High prevalence of spontaneous portal-systemic shunts in persistent hepatic encephalopathy: a case-control study.

Large spontaneous portal-systemic shunts have been occasionally described in patients with cirrhosis. This study was undertaken to assess the prevalence of portal-systemic shunts in patients with cirrhosis with recurrent or persistent hepatic encephalopathy (HE) as compared with patients with cirrhosis without HE. Fourteen patients with cirrhosis with recurrent or persistent HE (cases) and 14 patients with cirrhosis without previous or present signs of overt HE matching for age and degree of liver failure (controls) were studied. Each patient underwent neurological assessment and cerebral magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to exclude organic neurological pathological conditions. HE evaluation included psychometric performance (Trail-Making Test A), electroencephalogram (EEG), mental status examination and grading, arterial, venous, and partial pressure of ammonia determination. The presence of portal-systemic shunts was assessed by portal venous phase multidetector-row spiral computed tomography (CT). Large spontaneous portal-systemic shunts were detected in 10 patients with HE and in only 2 patients without HE (71% vs. 14%; chi square = 9.16; df = 1.0; P = .002). The patients with HE presented ascites (P = .002) and medium/large esophageal varices (P = .02) less frequently than the control group. In conclusion, our study suggests that large spontaneous shunts may often sustain the chronicity of HE; the presence of large shunts should be sought in patients with cirrhosis with recurrent or persistent HE.

Validation of automated blood cell counter for the determination of polymorphonuclear cell count in the ascitic fluid of cirrhotic patients with or without spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

OBJECTIVES: Polymorphonuclear (PMN) cell count in ascitic fluid is the most useful test for the diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). We evaluated the validity of an automated blood cell counter for the PMN determination in ascitic fluid by comparing it with the traditional hematologic method with a light microscope in a manual counting chamber. METHODS: A total of 130 ascitic fluid samples were collected from 74 consecutive cirrhotics. The agreement between the two techniques was assessed according to Bland and Altman's method. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the automated blood cell counter were calculated by considering the diagnosis of SBP as a PMN count > or = 250 cells/mm(3), determined by the manual method as the "gold standard." RESULTS: The mean PMN counts assessed by the manual method and the automated blood cell counter were 124 +/- 301 cells/mm(3) and 130 +/- 339 cells/mm(3), respectively (p = 0.89, ns). The mean +/- SD of the difference between manual and automated measurements was 6 +/- 61 cells/mm(3), whereas the limits of agreement were +127 cells/mm(3) (95% CI = +108 to +147) and -115 cells/mm(3) (95%CI = -96 to -135). SBP was diagnosed in 11 patients. All but one were correctly identified with the automated blood cell counter, with a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 100%; positive and negative predictive values were 100% and 99.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The manual method and the automated blood cell counter have a good agreement in the PMN determination in ascitic fluid, and the automated blood cell counter is a reliable tool for rapid diagnosis of SBP.

Role of determination of partial pressure of ammonia in cirrhotic patients with and without hepatic encephalopathy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare venous, arterial and partial pressure of ammonia (pNH(3)) in 27 consecutive cirrhotics with hepatic encephalopathy, 15 cirrhotics without hepatic encephalopathy and nine controls; to reevaluate all parameters after the improvement of encephalopathy. METHODS: Patients were studied by clinical examination and psychometric testing. pNH(3) was calculated from arterial ammonia and pH. RESULTS: In patients with encephalopathy, each form of ammonia was higher than in both controls and patients without encephalopathy. The correlation with the severity of hepatic encephalopathy was similar for venous (r=0.72), arterial ammonia (r=0.76) and pNH(3) (r=0.75). The sensitivity and specificity of each variable in correctly classifying the patients as having or not having hepatic encephalopathy was also similar. Each form of ammonia decreased after the resolution or amelioration of symptoms. However, even in the 17 patients with complete resolution of hepatic encephalopathy, all three ammonia determinations resulted unchanged or increased in some patients. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the significant correlation between pNH(3) and hepatic encephalopathy, our study suggests that neither pNH(3) nor arterial ammonia are, from a clinical point of view, more useful than venous ammonia: all three determinations being limited both for the diagnosis of hepatic encephalopathy and for the clinical management of the patients.

Effect of blood ammonia elevation following oral glutamine load on the psychometric performance of cirrhotic patients.

Oral glutamine challenge is a method to increase blood ammonia and may be used to study the ammonia lowering effect of drugs potentially useful in hepatic encephalopathy (HE). We tested its influence on the psychometric performance of 18 cirrhotic patients without HE. Twelve nonencephalopatic cirrhotic patients were studied before and after glutamine load (20 g in 100 mL tap water) and six patients before and after placebo (100 mL tap water) by using the Number Connection Test (NCT), the Covert Visual Attention Orienting Test (CVAOT), and the Scan Test (SCT). Blood ammonia increased significantly after glutamine (from 79 +/- 34 to 211 +/- 66 microg/dL) but not after placebo (from 94 +/- 41 to 88 +/- 26). No difference in the NCT was found before and after glutamine load or placebo. The CVAOT was similar after glutamine challenge and placebo, nor any interaction between Loads (glutamine or placebo) x Cue position was found, suggesting that glutamine load did not influence attention-orienting. SCT results were also similar after glutamine and placebo, suggesting a lack of influence on the working memory. Glutamine challenge is a safe method to induce hyperammonemia in nonencephalopatic cirrhotic patients and, therefore, to study the efficacy of ammonia lowering treatments.