Diagnostic accuracy of Truenat MTB Plus, Truenat MTB Ultima and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for the diagnosis of pulmonary TB in an HIV-endemic setting.

Background: Truenat MTB Plus (MTB Plus) and MTB Ultima (Ultima) are World Health Organization-endorsed low-complexity tuberculosis (TB) tests, however, performance data are scarce. Methods: Adults (≥18 years; n=498) self-presenting with symptoms to primary care clinics in Cape Town, South Africa (19/02/2016-22/02/2023) provided sputa. We evaluated the accuracy of MTB Plus and Ultima, with Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra) as a comparator, vs. a single culture (TB reference standard) or MTBDR plus on an isolate (rifampicin susceptibility reference standard). Results: The proportion of MTB Plus and Ultima unsuccessful results was 20% (95% confidence interval 17, 23) and 14 (11, 16), respectively, with ≥half resolving upon retesting the same eluate. In a three-way analysis, MTB Plus, Ultima and Ultra had sensitivities of 84% (78, 88), 90% (85, 93), and 92% (87, 95), and specificities of 95% (92, 97), 85% (80, 88) and 95% (92, 97) for TB. The proportion of unsuccessful results for MTB-RIF Dx done the same day as DNA extraction was 9% (3, 16; MTB Plus-positives) and 18% (10, 26; Ultima-positives) [if after day-of-extraction, these were 27% (18, 35) and 44% (35, 51)]. Same-day rifampicin susceptibility testing was often unsuccessful in samples with "very low" load [73% (58, 89) MTB Plus, 75% (65, 86) Ultima] but had 100% (40, 100) sensitivity and 99% (96, 100) specificity (for both MTB Plus- or Ultima-positive DNA). Lot variation in unsuccessful and false-positive results was observed. Conclusion: Ultima showed comparable sensitivity to Ultra but specificity, lot variation, and, like MTB-RIF Dx, unsuccessful result rates were suboptimal. Funding: European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership, and South African Medical Research Council.

Error Rates in Race and Ethnicity Designation Across Large Pediatric Health Systems.

Importance: Without knowledge of the degree of misattribution in racial and ethnic designations in data, studies run the risk of missing existing inequities and disparities and identifying others that do not exist. Further, accuracy of racial and ethnic designations is important to clinical care improvement efforts and health outcomes. Objective: To determine the error rate of racial and ethnic attribution in the electronic medical records (EMRs) across the 3 largest pediatric health systems in Michigan. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study collected race and ethnicity data from parents in outpatient clinics, emergency departments, and inpatient units at the 3 largest pediatric health systems in Michigan. A total of 1594 parents or guardians participated at health system A, 1537 at health system B, and 1202 at health system C from September 1, 2023, to January 31, 2024. Parent or guardian report of race and ethnicity for a child was used as the gold standard for comparison with the designation in the EMR. Exposure: Race and ethnicity designations in the EMR. Options for race designation across the health systems ranged from 6 to 49; options for ethnicity, from 2 to 10. Main Outcomes and Measures: Matching occurred in 3 stages. First, the exact racial and ethnic designations made by parents for their child were compared with what was found in the EMR. Second, for any child whose parent selected more than 1 racial category or for whom more than 1 appeared in the EMR, the designation of a minoritized racial group was used for matching purposes. Third, starting with the product of stage 2, racial designations were combined or collapsed into 6 (health systems A and C) or 5 (health system B) designations. Results: A total of 4333 survey responses were included in the analysis. The greatest error rate across the health systems occurred with the exact match of parental report of racial designation with the EMR, which ranged from 41% to 78% across the health systems. Improvement in the matching rate for each health system occurred with consolidation of race options provided. Differences between the health systems narrowed at the final consolidation to varying from 79% to 88% matching. Ethnicity matching between the EMR and the parental report ranged from 65% to 95% across the health systems. Missing race or ethnicity data in the EMR was counted as a nonmatch. Rates of missing racial data varied across the health systems from 2% to 10%. The health system with the greatest number of options for race and ethnicity had the highest error rates. Conclusions and Relevance: Although there will always be some misattribution of race and ethnicity in the EMR, the results of this cross-sectional study suggest that significant error in these data may undermine strategies to improve care. It is unclear whether those in an organization who determine the number of potential categories are the same persons who use those data to investigate potential disparities and inequities.

Diagnostic accuracy of LiquidArray MTB-XDR VER1.0 for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, fluoroquinolone, amikacin, ethambutol, and linezolid susceptibility.

Drug susceptibility testing (DST) is essential for effectively starting people on effective tuberculosis (TB) regimens. No accuracy data exists for the new high-throughput LiquidArray MTB-XDR (LA-XDR) test, which detects Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) and susceptibility to the fluoroquinolones, amikacin, ethambutol, and linezolid (the latter two drugs have no rapid molecular DSTs available). We enrolled (n=720) people with presumptive TB who provided two sputa for Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra and culture (MTBC reference standard). Phenotypic DST and Sanger sequencing served as a composite reference standard. Manual FluoroLyse and automated GenoXtract-fleXT (fleXT) DNA extraction methods were compared. For MTBC, LA-XDR using fleXT-extracted or FluoroLyse-extracted DNA had similar sensitivities (85-87%; which improved upon eluate retesting) and specificities (99%). Drug susceptibility sensitivities varied: 94% (86, 98) for fluoroquinolones, 64% (45, 80) for amikacin, and 88% (79, 93) for ethambutol (specificities 97-100%). LA-XDR detected 86% (6/7) phenotypically resistant linezolid isolates. LA-XDR with fleXT had indeterminate proportions of 8% (21/251) for fluoroquinolones, 1% (2/251) for ethambutol, 25% (63/251) for amikacin, and 37% (93/251) for linezolid. In a hypothetical population of 100 smear-negative fluoroquinolones-resistant cases, 24% (24/100) could be missed due to an unsuccessful result (1 fleXT error and, for LA-XDR, 2 invalid results, 15 MTBC-negative, 6 fluoroquinolone-indeterminate, 1 false-susceptible). LA-XDR met the minimum WHO target product profile for a next-generation sputum-based moderate complexity DST with high sensitivity for fluoroquinolones and ethambutol resistance, moderate sensitivity for amikacin resistance, and promise for linezolid resistance, for which more data are needed. Improved MTBC detection would reduce missed resistance.

Expanding Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra® and LF-LAM testing for diagnosis of tuberculosis among HIV-positive adults admitted to hospitals in Tanzania and Mozambique: a randomized controlled trial (the EXULTANT trial).

INTRODUCTION: Tuberculosis (TB) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality among people living with HIV (PLHIV). Current WHO-recommended strategies for diagnosing TB among hospitalized PLHIV rely on symptom screening and disease severity to assess eligibility for urine lipoarabinomannan lateral flow (LF-LAM) and molecular testing. Despite these recommendations, autopsy studies show a large burden of undiagnosed TB among admitted PLHIV. The EXULTANT trial aims to assess the impact of an expanded screening strategy using three specimens (sputum, stool, and urine) for TB diagnosis among PLHIV admitted to hospitals in two high HIV and TB burden African countries. METHODS: This is a multicenter, pragmatic, individually randomized controlled trial conducted across eleven hospitals in Tanzania and Mozambique. Participants in the intervention arm will be tested with Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra® from expectorated sputum, stool, and urine samples, with additional urine LF-LAM testing in the first 24 h after hospital admission, irrespective of the presence of the symptoms. The control arm will implement the WHO standard of care recommendations. Hospitalized adults (≥ 18 years) with a confirmed HIV-diagnosis, irrespective of antiretroviral (ART) therapy status or presence of TB symptoms will be assessed for eligibility at admission. Patients with a pre-existing TB diagnosis, those receiving anti-tuberculosis therapy or tuberculosis preventive treatment in the 6 months prior to enrolment, and those transferred from other hospitals will not be eligible. Also, participants admitted for traumatic reasons such as acute abdomen, maternal conditions, scheduled surgery, having a positive SARS-CoV2 test will be ineligible. The primary endpoint is the proportion of participants with microbiologically confirmed TB starting treatment within 3 days of enrolment. DISCUSSION: The EXULTANT trial investigates rapid implementation after admission of a new diagnostic algorithm using Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra® in several non-invasive specimens, in addition to LF-LAM, in hospitalized PLHIV regardless of TB symptoms. This enhanced strategy is anticipated to detect frequently missed TB cases in this population and is being evaluated as an implementable and scalable intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial reference number: NCT04568967 (ClinicalTrials.gov) registered on 2020-09-29.

Optimal processing of tongue swab samples for Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection by the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay.

Tongue swabs represent a potential alternative to sputum as a sample type for detecting pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) using molecular diagnostic tests. The methods used to process tongue swabs for testing in the WHO-recommended Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) assay vary greatly. We aimed to identify the optimal method for processing diagnostic tongue swabs for subsequent testing by Xpert Ultra. We compared four methods for treating dry tongue swabs with Xpert Ultra sample reagent (SR) mixed with various concentrations of Tris-EDTA-Tween (TET), to treatment with SR alone or to a commonly used SR-free heat-inactivation protocol. In each condition, swabs obtained from volunteers without TB were placed into test buffer spiked with known amounts of Mycobacterium tuberculosis ( Mtb ) strain H37Rv-mc 2 6230. Swabs processed with 1:1 diluted SR buffer had the lowest Mtb limit of detection (LOD) at 22.7 CFU/700 µl (95% CI 14.2-31.2), followed by 2:1 diluted SR buffer at 30.3 CFU/700 µl (95% CI 19.9-40.7), neat SR at 30.9 CFU/700 µl (95% CI 21.5-40.3) and SR prefilled in the Xpert Ultra at 57.1 CFU/700 µl (95% CI 42.4-71.7). Swabs processed using the heat-based protocol had the highest LOD (77.6 CFU/700 µl; 95% CI 51.2-104.0). Similar findings were observed for LOD of RIF-susceptibility. Assay sensitivity using the 2:1 diluted SR buffer did not vary considerably in the presence of sputum matrix or phosphate buffer saline. Further studies are needed to assess the performance of this processing protocol in a clinical setting. Importance: Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) is approved by the World Health Organization for the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB). This test is typically performed using sputum specimens obtained from people with presumptive TB. In order to inactivate Mtb and aid liquefaction, sputum must be mixed with Xpert SR prior to transfer into the Xpert Ultra. However, some people under evaluation for TB are unable to produce sputum. Alternative sample types for TB diagnosis would therefore be of value. Oral-swabs, including tongue-swabs have shown promise, but there are technical challenges associated with sample processing. In this study, several new tongue swab processing conditions were evaluated, utilizing SR, either neat or diluted in buffer. The ability of Xpert Ultra to detect TB was improved under these conditions compared with the previously published heat-processing method (1-3), processing steps were simplified, and technical challenges were overcome.

In-home TB Testing Using GeneXpert Edge is Acceptable, Feasible, and Improves the Proportion of Symptomatic Household Contacts Tested for TB: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Background: Household contact investigations are effective for finding tuberculosis (TB) cases but are hindered by low referral uptake for clinic-based evaluation and testing. We assessed the acceptability and feasibility of in-home testing of household contacts (HHC) using the GeneXpert Edge platform. Methods: We conducted a 2-arm, randomized study in Eastern Cape, South Africa. HHCs were verbally assessed using the World Health Organization-recommended 4-symptom screen. Households with ≥1 eligible symptomatic contact were randomized. Intervention households received in-home GeneXpert MTB/RIF molecular testing. GeneXpert-positive HHCs were referred for clinic-based treatment. Standard-of-care households were referred for clinic-based sputum collection and testing. We defined acceptability as agreeing to in-home testing and feasibility as generation of valid Xpert MTB/RIF results. The proportion and timeliness of test results received was compared between groups. Results: Eighty-four households were randomized (n = 42 per arm). Of 100 eligible HHCs identified, 98/100 (98%) provided consent. Of 51 HHCs allocated to the intervention arm, all accepted in-home testing; of those, 24/51 (47%) were sputum productive and 23/24 (96%) received their test results. Of 47 HCCs allocated to standard-of-care, 7 (15%) presented for clinic-based TB evaluation, 6/47 (13%) were tested, and 4/6 (67%) returned for their results. The median (interquartile range) number of days from screening to receiving test results was 0 (0) and 16.5 (11-15) in the intervention and standard-of-care arms, respectively. Conclusions: In-home testing for TB was acceptable, feasible, and increased HHCs with a molecular test result. In-home testing mitigates a major limitation of household contact investigations (dependency on clinic-based referral), revealing new strategies for enhancing early case detection.

A Quality Initiative to Prioritize Enteral Feeding in Bronchiolitis.

Introduction: Recent studies have identified enteral feeding as a safe alternative to intravenous fluid hydration for inpatients with bronchiolitis receiving respiratory support. Specifically, it can improve vital signs, shorten time on high-flow nasal cannula, and is associated with reduced length of stay. We aimed to increase the percentage of patients receiving enteral feeding on admission with mild-to-moderate bronchiolitis, including those on high-flow nasal cannula, from 83% to 95% within 6 months. Methods: A multidisciplinary quality improvement team identified key drivers preventing enteral feeding as lack of standardization, perception of aspiration risk, and lack of familiarity with feeding orders. PDSA cycles focused on developing and implementing a bronchiolitis clinical practice pathway with an embedded guideline and order set as decision support to prioritize enteral feeding. Additionally, educational sessions were provided for trainees and attendings who were impacted by this pathway. Results: Following interventions, initiation of enteral feeding increased (83%-96%). Additionally, intravenous line placement decreased (37%-12%) with a mirrored increase in nasogastric tube placement (4%-21%). This was associated with a shorter overall length of stay and no increased transfer rate to intensive care. Conclusions: Using quality improvement methodology to standardize enteral feeding and hydration increased the initiation rate of enteral feeding in patients admitted with bronchiolitis. These changes were seen immediately after the implementation of the clinical pathway and sustained throughout the bronchiolitis season.

Accuracy of cobas MTB and MTB-RIF/INH for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Drug Resistance.

This study evaluated the performance of cobas MTB and cobas MTB-RIF/INH for the diagnosis of tuberculosis and detection of rifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH) resistance. Adults presenting with pulmonary tuberculosis symptoms were recruited in South Africa, Moldova, and India. Performance of cobas MTB was assessed against culture, whereas cobas MTB-RIF/INH was assessed using phenotypic drug susceptibility testing and whole-genome sequencing as composite reference standards. Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) or Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra) was used as a comparator. The overall sensitivity and specificity of cobas MTB were 95% (95% CI, 93%-96%) and 96% (95% CI, 95%-97%). Among smear-negatives, the sensitivity of cobas MTB was 75% (95% CI, 66%-83%). Among participants tested with both cobas MTB and Xpert, sensitivity was 96% (95% CI, 94%-97%) for cobas MTB and 95% (95% CI, 93%-97%) for Xpert. Among participants tested with both cobas MTB and Ultra, sensitivity was 88% (95% CI, 81%-92%) for cobas MTB and 89% (95% CI, 83%-93%) for Ultra. Sensitivity and specificity of cobas MTB-RIF/INH for RIF and INH detection were 90% (95% CI, 84%-94%) and 100% (95% CI, 99%-100%), and 89% (95% CI, 84%-93%) and 99.5% (95% CI, 98%-100%), respectively. The cobas MTB and cobas MTB-RIF/INH assays exhibited high performance in a diverse population and present a suitable option for molecular detection of tuberculosis and RIF and INH resistance.

Transcriptomic signatures of progression to TB disease among close contacts in Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 5% of people infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis progress to tuberculosis (TB) disease without preventive therapy. There is a need for a prognostic test to identify those at highest risk of incident TB, so that therapy can be targeted. We evaluated host blood transcriptomic signatures for progression to TB disease. METHODS: Close contacts (≥4 hours exposure per week) of adult patients with culture-confirmed pulmonary TB were enrolled in Brazil. Investigation for incident, microbiologically-confirmed or clinically-diagnosed pulmonary or extra-pulmonary TB disease through 24 months of follow-up was symptom-triggered. Twenty previously validated blood TB transcriptomic signatures were measured at baseline by real-time quantitative PCR. Prognostic performance for incident TB was tested using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis at 6, 9, 12, and 24 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Between June 2015 and June 2019, 1,854 close contacts were enrolled; Twenty-five progressed to incident TB, of whom 13 had microbiologically-confirmed disease. Baseline transcriptomic signature scores were measured in 1,789 close contacts. Prognostic performance for all signatures was best within 6 months of diagnosis. Seven signatures (Gliddon4, Suliman4, Roe3, Roe1, Penn-Nicholson6, Francisco2, and Rajan5) met the minimum World Health Organization target product profile (TPP) for a prognostic test through 6 months; three (Gliddon4, Rajan5, and Duffy9) through 9 months. None met the TPP threshold through 12 or more months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Blood transcriptomic signatures may be useful for predicting TB risk within 9 months of measurement among TB-exposed contacts, to target preventive therapy administration.

Diagnostic accuracy of tongue swab testing on two automated tuberculosis diagnostic platforms, Cepheid Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra and Molbio Truenat MTB Ultima.

Tongue dorsum swabbing is a potential alternative to sputum collection for tuberculosis (TB) testing. Previous studies showed that Cepheid Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) can detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA on tongue swabs stored in buffer, with 72% sensitivity and 100% specificity relative to a sputum microbiological reference standard (sputum MRS). The present study evaluated a more convenient sample collection protocol (dry swab storage), combined with streamlined sample processing protocols, for evaluating two commercial TB diagnostic tests: Xpert Ultra and Molbio Truenat MTB Ultima (MTB Ultima). Copan FLOQSwabs were self-collected or collected by study workers from 321 participants in Western Cape, South Africa. All participants had symptoms suggestive of TB, and 245 of them had sputum MRS-confirmed TB (by sputum MGIT culture and/or Xpert Ultra). One tongue swab per participant was tested on Xpert Ultra, and another tongue swab was tested with MTB Ultima. Xpert Ultra was 75.5% sensitive and 100% specific relative to sputum MRS, similar to previous methods that used swabs stored in buffer. MTB Ultima was 71.6% sensitive and 96.9% specific relative to sputum MRS. When sample lysates that were false-negative or invalid by MTB Ultima were frozen, thawed, and re-tested, MTB Ultima sensitivity rose to 79.1%. Both tests were more sensitive with swabs from participants with higher sputum Xpert Ultra semi-quantitative results. Although additional development could improve diagnostic accuracy, these results further support tongue swabs as easy-to-collect samples for TB testing. IMPORTANCE: Tongue dorsum swabbing is a promising alternative to sputum collection for tuberculosis (TB) testing. Our results lend further support for tongue swabs as exceptionally easy-to-collect samples for high-throughput TB testing.

Tongue swab testing on two automated tuberculosis diagnostic platforms, Cepheid Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra and Molbio Truenat® MTB Ultima.

Tongue dorsum swabbing is a potential alternative to sputum collection for tuberculosis (TB) testing. Previous studies showed that Cepheid Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) can detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) DNA in tongue swabs stored in buffer, with 72% sensitivity and 100% specificity relative to a sputum microbiological reference standard (sputum MRS). The present study evaluated a more convenient sample collection protocol (dry swab storage), combined with streamlined sample processing protocols, for side-by-side analysis using two commercial TB diagnostic tests: Xpert Ultra and Molbio Truenat® MTB Ultima (MTB Ultima). Copan FLOQSwabs were self-collected, or collected by study workers, from 321 participants in Western Cape, South Africa. All participants had symptoms suggestive of TB, and 245 of them had sputum MRS-confirmed TB (by sputum culture and/or Xpert Ultra). One tongue swab per participant was tested on Xpert Ultra and another tongue swab was tested with MTB Ultima. Xpert Ultra was 75.4% sensitive and 100% specific, and MTB Ultima was 71.6% sensitive and 96.9% specific, relative to sputum MRS. When sample lysates that were false-negative by MTB Ultima were frozen, thawed, and re-tested, MTB Ultima sensitivity rose to 79.1%. Both tests were more sensitive with swabs from participants with higher sputum Xpert semi-quantitative results. The protocol for Xpert Ultra enabled fast and easy testing of dry-stored swabs with no loss of accuracy relative to previous methods. MTB Ultima testing of dry-stored swabs exhibited comparable performance to Xpert Ultra. These results further support tongue swabs as easy-to-collect samples for high-throughput TB testing.

Field evaluation of a point-of-care triage test for active tuberculosis (TriageTB).

BACKGROUND: To improve tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis, the World Health Organisation (WHO) has called for a non-sputum based triage test to focus TB testing on people with a high likelihood of having active pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). Various host or pathogen biomarker-based testing devices are in design stage and require validity assessment. Host biomarkers have shown promise to accurately rule out active TB, but further research is required to determine generalisability. The TriageTB diagnostic test study aims to assess the accuracy of diagnostic test candidates, as well as field-test, finalise the design and biomarker signature, and validate a point-of-care multi-biomarker test (MBT). METHODS: This observational diagnostic study will evaluate sensitivity and specificity of biomarker-based diagnostic candidates including the MBT and Xpert® TB Fingerstick cartridge compared with a gold-standard composite TB outcome classification defined by symptoms, sputum GeneXpert® Ultra, smear and culture, radiological features, response to TB therapy and presence of an alternative diagnosis. The study will be conducted in research sites in South Africa, Uganda, The Gambia and Vietnam which all have high TB prevalence. The two-phase design allows for finalisation of the MBT in Phase 1 in which candidate host proteins will be evaluated on stored serum from Asia, South Africa and South America and on fingerstick blood from 50 newly recruited participants per site. The MBT test will then be locked down and validated in Phase 2 on 250 participants per site. DISCUSSION: By targeting confirmatory TB testing to those with a positive triage test, 75% of negative GXPU may be avoided, thereby reducing diagnostic costs and patient losses during the care cascade. This study builds on previous biomarker research and aims to identify a point-of-care test meeting or exceeding the minimum World Health Organisation target product profile of a 90% sensitivity and 70% specificity. Streamlining TB testing by identifying individuals with a high likelihood of TB should improve TB resources use and, in so doing, improve TB care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04232618 (clinicaltrials.gov) Date of registration: 16 January 2020.

Diagnostic accuracy of the NOVA Tuberculosis Total Antibody Rapid test for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Background: The NOVA Tuberculosis Total Antibody Rapid Test is a commercially available lateral flow serological assay that is intended to be used as an aid in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. We conducted a study to estimate diagnostic accuracy of this assay for diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis disease and for detection of M. tuberculosis infection. Methods: This study used existing frozen plasma specimens that had been obtained previously from consenting HIV-negative adults in Cambodia, South Africa, and Vietnam whose tuberculosis status was rigorously characterized using sputum mycobacterial cultures and blood interferon gamma release assay. The investigational assay was performed in a single laboratory by laboratory staff specifically trained to conduct the assays according to the manufacturer's procedures. In addition, intensity of the test band was subjectively assessed. Results: Plasma specimens from 150 participants were tested. All testing attempts yielded a determinate result of either positive or negative. For diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis disease, test sensitivity and specificity were 40.0 % (20/50, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 27.6 % to 53.8 %) and 85.0 % (95 % CI 76.7 % to 90.7 %), respectively. For detection of M. tuberculosis infection, test sensitivity and specificity were 28.0 % (95 % CI 20.5 % to 37.2 %) and 86.0 % (95 % CI 73.8 % to 93.0 %), respectively. Among the 35 positive tests, no statistically significant band intensity trend was found across participant groups (p = 0.17). Conclusion: Study findings do not support a role for the NOVA Tuberculosis Test in current tuberculosis diagnostic algorithms.

Are mRNA based transcriptomic signatures ready for diagnosing tuberculosis in the clinic? - A review of evidence and the technological landscape.

Advances in discovery and validation of diagnostic, prognostic and treatment-monitoring transcriptomic signatures of tuberculosis (TB) disease could accelerate the goal to end TB. We conducted a review to evaluate whether mRNA transcriptomics technologies are sufficiently mature to develop accurate next-generation TB diagnostic tests. Early studies tended to be limited in sample size, diversity of population groups, sample collection and processing methods, while recent prospective studies have addressed these limitations. Some of the existing signatures could be used for triage; however, high cost and complexity could limit their use. For a confirmatory test, setting an optimal cut-off to maintain specificity across populations and settings is a challenge. mRNA signatures have shown the potential to quantitatively monitor response to treatment. No prognostic signatures can accurately predict progression to active TB over 2 years while short term prediction is possible. The management strategy should be defined for individuals with positive prognostic tests. FUNDING: Development of this manuscript was supported by funding received from the Stop TB Partnership and USAID for the New Diagnostics Working Group. The funders had no role in paper design, article selection and review, interpretation, or writing of the paper.

Documentation from trained medical students has a low rate of relative downcoding for emergency medicine encounters.

Background: Since 2018, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines have allowed teaching physicians to bill for evaluation and management services based on medical student documentation. Limited previous data suggest that medical student documentation suffers from a high rate of downcoding relative to faculty documentation. We sought to compare the coding outcomes of documentation performed by medical students, and not edited by faculty, with documentation edited and submitted by faculty. Methods: A total of 104 randomly selected notes from real patient encounters written by senior medical students were compared to the revised notes submitted by faculty. The note pairs were then split and reviewed by blinded professional coders and assigned level of service (LoS) codes 1-5 (corresponding to E&M CPT codes 99281-99285). Results: We found that the LoS agreement between student and faculty note versions was 63%, with 23% of all student notes receiving lower LoS compared to faculty notes (downcoded). This was found to be similar to baseline variability in professional coder LoS designations. Conclusions: Notes from medical students who have completed a focused documentation curriculum have less LoS downcoding than in previous reports.

Evaluation of a transcriptomic signature of tuberculosis risk in combination with an interferon gamma release assay: A diagnostic test accuracy study.

Background: We evaluated the diagnostic and prognostic performance of a transcriptomic signature of tuberculosis (TB) risk (RISK11) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold-plus (QFTPlus) as combination biomarkers of TB risk. Methods: Healthy South Africans who were HIV-negative aged 18-60 years with baseline RISK11 and QFTPlus results were evaluated in a prospective cohort study conducted between Sept 20, 2016 and Dec 20, 2019. Prevalence and incidence-rate ratios were used to evaluate risk of TB. Positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratios were used to compare individual tests versus Both-Positive (RISK11+/QFTPlus+) and Either-Positive (RISK11+ or QFTPlus+) combinations. Findings: Among 2912 participants, prevalent TB in RISK11+/QFTPlus+ participants was 13·3-fold (95% CI 4·2-42·7) higher than RISK11-/QFTPlus-; 2·4-fold (95% CI 1·2-4·8) higher than RISK11+/QFTPlus-; and 4·5-fold (95% CI 2·5-8·0) higher than RISK11-/QFTPlus+ participants. Risk of incident TB in RISK11+/QFTPlus+ participants was 8·3-fold (95% CI 2·5-27·0) higher than RISK11-/QFTPlus-; 2·5-fold (95% CI 1·0-6·6) higher than RISK11+/QFTPlus-; and 2·1-fold (95% CI 1·2-3·4) higher than RISK11-/QFTPlus+ participants, respectively. Compared to QFTPlus, the Both-Positive test combination increased diagnostic LR+ from 1·3 (95% CI 1·2-1·5) to 4·7 (95% CI 3·2-7·0), and prognostic LR+ from 1·4 (95% CI 1·2-1·5) to 2·8 (95% CI 1·5-5·1), but did not improve upon RISK11 alone. Compared with RISK11, the Either-Positive test combination decreased diagnostic LR- from 0·7 (95% CI 0·6-0·9) to 0·3 (95% CI 0·2-0·6), and prognostic LR- from 0·9 (95% CI 0·8-1·0) to 0·3 (0·1-0·7), but did not improve upon QFTPlus alone. Interpretation: Combining two tests such as RISK11 and QFTPlus, with discordant individual performance characteristics does not improve overall discriminatory performance, relative to the individual tests. Funding: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, South African Medical Research Council.

Host transcriptomic signatures of tuberculosis can predict immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in HIV patients.

Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) can be a complication of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in patients with advanced HIV, but its pathogenesis is uncertain. In tuberculosis (TB) endemic countries, IRIS is often associated with mycobacterial infections or Bacille-Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination in children. With no predictive or confirmatory tests at present, IRIS remains a diagnosis of exclusion. We tested whether RISK6 and Sweeney3, validated immune-based blood transcriptomic signatures for TB, could predict or diagnose IRIS in HIV+ children and adults. Transcripts were measured by RT-qPCR in BCG-vaccinated children and by microarray in HIV+ adults with TB including TB meningitis (TBM). Signature scores before ART initiation and up to IRIS diagnosis were compared between participants who did or did not develop IRIS. In children, RISK6 and Sweeney3 discriminated IRIS cases from non-IRIS controls before ART, and at diagnosis. In adults with TB, RISK6 discriminated IRIS cases from controls after half-week on ART and at TB-IRIS onset. In adults with TBM, only Sweeney3 discriminated IRIS cases from controls before ART, while both signatures distinguished cases from controls at TB-IRIS onset. Parsimonious whole blood transcriptomic signatures for TB showed potential to predict and diagnose IRIS in HIV+ children and adults.

Targeted Gene Expression Profiling of Human Myeloid Cells From Blood and Lung Compartments of Patients With Tuberculosis and Other Lung Diseases.

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) have been identified in the peripheral blood and granulomas of patients with active TB disease, but their phenotype-, function-, and immunosuppressive mechanism- spectrum remains unclear. Importantly, the frequency and signaling pathways of MDSC at the site of disease is unknown with no indication how this compares to MDSC identified in peripheral blood or to those of related myeloid counterparts such as alveolar macrophages and monocytes. Most phenotypic and functional markers have been described in oncological studies but have not yet been validated in TB. Using a panel of 43 genes selected from pathways previously shown to contribute to tumor-derived MDSC, we set out to evaluate if the expression of these additional functional markers and properties may also be relevant to TB-derived MDSC. Differential expression was investigated between MDSC, alveolar macrophages and monocytes enriched from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and peripheral blood of patients with active TB, patients with other lung diseases (OLD). Results demonstrated that anatomical compartments may drive compartment-specific immunological responses and subsequent MDSC immunosuppressive functions, demonstrated by the observation that MDSC and/or monocytes from PB alone can discriminate, via hierarchical clustering, between patients with active TB disease and OLD. Our data show that the gene expression patterns of MDSC in peripheral blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid do not cluster according to disease states (TB vs OLD). This suggests that MDSC from TB patients may display similar gene expression profiles to those found for MDSC in cancer, but this needs to be validated in a larger cohort. These are important observations for TB research and may provide direction for future studies aimed at repurposing and validating cancer immunotherapies for use in TB.

Prospective multicentre head-to-head validation of host blood transcriptomic biomarkers for pulmonary tuberculosis by real-time PCR.

Background: Sensitive point-of-care screening tests are urgently needed to identify individuals at highest risk of tuberculosis. We prospectively tested performance of host-blood transcriptomic tuberculosis signatures. Methods: Adults without suspicion of tuberculosis were recruited from five endemic South African communities. Eight parsimonious host-blood transcriptomic tuberculosis signatures were measured by microfluidic RT-qPCR at enrolment. Upper respiratory swab specimens were tested with a multiplex bacterial-viral RT-qPCR panel in a subset of participants. Diagnostic and prognostic performance for microbiologically confirmed prevalent and incident pulmonary tuberculosis was tested in all participants at baseline and during active surveillance through 15 months follow-up, respectively. Results: Among 20,207 HIV-uninfected and 963 HIV-infected adults screened; 2923 and 861 were enroled. There were 61 HIV-uninfected (weighted prevalence 1.1%) and 10 HIV-infected (prevalence 1.2%) tuberculosis cases at baseline. Parsimonious signature diagnostic performance was superior among symptomatic (AUCs 0.85-0.98) as compared to asymptomatic (AUCs 0.61-0.78) HIV-uninfected participants. Thereafter, 24 HIV-uninfected and 9 HIV-infected participants progressed to incident tuberculosis (1.1 and 1.0 per 100 person-years, respectively). Among HIV-uninfected individuals, prognostic performance for incident tuberculosis occurring within 6-12 months was higher relative to 15 months. 1000 HIV-uninfected participants were tested for respiratory microorganisms and 413 HIV-infected for HIV plasma viral load; 7/8 signature scores were higher (p < 0.05) in participants with viral respiratory infections or detectable HIV viraemia than those without. Conclusions: Several parsimonious tuberculosis transcriptomic signatures met triage test targets among symptomatic participants, and incipient test targets within 6 months. However, the signatures were upregulated with viral infection and offered poor specificity for diagnosing sub-clinical tuberculosis.