Patient preference the leading indication for elective Caesarean section in public patients--results of a 2-year prospective audit in a teaching hospital.

In response to a Western Australian Ministerial enquiry into the levels of intervention in childbirth, a 2-year prospective audit was undertaken of the indication and timing of all public Caesarean section deliveries at King Edward Memorial hospital. During the study period, a total of 9,138 deliveries were performed at the hospital, of which 1,624 were by Caesarean section, an overall rate of 17.8%. Of these, 633 (39%) were elective and 911 (61%) were nonelective. The most common primary indication for elective Caesarean section was maternal choice, largely due to a refusal of the patient to consent to a trial of scar following a single previous Caesarean section or a refusal to attempt a trial of vaginal breech delivery. The most common indications for nonelective Caesarean section birth were an intrapartum diagnosis of suspected fetal distress or failure to progress in labour. Strategies to reduce the incidence of Caesarean section birth need to focus on the pathways involved with maternal decision-making in the birth process, and on improving the diagnosis of intrapartum fetal compromise.

Diagnostic overshadowing and mental retardation: a meta-analysis.

Clinicians who minimize the significance of emotional disorders in persons with mental retardation may be displaying the diagnostic overshadowing judgmental bias. A meta-analysis of the existing literature on this bias was conducted to determine its reliability, the size of its effect, and its potential clinical significance. Results show the effect to be reliable across studies; the size of the effect was small to moderate. Interpretation of the clinical significance of these results is clouded by the absence of in vivo studies. Additional concerns include insufficient attention given to clinician and situational variables moderating the presence of diagnostic overshadowing.