Predictors of colonization with Staphylococcus species among patients scheduled for cardiac and orthopedic interventions at tertiary care hospitals in north-eastern Germany-a prevalence screening study.

As methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization and infection in humans are a global challenge. In Mecklenburg and Western Pomerania (Germany) 1,517 patients who underwent surgical interventions were systematically screened for MRSA and MSSA colonization on the day of hospital admission and discharge. Demographic data, risk factors and colonization status of the (i) nose, (ii) throat, (iii) groin, and (iv) thorax or site of surgical intervention were determined. Of the 1,433 patients who were included for further evaluation, 331 (23.1%) were colonized with MSSA, while only 17 (1.2%) were MRSA carriers on the day of hospital admission. A combination of nose, throat and groin swabs returned a detection rate of 98.3% for MSSA/MRSA. Trauma patients had lower prevalence of MRSA/MSSA (OR 0.524, 95% CI: 0.37-0.75; p < 0.001) than patients with intended orthopedic interventions. Males showed significantly higher nasal S. aureus carrier rates than females (odds ratio (OR) = 1.478; 95% CI: 1.14-1.92; p = 0.003). Nasal S. aureus colonization was less frequent among male smokers as compared to non-smokers (chi2 = 16.801; phi = 0.154; p < 0.001). Age, gender and smoking had a significant influence on S. aureus colonization. Combining at least three different swabbing sites should be considered for standard screening procedure to determine S. aureus colonization at patients scheduled for cardiac or orthopedic interventions at tertiary care hospitals.

Corrigendum to: 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases.

Corrigendum to: 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases [Eur Heart Journal (2014) 35, 2873­2926,doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281]. In Table 3, the radiation for MRI is "0" and not "-". The corrected table is shown below.

Guideline-adherent therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The EPICOR registry in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Representative data on the current management of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are of high interest. The EPICOR registry aimed to prospectively collect such real-life data with particular focus on antithrombotic drug utilization and outcomes. METHODS: As part of the international prospective EPICOR registry, 29 hospitals in Germany documented 296 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)-ACS and 333 with unstable angina or non-STEMI (NSTEMI)-ACS surviving the hospital phase. The statistical analysis was performed in a descriptive manner. The ClinicalTrials.gov identifier is NCT01171404. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 62 ± 13 years, and 77.4 % were men. Treatment with antithrombotic agents was initiated in the prehospital phase in 50.7 % of STEMI and 33.3 % of NSTEMI patients. During the hospital stay (median 7.0 days), cardiac catheterization was performed in 97.6 %, percutaneous coronary intervention in 85.6 %, thrombolysis in 4.6 %, and coronary bypass surgery in 2.7 % patients. The use of acetylic salicylic acid (ASA) was reported in 95.6 % vs. 96.1 %, clopidogrel in 60.8 % vs. 73.0 %, prasugrel in 45.6 % vs. 22.5 %, any GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor in 52.4 % vs. 18.9 % [any dual combination of ASA+(clopidogrel/prasugrel)in 94.0 vs. 91.0 %], statins in 94.6 % vs. 92.2 %, beta blockers in 96.3 % vs. 94.6 %, and ACE-I/ARB in 91.6 % vs. 87.7 % of STEMI vs. NSTEMI patients, respectively. Combined use of the five drug classes recommended in the guidelines-ASA, P2Y12 antagonists, statin, beta blocker, and ACE-I/ARB-was reported in 81.1 % vs. 69.4 % of STEMI vs. NSTEMI patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: In Germany a high proportion of patients with ACS are treated according to current guidelines, receiving primary revascularization as well as antithrombotic drugs and other agents for prevention of secondary events; associated bleeding complications were less frequent as compared with published registries.

Interventional treatment strategies of thoracic aortic pathologies.

Chronic and acute diseases of the thoracic aorta, including aortic dissection and aortic aneurysm are attracting increasing attention both in the light of an ageing Western and Oriental population and with the proliferation of modern diagnostic imaging modalities. While classical surgical strategies still dominate the care for acute and chronic pathology of the ascending aorta and the proximal arch region, new endovascular concepts are emerging and are likely to evolve as primary treatment strategies for descending aortic pathology in suitable patients constituting the majority of cases. Additionally, aortic arch pathologies are becoming the target of hybrid approaches combining surgical head-vessel debranching and interventional stent-graft implantation in the attempt to improve outcome by avoiding the high risk of open arch repair or complete replacement. Nonetheless, due to the complexity of the underlying vascular disease, every patient should be discussed in a team consisting of cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, anaesthesiologists and radiologists and an individualized therapeutic strategy should be carried out in a center with experience in both endovascular and surgical procedures.

[Optical coherence tomography of coronary arteries--a novel intravascular imaging modality]. / Optische Kohärenztomographie der Koronararterien.

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is the latest intravascular imaging modality for the investigation of coronary arteries. It can be used in patients with stable coronary artery disease as well as in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Its almost microscope-like resolution of 10-20 µm (10-times greater than intravascular ultrasound) gives us the most detailed insight into the coronary artery wall in vivo so far.Optical coherence tomography can be used for accurate qualitative and quantitative assessment of stenoses in stable coronary artery disease and accurate guidance of percutaneous coronary interventions as well as accurate postprocedural control. In patients with acute coronary syndrome it can be used for the detection of culprit of the culprit lesion (vulnerable plaque) which allows the operator to cover not only angiographically tightest stenosis (angiographic culprit lesion, caused in most cases by thrombus only) but most importantly the vulnerable plaque, which led to the acute event, as well. Furthermore, optical coherence tomography allows accurate assessment of thrombotic burden, stent apposition/malapposition, edge dissections and tissue prolaps or thrombus protrusions throught stent struts, etc.

[Risk evaluation of type B aortic dissection: importance for treatment of acute aortic syndrome]. / Risikoevaluation der Aortendissektion Typ B: Bedeutung für die Behandlung des akuten Aortensyndroms.

Acute aortic syndrome (AAS) is a modern term used to describe interrelated emergency aortic conditions with similar clinical characteristics and challenges including aortic dissection, intramural hematoma (IMH) and penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU). Population-based studies suggest that the incidence of aortic dissection ranges from 2.6 to 3.5 cases per 100,000 inhabitants per year; hypertension and a variety of genetic disorders with altered connective tissue are the most prevalent risk conditions. In general, open surgical repair is recommended when dissection involves the ascending aorta, whereas medical management and endovascular stent graft repair is the best option when the ascending aorta is spared. Pathological conditions involving the aortic arch may be treated using a hybrid approach combining debranching of supra-aortic vessels and stent graft placement. Stent graft-induced remodeling of a dissected aorta seems to have long-term benefits in complicated and so-called uncomplicated type B dissections as almost every case reveals a risk profile and one in eight patients diagnosed with acute type B aortic dissection has either an IMH or a PAU. Pain is the most commonly presenting symptom of AAS and should prompt immediate attention including diagnostic imaging modalities, such as multislice computed tomography, transesophageal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. A specific therapeutic approach is necessary for IMH and PAU because without treatment they have a very poor outcome, are unpredictable in evolution and can be more severe than acute aortic dissection. All patients must receive the best medical treatment available at admission. High-risk but asymptomatic patients with IMH and PAU can probably be monitored without interventions. All symptomatic patients will need treatment. In many of these patients a direct surgical approach is often prohibitive due to age and multiple comorbidities. Endovascular treatment offers superior results and is becoming a recognized indication for such patients. Irrespective of the treatment modality close surveillance is mandatory in order to monitor disease progression.

Bivalirudin use in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Insights from the prospective, multi-centre EUROVISION registry.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of bivalirudin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction has been tested in clinical trials, but its use in a real-world scenario has never been reported. METHODS: From the total number of patients enrolled in the EUROVISION registry, 678 subjects affected by ST-elevation myocardial infarction were selected and included in the analysis. Posology and usage patterns of bivalirudin, as evaluated by dose and time of drug bolus and infusion administered, were evaluated. The 30-day outcome has been assessed by efficacy and safety endpoints. RESULTS: All patients received an initial intravenous bolus of bivalirudin (0.70±0.25 mg/kg) followed by an infusion (1.58±0.47 mg/kg/h; duration: 60 [30, 107] min) in 99.3% of cases. An additional bolus (0.49±0.06 mg/kg) was administered in 9.3% of patients. Bivalirudin infusion was prolonged after procedure in 62.2%. Death occurred in 2.1% of patients, non-fatal myocardial reinfarction in 0.3%, unplanned revascularization in 0.6% and non-fatal stroke in 0.4%. Acute stent thrombosis was not observed. Major bleeding occurred in 1.5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Bivalirudin usage in the setting of primary PCI provided excellent results in terms of 30-day outcome even in a real-world population.

[Pregnancy-related cardiac problems]. / Kardiale Probleme in der Schwangerschaft.

All women of child-bearing age suffering from congenital cardiac valve malformations or acquired valvular disease, pulmonary hypertension or arterial hypertension and who are at risk for coronary heart disease should receive early counseling and optimal treatment before pregnancy. They should be treated by an interdisciplinary team composed of gynecologists, cardiologists, geneticists and, if necessary, cardiac surgeons. This interdisciplinary approach should be used for all pregnant women with cardiac disease in order to minimize maternal and fetal mortality. As physicians will only rarely be confronted with such critically ill patients, guidelines and access to worldwide information from databanks are particularly important (http://www.safetus.com und http://www.emryotox.de).

Risk factors for clinical events at 1-year follow-up after drug-eluting stent implantation: results from the prospective multicenter German DES.DE registry.

BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stents (DES) have substantially reduced target vessel revascularization (TVR) after percutaneous coronary interventions. Risk factors for clinical events need to be redefined with this treatment option. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the prospective DES.DE registry, baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics as well as in-hospital and follow-up events were recorded for all enrolled patients. Between October 2005 and May 2009, 21,774 patients receiving DES were enrolled at 98 DES.DE sites. The composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke defined as major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and TVR were predefined as primary endpoints. At 1-year follow-up rates for overall death, MI, stroke, MACCE, TVR and definite stent thrombosis were 2.7, 3.1, 1.4, 7.1, 11.5 and 0.6 %, respectively. Aside from well-known risk factors like age, diabetes mellitus and triple-vessel disease, stratification in patients with or without MACCE revealed atrial fibrillation, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, renal failure, impaired ejection fraction and peripheral vascular disease as strong predictors of MACCE at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Data collected in the DES.DE registry, reflecting the clinical practice in Germany, revealed favorable clinical outcomes after DES implantation in a real world setting but also identifying several high-risk populations.

Outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents in unprotected left main versus non-left main native coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter German DES.DE registry.

BACKGROUND: Unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease is considered an indication for surgical revascularization. However, refined percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) technology and modern drug-eluting stents (DES) render the ULMCA a target for interventional treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between October 2005 and September 2009, 374 patients receiving DES in ULMCA and 18,678 patients receiving DES in non-left main coronary arteries (nLMCA) with no previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery, were registered at 130 DES.DE sites. The composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke defined as major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) were defined as primary endpoints. Baseline clinical and descriptive morphology of coronary artery disease revealed more comorbidities and more complex anatomies in the ULMCA group. At 1-year follow-up, the ULMCA group suffered from higher rates of overall death (5.6 versus 2.3 %; p < 0.0001), stroke (2.0 versus 0.8 %; p < 0.05), MACCE (8.6 versus 4.9 %; p < 0.01); whereas rates for definite/probable stent thrombosis (2.4 versus 1.6 %; p = 0.29), TVR (14.2 versus 10.8 %; p = 0.06) and MI (1.3 versus 1.9 %; p = 0.44) were not statistically different. These results persisted even after adjustment for different baseline characteristics, except MACCE that was no longer statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Data collected in DES.DE revealed that ULMCA PCI with DES result in similar TVR rates as compared to PCI in nLMCA. Moreover, modern DES have not offset the higher comorbidity index and higher procedure-related complication rate with PCI of ULMCA lesions.

[Stent graft of the thoracic aorta]. / Stentversorgung der thorakalen Aorta.

Considering the demographic changes in our society and the proliferation of imaging-based improved diagnostics, both acute and chronic aortic diseases attract increasing attention and require dedicated care. Cardiac as well as vascular surgery used to represent the gold standards for therapeutic management of pathologies of the ascending aorta and the arch; however, the technological evolution of endoluminal strategies has had a serious impact on the treatment of the descending aorta, the aortic arch in combination with vascular debranching or bypass, and in selected cases even on managing pathologies of the ascending aorta. Although several case series and meta-analyses of published observations hint towards superiority of endografting in comparison to open surgical repair, the affected usually multimorbid patients with highly complex aortic disease should be subjected to an individual evaluation by a team of cardiologists, cardiac and vascular surgeons as well as imaging specialists; a dedicated individualized treatment concept in highly experienced centers of excellence is likely to provide the best results for such challenging patients.

[Aortic dissection]. / Aortendissektion.

Acute aortic syndrome (AAS) is a modern term to describe interrelated emergency aortic conditions with similar clinical characteristics and challenges. These conditions include aortic dissection, intramural haematoma (IMH), and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU and aortic rupture); trauma to the aorta with intimal laceration may also be considered. The common denominator of AAS is disruption of the media layer of the aorta with bleeding within IMH, along the aortic media resulting in separation of the layers of the aorta (dissection), or transmurally through the wall in the case of ruptured PAU or trauma. Population-based studies suggest that the incidence of acute dissection ranges from 2 to 3.5 cases per 100 000 person/year; hypertension and a variety of genetic disorders with altered connective tissues are the most prevalent risk conditions. Patients with AAS often present in a similar fashion, regardless of the underlying condition of dissection, IMH, PAU, or contained aortic rupture. Pain is the most commonly presenting symptom of acute aortic dissection and should prompt immediate attention including diagnostic imaging modalities (such as multislice computed tomography, transoesophageal ultrasound, or magnetic resonance imaging). Prognosis is clearly related to undelayed diagnosis and appropriate surgical repair in the case of proximal involvement of the aorta; affection of distal segments of the aorta may call for individualized therapeutic approaches favouring endovascular in the presence of malperfusion or imminent rupture, or medical management.