Natural Language Processing for Surveillance of Cervical and Anal Cancer and Precancer: Algorithm Development and Split-Validation Study.

BACKGROUND: Accurate identification of new diagnoses of human papillomavirus-associated cancers and precancers is an important step toward the development of strategies that optimize the use of human papillomavirus vaccines. The diagnosis of human papillomavirus cancers hinges on a histopathologic report, which is typically stored in electronic medical records as free-form, or unstructured, narrative text. Previous efforts to perform surveillance for human papillomavirus cancers have relied on the manual review of pathology reports to extract diagnostic information, a process that is both labor- and resource-intensive. Natural language processing can be used to automate the structuring and extraction of clinical data from unstructured narrative text in medical records and may provide a practical and effective method for identifying patients with vaccine-preventable human papillomavirus disease for surveillance and research. OBJECTIVE: This study's objective was to develop and assess the accuracy of a natural language processing algorithm for the identification of individuals with cancer or precancer of the cervix and anus. METHODS: A pipeline-based natural language processing algorithm was developed, which incorporated machine learning and rule-based methods to extract diagnostic elements from the narrative pathology reports. To test the algorithm's classification accuracy, we used a split-validation study design. Full-length cervical and anal pathology reports were randomly selected from 4 clinical pathology laboratories. Two study team members, blinded to the classifications produced by the natural language processing algorithm, manually and independently reviewed all reports and classified them at the document level according to 2 domains (diagnosis and human papillomavirus testing results). Using the manual review as the gold standard, the algorithm's performance was evaluated using standard measurements of accuracy, recall, precision, and F-measure. RESULTS: The natural language processing algorithm's performance was validated on 949 pathology reports. The algorithm demonstrated accurate identification of abnormal cytology, histology, and positive human papillomavirus tests with accuracies greater than 0.91. Precision was lowest for anal histology reports (0.87, 95% CI 0.59-0.98) and highest for cervical cytology (0.98, 95% CI 0.95-0.99). The natural language processing algorithm missed 2 out of the 15 abnormal anal histology reports, which led to a relatively low recall (0.68, 95% CI 0.43-0.87). CONCLUSIONS: This study outlines the development and validation of a freely available and easily implementable natural language processing algorithm that can automate the extraction and classification of clinical data from cervical and anal cytology and histology.

The liability of the anaesthesiologist in ambulatory surgery.

With the development of ambulatory surgery, there may be questions about the legal risk of this procedure. Indeed, the discharge of the patient from the hospital on the same day as the medical treatment raises the problem of monitoring and supervising potential complications, with a substantial delay in medical care, and the anaesthesiologists can be confronted with new areas of liability. This article specifies the French statutory and legal framework of the ambulatory surgery, and shows how the responsibility of the anaesthesiologist can be involved during patient care at all steps. The analysis of judicial precedent shows that the legal risk for the anaesthesiologist also exists in outpatient surgery. Surgery and anaesthesia are medical procedures involving a relatively high risk of damage for the patient. The damage can be attributed to malpractice from one or several health care professionals or to a medical complication (abnormal damage not related to malpractice and independent of past medical history of the patient). In the light of the ongoing and significant development in ambulatory surgery, there may be questions about the legal risk of this procedure. Indeed, the discharge of the patient from the hospital on the same day as the medical treatment raises the problem of monitoring and supervising potential complications, with a substantial delay in medical care. If the patient suffers any damage, the surgeon, the anaesthesiologist and in some cases, the hospital will have to answer in courts: the surgeon for the surgical procedure, the anaesthesiologist for the medical care and the hospital as the liable institution. After having specified the statutory framework of ambulatory surgery, we will see how the responsibility of the anaesthesiologist can be involved during patient care at all steps.

Persistent neuropathic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy depending on the procedure (open mesh v. laparoscopy): a propensity-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: A greater incidence of persistent pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy is suspected with the open mesh procedure than with laparoscopy (transabdominal preperitoneal), but the involvement of neuropathy needs to be clarified. METHODS: We examined the cumulative incidence of neuropathic persistent pain, defined as self-report of pain at the surgical site with neuropathic aspects, within 6 months after surgery in 2 prospective subcohorts of a multicentre study. We compared open mesh with laparoscopy using different analysis, including a propensity-matched analysis with the propensity score built from a multivariable analysis using a generalized linear model. RESULTS: Considering the full patient sample (242 open mesh v. 126 laparoscopy), the raw odds ratio for neuropathic persistent pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy was 4.3. It reached 6.8 with the propensity-matched analysis conducted on pooled subgroups of 194 patients undergoing open mesh and 125 undergoing laparoscopy (95% confidence interval 1.5-30.4, p = 0.012). A risk factor analysis of these pooled subgroups revealed that history of peripheral neuropathy was an independent risk factor for persistent neuropathic pain, while older age was protective. CONCLUSION: We found a greater risk of persistent pain with open mesh than with laparoscopy that may be explained by direct or indirect lesion of nerve terminations. Strategies to identify and preserve nerve terminations with the open mesh procedure are needed.

CONTEXTE: On soupçonne que l'incidence de la douleur persistante à la suite d'une hernioplastie inguinale est plus élevée avec la mise en place d'un filet par voie ouverte qu'avec la laparoscopie (transabdominale prépéritonéale), mais encore faut-il clarifier le rôle de la neuropathie. MÉTHODES: Nous avons mesuré l'incidence cumulative de la douleur neuropathique persistante, décrite comme une douleur au site opératoire accompagnée d'éléments neuropathiques déclarés par le patient dans les 6 mois suivant la chirurgie, auprès de 2 sous-cohortes prospectives d'une étude multicentrique. Nous avons comparé la mise en place d'un filet par voie ouverte et la laparoscopie à l'aide de différentes analyses, dont une analyse avec appariement des scores de propension, les scores de propension découlant d'une analyse multivariée générée à partir d'un modèle linéaire généralisé. RÉSULTANTS: En tenant compte de tout l'échantillon de patients (242 soumis à la mise en place d'un filet par voie ouverte c. 126 soumis à la laparoscopie), le rapport des cotes brut pour la douleur neuropathique persistante après l'hernioplastie inguinale était de 4,3. Il a atteint 6,8 à l'analyse par appariement des scores de propension réalisée auprès de sous-groupes réunis de 194 patients soumis à la technique ouverte avec treillis et 125 soumis à la laparoscopie (intervalle de confiance à 95 % 1,5­30,4, p = 0,012). Une analyse des facteurs de risque pour ces sous-groupes réunis a révélé que des antécédents de neuropathie périphérique constituaient un facteur de risque indépendant à l'égard de la douleur neuropathique persistante, tandis que l'avancée en âge a conféré un effet protecteur. CONCLUSION: Nous avons observé un risque plus élevé de douleur persistante associée à la mise en place d'un filet par voie ouverte qu'avec la laparoscopie, ce qui pourrait s'expliquer par des lésions directes ou indirectes aux terminaisons nerveuses. Des stratégies s'imposent pour identifier et préserver les terminaisons nerveuses lors de la mise en place d'un filet par voie ouverte.