEX outcomes in the 1999-2000 academic year. As in the 3 previous studies, the examination was found to be a highly accurate predictor of NCLEX success (98.46%). Each scoring interval was significantly different from each of the other scoring intervals (P = .001). In fact, for the combined group of registered nurse and practical nurse students, the percentage of students who failed the NCLEX more than doubled with each successively lower scoring interval. These findings provide the information faculties needed to make evidence-based decisions regarding students' risks for NCLEX failure. Additionally, frequency data were obtained from this survey regarding the use of the examination as a benchmark for progression and remediation, and these findings may also be useful to faculties that are considering establishing such programs.
RESUMO
Evidence exists indicating that remediation positively affects NCLEX success of students with known academic deficits. However, specific benchmarks that identify students who are at risk of NCLEX failure and in need of remediation have not been identified. Following publication of research findings that established the reliability and validity of the HESI Exit Exam (E) as an accurate measure of students' NCLEX preparedness, nurse educators increasingly chose administer the E to their senior students. This study investigated using the E as a benchmark for progression and as a guide for remediation.
RESUMO
This article responds to issues raised in 2004 by Spurlock and Hanks, who interpreted data that were presented in four published studies describing the validity of the Health Education Systems, Inc. (HESI) Exit Examination. The argument for using classical testing theory as the preferred theoretical framework to a clinical disease detection model is advanced. While the Spurlock and Hanks article promotes a philosophical bias against the establishment of progression policies within schools of nursing, this article offers another assessment of the merits of detecting at-risk students so timely remediation can occur prior to administration of the National Council Licensure Examination for Registered Nurses (NCLEX-RN). From data presented in the four validity studies, the HESI Exit Examination was reported to be 96.36% to 98.30% accurate in predicting NCLEX-RN success, and those original findings are reaffirmed.
Assuntos
Bacharelado em Enfermagem/organização & administração , Avaliação Educacional , Licenciamento em Enfermagem , Modelos Educacionais , Escolas de Enfermagem/organização & administração , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Tomada de Decisões Gerenciais , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Avaliação Educacional/normas , Avaliação Educacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Docentes de Enfermagem/organização & administração , Humanos , Licenciamento em Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Psicológicos , Pesquisa em Educação em Enfermagem , Política Organizacional , Filosofia em Enfermagem , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Preconceito , Psicologia Educacional , Ensino de Recuperação , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Medição de Risco , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
This was the third annual validity study designed to assess the accuracy of the HESI Exit Exam (E2) in predicting NCLEX success for graduating registered and practical nursing students. As in year I (N = 2,725) and year II (N = 3,752), in year III (N = 6,277), the E2 was highly predictive of NCLEX success for associate degree nursing, bachelor of science nursing, diploma, and practical nursing students. Unlike previous years, in year IIl, monitoring was not a significant factor in the predictive accuracy of the E2. NCLEX success of low-scoring E2 students, first examined in year II, was also examined in year Ill. As in year II, low-scoring E2 students were significantly more (P = .001) likely to fail the licensure examination than high-scoring E2 students, in year Ill, unlike year II, there was no significant difference in the pass rate of low-scoring E2 students who participated in a remediation program and those who did not. The authors recommended that a more definitive definition of remediation be used in future studies and that such studies focus on E2 implementation strategies and their relationship to NCLEX success.
RESUMO
The fourth annual validity study of the Health Education Systems, Inc. (HESI) Exit Exam was designed to examine not only the accuracy of the examination in predicting NCLEX success but also the degree of risk for failure of the licensure examination associated with specific scoring intervals. A descriptive comparative design was used to examine the data provided by schools of nursing regarding students' NCLEX outcomes in the 1999-2000 academic year. As in the 3 previous studies, the examination was found to be a highly accurate predictor of NCLEX success (98.46%). Each scoring interval was significantly different from each of the other scoring intervals (P = .001). In fact, for the combined group of registered nurse and practical nurse students, the percentage of students who failed the NCLEX more than doubled with each successively lower scoring interval. These findings provide the information faculties needed to make evidence-based decisions regarding students' risks for NCLEX failure. Additionally, frequency data were obtained from this survey regarding the use of the examination as a benchmark for progression and remediation, and these findings may also be useful to faculties that are considering establishing such programs.
RESUMO
Evidence exists indicating that remediation positively affects NCLEX success of students with known academic deficits. However, specific benchmarks that identify students who are at risk of NCLEX failure and in need of remediation have not been identified. Following publication of research findings that established the reliability and validity of the HESI Exit Exam (E2) as an accurate measure of students' NCLEX preparedness, nurse educators increasingly chose to administer the E2 to their senior students. This study investigated using the E2 as a benchmark for progression and as a guide for remediation.
Assuntos
Bacharelado em Enfermagem , Avaliação Educacional , Licenciamento em Enfermagem , Pesquisa em Educação em Enfermagem/normas , Projetos de Pesquisa/normas , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Bacharelado em Enfermagem/organização & administração , Avaliação Educacional/normas , Humanos , Modelos Estatísticos , Política Organizacional , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Escolas de Enfermagem/organização & administraçãoAssuntos
Reanimação Cardiopulmonar , Educação em Enfermagem , Ética em Enfermagem/educação , Família , Visitas a Pacientes , Adulto , Reanimação Cardiopulmonar/enfermagem , Tomada de Decisões/ética , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Qualidade de Vida , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The shortage of nurses is here, and the complexity of the issues involved will take time to resolve. Undoubtedly, this process will be slow and frustrating. Critically ill patients who require intensive, highly skilled nursing care are among those most affected by the shortage of nurses. Nursing service, in partnership with nursing education, should create innovative strategies that will ultimately alleviate the shortage of nurses. What we have to gain is more precious resources, our new graduates filling all the chairs in future summer critical care orientation classes.
Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/organização & administração , Educação Técnica em Enfermagem/organização & administração , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros/provisão & distribuição , Estudantes de Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Educação Técnica em Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Humanos , Licenciamento em Enfermagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Opinião Pública , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Benchmarking , Educação Técnica em Enfermagem/normas , Bacharelado em Enfermagem/normas , Programas de Graduação em Enfermagem/normas , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Licenciamento em Enfermagem , Ensino de Recuperação/métodos , Avaliação Educacional/normas , Humanos , Avaliação das Necessidades , Pesquisa em Educação em EnfermagemRESUMO
The fourth annual validity study of the Health Education Systems, Inc. (HESI) Exit Exam was designed to examine not only the accuracy of the examination in predicting NCLEX success but also the degree of risk for failure of the licensure examination associated with specific scoring intervals. A descriptive comparative design was used to examine the data provided by schools of nursing regarding students' NCLEX outcomes in the 1999-2000 academic year. As in the 3 previous studies, the examination was found to be a highly accurate predictor of NCLEX success (98.46%). Each scoring interval was significantly different from each of the other scoring intervals ( =.001). In fact, for the combined group of registered nurse and practical nurse students, the percentage of students who failed the NCLEX more than doubled with each successively lower scoring interval. These findings provide the information faculties needed to make evidence-based decisions regarding students' risks for NCLEX failure. Additionally, frequency data were obtained from this survey regarding the use of the examination as a benchmark for progression and remediation, and these findings may also be useful to faculties that are considering establishing such programs.