The effect of preparation height and luting agent on the resistance form of cemented cast crowns under load fatigue.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The minimum amount of resistance form required for the success of a clinical crown is unknown.There is little information on the fatigue performance of complete coverage restorations on natural tooth preparations cemented with different luting cements. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of tooth preparation height and luting agent on resistance form using unidirectional load fatigue testing. For a given tooth preparation with a clinically relevant total occlusal convergence (TOC), the adequacy of resistance form was investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-four human maxillary premolars were prepared with occlusal-cervical dimensions of 2, 3,4, or 5 mm and a TOC of 20 degrees. Complete metal crowns were cemented using either zinc phosphate cement (HY Bond;ZP groups) or resin cement (Panavia F; PF groups). Cyclic load fatigue testing was done with an applied load of 6.0 kg at 2.6 Hz. Load cycles to preliminary failure were detected with a strain gauge at the palatal crown-tooth interface. Results were subjected to the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Wilcoxon post-hoc rank sum test (alpha=.05). RESULTS: Groups ZP4, ZP5, PF2, PF3, PF4, and PF5 had the highest mean number of cycles to preliminary failure,while group ZP2 had the lowest mean number of cycles to failure. Group ZP2 was significantly different (P<.001) from all other test groups for the number of cycles to failure. CONCLUSIONS: For the 2- and 3-mm preparation height groups, zinc phosphate cement exhibited a poorer fatigue performance compared to Panavia F. There was no significant difference in the number of cycles to failure for groups ZP4,ZP5, PF2, PF3, PF4, and PF5. For both cements, the number of cycles to failure increased with increasing resistance length. (J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:155-164)

Load-fatigue performance of gold crowns luted with resin cements.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Resin cements have gained popularity over the past few years because of their improved physical properties. There is a need to test these cements under fatigue loading, as there is growing recognition that fatigue testing is more clinically relevant than traditional monotonic static tests. PURPOSE: This study investigated the load-fatigue performance of complete gold crowns cemented with 4 types of resin cement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four resin cements (C & B Opaque [CBO], Calibra Esthetic [CE], RelyX Unicem [RU], and Panavia F [PF]) and a control, zinc phosphate cement (HY-Bond [HBZPC]) were tested. Fifty human maxillary premolars were prepared to an occluso-cervical dimension of 4 mm and a convergence angle of 20 degrees. Complete gold crowns were cast (Strator 3) and cemented with 1 of the 5 cements (n=10). A fatigue load of 73.5 N was applied at an angle of 135 degrees to the long axis of each tooth-crown specimen. Preliminary failure was defined as the propagation of a crack in or around the crown luting cement layer. The number of cycles to preliminary failure and the cement failure location were determined. Significant differences in cycles to preliminary failure were assessed by the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test, with follow-up Mann-Whitney tests (alpha=.05). RESULTS: Group CE had the highest rank of cycles to preliminary failure, while HBZPC had the lowest cycles to preliminary failure. Group CE had a significantly higher failure cycle count compared to PF (P=.016), RU (P=.001), and HBZPC (P<.001), but was not significantly different from CBO (P=.112). There was no significant difference in the failure cycle count between RU and HBZPC (P=.070). CONCLUSION: Not all tested resin cements had a superior fatigue life when compared with zinc phosphate cement. Of the 4 resin cement groups, Groups CE, CBO, and PF were significantly superior to HBZPC.