Nursing workforce, education, and training challenges to implementing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation services in Australian intensive care units: A qualitative substudy.

BACKGROUND: The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasing in the management of critical care patients. ECMO service delivery requires an organisation-supported approach to ensure appropriate resources to deliver training, equipment, capacity, staffing, and the required model of care for quality care delivery. The aim of this nested substudy was to explore challenges specific to nursing staff in ECMO services in Australian intensive care units. METHODS: This was a nested substudy within a qualitative study using semistructured focus group discussions conducted with 83 health professionals, which included 40 nurses. There were 14 focus groups across 14 ECMO centres participating in the binational ECMO (EXCEL) registry of Australia and New Zealand. An inductive thematic analysis focused on the nurse's experiences of the barriers and facilitators for nursing in providing an ECMO service. RESULTS: Four themes emerged relating to the nurse's experience of implementing ECMO services: workforce requirements, workload demands, models of care, and level of experience. The complexity and intensity of caring for ECMO patients may need to be considered an additional factor in the burnout in critical care nurses. Current nursing ratios and responsibilities in critical care need to be considered, with the opportunity for the development of specialist advanced practitioner nursing roles. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the challenges for nursing in providing ECMO services in the intensive care setting. The complexity and intensity of ECMO is challenging and leads to concerns regarding burnout and workforce preparedness. New models of care need to be considered to mitigate the barriers for nursing identified across ECMO centres.

The perceived barriers and facilitators to implementation of early mobilisation within a multicentre, phase 3 randomised controlled trial: A qualitative process evaluation study.

BACKGROUND: Process evaluation within clinical trials provides an assessment of the study implementation's accuracy and quality to explain causal mechanisms and highlight contextual factors associated with variation in outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators of implementing early mobilisation (EM) within a trial. METHODS: This is a qualitative process evaluation study within the Trial of Early Activity and Mobilisation (TEAM) phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Semistructured interviews were conducted remotely with multiprofessional clinicians (physiotherapists, medical staff, and nursing staff) involved in the delivery of the TEAM intervention at Australian hospitals participating in the TEAM study. Inductive coding was used to establish themes which were categorised into the Behaviour system involving domains of Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation (COM-B), which allowed barriers and enablers affecting EM to be identified. FINDINGS: Semistructured interviews were conducted in three different states of Australia. There were 16 participants, including 10 physiotherapists, five physicians, and one nurse. The key themes that facilitated EM were mentoring, champions, additional staff, organisation of the environment, cultural changes, communication, and documented safety criteria. In contrast, the main factors that hindered EM were lack of expertise and confidence in delivering EM, heavy sedation, interdisciplinary conflicts, and perceived risks related to EM. CONCLUSION: A wide range of barriers and facilitators that influenced EM within the TEAM study were identified using the COM-B framework. Many of these have been previously identified in the literature; however, participation in the study was viewed positively by multidisciplinary team members.

Observational study of the incidence and factors associated with patient readmission from home-based care under the Hospital in the Home programme.

BACKGROUND: Hospital in the Home (HITH) provides home-based care by hospital staff, which reduces inpatient length of stay and promotes a better quality of life. The frequency and precipitants for readmission from HITH back to the acute inpatient service are currently poorly defined. AIMS: To determine the incidence of hospital readmissions and risk factors for readmissions in a HITH programme of a large hospital network. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to a large HITH service within a hospital network in Victoria, Australia, from 1 July to 30 September 2017. We used logistic regression to determine if patient characteristics or specific clinical factors were associated with hospital readmission. RESULTS: In a cohort of 605 patients under HITH, 72 were readmitted (incidence 11.9%). The median duration under HITH prior to readmission was 7 days (interquartile range, 3-23 days). Most readmissions were due to treatment failure, an associated complication or new clinical problem. In the univariable analysis, older age, direct admission from the emergency department (ED), recent intensive care admission, high Charlson comorbidity index, advanced chronic kidney disease, negative pressure wound therapy and use of antihypertensives were factors associated with readmission. In the multivariable analysis, the variables independently associated with readmissions were the Charlson comorbidity index (odds ratio, OR 1.17, 95% CI: 1.08-1.25) and referrals from the ED (OR 0.18, 95% CI: 0.06-0.58). CONCLUSIONS: Older age and greater comorbidity increased the odds of readmission, but patients from the ED were low risk compared to inpatient referrals.