Quality-improvement analytics for intravenous infusion pumps.

PURPOSE: The implementation of a smart-pump continuous quality-improvement (CQI) program across a large health system is described, with an emphasis on key metrics for outcomes analyses and program refinement. SUMMARY: Three years ago, the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center health system launched a CQI initiative to help ensure the safe use of 6000 smart pumps in its 14 inpatient facilities. A centralized team led by pharmacists is responsible for the retrieval and interpretation of smart-pump data, which is continuously transmitted to a main server. CQI findings are regularly posted on the health system's interdisciplinary intranet. Monitored metrics include rates of compliance with preprogrammed infusion limits, the top 20 drugs involved in alerts, drugs associated with alert-override rates of ≥90%, numbers of alerts by infusion type, nurse responses to alerts, and alert rate per drug library update. Based on the collected CQI data and site-specific requests, four systemwide updates of the smart-pump drug library were performed during the first 18 months of the program, reducing "nuisance alerts" by about 10% per update cycle and enabling targeted interventions to reduce rapid-infusion errors, other adverse drug events (ADEs), and pump-programming workarounds. Over one 12-month period, bedside alerts prompted nurses to reprogram or cancel continuous infusions an average of 400 times per month, potentially averting i.v. medication ADEs. CONCLUSION: A smart-pump CQI program is an effective tool for enhancing the safety of i.v. medication administration. The ongoing refinement of the drug library through the development and implementation of key interventions promotes the growth and sustainability of the smart-pump initiative systemwide.

Unfractionated heparin: focus on a high-alert drug.

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is associated with a high rate of drug-related problems due to either its inherent pharmacologic properties or an extension of these properties often caused by medication errors. The drug-related problems associated with UFH can significantly hinder the success of therapy and negatively affect the overall cost of care. Unfractionated heparin has been classified as a high-alert drug by the Institute for Safe Medication Practices. Approximately 2.1% of the total records submitted to the MedMARx national error database were related to UFH; 4.5-5.5% of these errors reported were harmful. With this high potential for error, it is essential that all health care providers adopt a collaborative or systems approach to identify solutions to reduce the occurrence of these medication errors. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations has published national patient safety goals for improving the safety of patient care, many of which are applicable to UFH therapy. Unfractionated heparin drug-related problems not necessarily related to medication errors include heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, bleeding events, and osteopenia. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a serious complication of heparin therapy and remains seriously undiagnosed. Bleeding events often occur with therapeutic as well as prophylactic UFH administration even when monitoring indexes are within the therapeutic range. However, due to the variability associated with UFH monitoring methods, definitive guidelines are lacking to assist in avoiding such serious events. Osteopenia has been associated with long-term UFH therapy; one third of patients experience reductions in bone density, potentially leading to fractures. Today, safer alternative anticoagulation therapies are available, such as the low-molecular-weight heparins. When compared with UFH, these alternative therapies provide equivalent or superior efficacy for numerous indications.

Venous thromboembolism prevention with LMWHs in medical and orthopedic surgery patients.

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the role of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) in the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in medical and orthopedic surgery patients. VTE prophylaxis trials in these practice settings establishing the current use of LMWHs marketed in the US are included. An overview is also provided of VTE incidence, risk factors, and prophylaxis consensus guidelines. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: Clinical trials, review articles, and meta-analyses for Food and Drug Administration-approved LMWHs were identified from a MEDLINE search (1980-March 2002). Search terms included dalteparin, enoxaparin, internal medicine, low-molecular-weight heparin, orthopedic surgery, risk factors, tinzaparin, and venous thromboembolism. DATA SYNTHESIS: Consensus guidelines are useful as an initial guide to appropriate VTE prophylaxis; however, a review of the primary literature is needed to identify optimal agents, regimens, or interventions. LMWHs have demonstrated sound efficacy in VTE prevention; however, the quantity and quality of literature are not always comparable for the available agents. CONCLUSIONS: Enoxaparin has demonstrated efficacy and safety in VTE prevention in medical patients, whereas information is limited or lacking for dalteparin and tinzaparin. Total hip replacement (THR) trials have been conducted with all US-marketed LMWHs and have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of each agent. Trials specifically establishing the efficacy of an LMWH in total knee replacement surgery (TKR) have been published for enoxaparin. One combination THR and TKR trial has been published for tinzaparin. These trial outcomes have positioned the LMWHs as key alternatives to adjusted-dose warfarin for VTE prophylaxis in orthopedic surgery. Inherent differences between LMWHs prevent the extrapolation of clinical outcomes from 1 trial to another.