Effect of the iridocorneal angle size on the diurnal pressure profile in a glaucoma suspect cohort and patients with glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of the iridocorneal angle size (ICAS) on the diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with suspected glaucoma (SG). METHOD: Patients with any eye-pressure lowering medication or previous ocular surgery were excluded. In a retrospective study set, diurnal IOP profiles of 120 patients (205 eyes) within a 48-h period were analysed by regression analysis. Of those eyes, 44 were diagnosed to have glaucoma. The remaining eyes were used as healthy control group (HCG). RESULTS: The overall mean IOP was 15.63 mmHg ± 2.72 mmHg and mean ICAS was 23.92° ± 4.74°. In the glaucoma cohort, mean IOP was 18.77 ± 1.86 mmHg and mean ICAS was 25.02° ± 4.96°. In the HCG, mean IOP was 14.77 ± 2.25 mmHg and mean ICAS was 23.62° ± 4.64°. In the total cohort, as well as in the subgroups (HCG or glaucoma), regression analysis showed no significant impact even of the minimum ICAS, which was larger than 10°, on average (P = 0.89), maximum (P = 0.88), and range of IOP (P = 0.49) within 48 h. The difference between glaucoma cohort and HCG cohort was significant in terms of IOP (P < 0.001), but not for minimum ICAS (P = 0.07). Chi-square test showed no increase in prevalence of IOP peaks of  > 21 mmHg within 48 h in eyes with an angle between 10° and 20° (P = 0.18). CONCLUSION: An ICAS of larger than 10° in HCG or glaucoma patients with an open-angle does not influence the minimum, average, maximum or range of IOP. Additionally, an angle size larger than 10° does not allow the prediction of IOP changes in these two cohorts.

Determining and Comparing the Effective Lens Position and Refractive Outcome of a Novel Rhexis-Fixated Lens to Established Lens Designs.

PURPOSE: WE sought to evaluate differences in effective lens position (ELP) based on the lens design. Intraocular lenses (IOLs) with plate-haptic, c-loop haptic, and a rhexis-fixated lens were compared. DESIGN: Retrospective, multicenter, comparative case series. METHODS: The study included patients having age-related cataract surgery with implantation of either a plate-haptic, c-loop haptic, or a novel rhexis-fixated IOL. Biometry and refraction measurements were conducted preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Lens constant optimization was performed. RESULTS: Seventy eyes of 56 subjects were included. ELP for rhexis-fixated IOL was shortest (4.29 ± 0.24 mm), followed by c-loop haptic (4.41 ± 0.42 mm) and plate-haptic (4.51 ± 0.26 mm) IOL. Difference in ELP was significant between rhexis-fixated IOL and both plate-haptic (P = .001) and c-loop haptic IOL (P = .000). Anterior chamber depth adjustment based on lens design showed a significant effect on refraction and IOL power predictions for all formulas and lenses (P < .05). For the rhexis-fixated IOL the differences in refraction ranged from -0.039 diopters (D) for the Hill-Radial Basis Function to -0.096 D for Haigis. The other 2 lenses showed mean differences in refraction between +0.046 D for Hill-Radial Basis Function and +0.097 D for Haigis. CONCLUSION: The difference in IOL fixation and its resulting position in the capsular bag have a significant effect on the effective lens position and consequently a significant effect on the prediction of postoperative refraction.